Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2010

01-11-2010 | Original Research

What Happens After an Elevated PSA Test: The Experience of 13,591 Veterans

Authors: Steven B. Zeliadt, PhD, MPH, Richard M. Hoffman, MD, MPH, Ruth Etzioni, PhD, Van Anh T. Ginger, MD, PhD, Daniel W. Lin, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 11/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The occurrence and timing of prostate biopsy following an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test varied considerably in randomized screening trials.

Objective

Examine practice patterns in routine clinical care in response to an elevated PSA test (≥4 ng/μl) and determine whether time to biopsy was associated with cancer stage at diagnosis.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Participants

All veterans (n = 13,591) in the Pacific Northwest VA Network with a PSA ≥4 ng/μl between 1998 and 2006 and no previous elevated PSA tests or prostate biopsy.

Main Measures

We assessed follow-up care including additional PSA testing, urology consults, and biopsies. We compared stage at diagnosis for men who were biopsied within 24 months vs. those men biopsied and diagnosed >24 months after the elevated PSA test.

Key Results

Two-thirds of patients received follow-up evaluation within 24 months of the elevated PSA test: 32.8% of men underwent a biopsy, 15.5% attended a urology visit but were not biopsied, and 18.8% had a subsequent normal PSA test. Younger age, higher PSA levels, more prior PSA tests, no co-payment requirements, existing urologic conditions, low body mass index, and low comorbidity scores were associated with more complete follow-up. Among men who underwent radical prostatectomy, a delayed diagnosis was not significantly associated with having a pathologically advanced-stage cancer (T3/T4), although we found an increased likelihood of presenting with stage T2C relative to stage T2A or T2B cancer.

Conclusions

Follow-up after an elevated PSA test is highly variable with more than a third of men receiving care that could be considered incomplete. A delayed diagnosis was not associated with poorer prognosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wolf AM, Wender RC, Etzioni RB, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:70–98.CrossRefPubMed Wolf AM, Wender RC, Etzioni RB, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:70–98.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1310–1319.CrossRefPubMed Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1310–1319.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1320–1328.CrossRefPubMed Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1320–1328.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pinsky PF, Andriole GL, Kramer BS, et al. Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial. J Urol. 2005;173:746–750. discussion 750-741.CrossRefPubMed Pinsky PF, Andriole GL, Kramer BS, et al. Prostate biopsy following a positive screen in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial. J Urol. 2005;173:746–750. discussion 750-741.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Grubb RL 3rd, Pinsky PF, Greenlee RT, et al. Prostate cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial: update on findings from the initial four rounds of screening in a randomized trial. BJU Int. 2008;102:1524–1530.CrossRefPubMed Grubb RL 3rd, Pinsky PF, Greenlee RT, et al. Prostate cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial: update on findings from the initial four rounds of screening in a randomized trial. BJU Int. 2008;102:1524–1530.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference de Koning HJ, Auvinen A, Berenguer Sanchez A, et al. Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer trial and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary cancer trial. Int J Cancer. 2002;97:237–244.CrossRefPubMed de Koning HJ, Auvinen A, Berenguer Sanchez A, et al. Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European Randomized Screening for Prostate Cancer trial and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovary cancer trial. Int J Cancer. 2002;97:237–244.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hoffman RM, Blume P, Gilliland F. Prostate-specific antigen testing practices and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:106–110.CrossRefPubMed Hoffman RM, Blume P, Gilliland F. Prostate-specific antigen testing practices and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:106–110.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Maynard C, Chapko MK. Data resources in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl 2):B22–26.CrossRefPubMed Maynard C, Chapko MK. Data resources in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl 2):B22–26.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nattinger AB, Laud PW, Bajorunaite R, et al. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer. Health Serv Res. 2004;39:1733–1749.CrossRefPubMed Nattinger AB, Laud PW, Bajorunaite R, et al. An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer. Health Serv Res. 2004;39:1733–1749.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kuo YF, Goodwin JS, Shahinian VB. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist use in men without a cancer registry diagnosis of prostate cancer. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:146.CrossRefPubMed Kuo YF, Goodwin JS, Shahinian VB. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist use in men without a cancer registry diagnosis of prostate cancer. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:146.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K, et al. PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA. 2006;296:2336–2342.CrossRefPubMed Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K, et al. PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA. 2006;296:2336–2342.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wei JT, Calhoun EA, Jacobsen SJ. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. In: Litwin MS, Saigal CS, eds. Urologic Diseases in America. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2007:43–69. Wei JT, Calhoun EA, Jacobsen SJ. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. In: Litwin MS, Saigal CS, eds. Urologic Diseases in America. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2007:43–69.
14.
go back to reference McNaughton-Collins M, Joyce GF, Wise M, et al. Prostatitis. In: Litwin MS, Saigal CS, eds. Urologic Diseases in America. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2007:9–41. McNaughton-Collins M, Joyce GF, Wise M, et al. Prostatitis. In: Litwin MS, Saigal CS, eds. Urologic Diseases in America. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2007:9–41.
15.
go back to reference Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–1139.CrossRefPubMed Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–1139.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Morrill R, Cromartie J, Hart G. Metropolitan, urban, and rural commuting areas: toward a better depiction of the United States settlement system. Urban Geography. 1999;20:727–748.CrossRef Morrill R, Cromartie J, Hart G. Metropolitan, urban, and rural commuting areas: toward a better depiction of the United States settlement system. Urban Geography. 1999;20:727–748.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hart LG, Larson EH, Lishner DM. Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1149–1155.CrossRefPubMed Hart LG, Larson EH, Lishner DM. Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1149–1155.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Chichester: Wiley; 1989. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Chichester: Wiley; 1989.
19.
go back to reference Long JS, Freese J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata 2nd ed. College Station: Stata Press; 2006. Long JS, Freese J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata 2nd ed. College Station: Stata Press; 2006.
20.
go back to reference Long JS, Freese J. Spost9: Post-estimation interpretation of regression models including multinomial regression models. UCLA: Academic Technology Services, Statistical Consulting Group. Los Angeles 2009. Long JS, Freese J. Spost9: Post-estimation interpretation of regression models including multinomial regression models. UCLA: Academic Technology Services, Statistical Consulting Group. Los Angeles 2009.
22.
go back to reference Stamey TA, Johnstone IM, McNeal JE, et al. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen levels between 2 and 22 ng./ml. correlate poorly with post-radical prostatectomy cancer morphology: prostate specific antigen cure rates appear constant between 2 and 9 ng./ml. J Urol. 2002;167:103–111.CrossRefPubMed Stamey TA, Johnstone IM, McNeal JE, et al. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen levels between 2 and 22 ng./ml. correlate poorly with post-radical prostatectomy cancer morphology: prostate specific antigen cure rates appear constant between 2 and 9 ng./ml. J Urol. 2002;167:103–111.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7005–7012.CrossRefPubMed Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7005–7012.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ankerst DP, Miyamoto R, Nair PV, et al. Yearly prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination fluctuations in a screened population. J Urol. 2009;181:2071–2075. discussion 2076.CrossRefPubMed Ankerst DP, Miyamoto R, Nair PV, et al. Yearly prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination fluctuations in a screened population. J Urol. 2009;181:2071–2075. discussion 2076.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference McNaughton-Collins M, Fowler FJ Jr, Caubet JF, et al. Psychological effects of a suspicious prostate cancer screening test followed by a benign biopsy result. Am J Med. 2004;117:719–725.CrossRefPubMed McNaughton-Collins M, Fowler FJ Jr, Caubet JF, et al. Psychological effects of a suspicious prostate cancer screening test followed by a benign biopsy result. Am J Med. 2004;117:719–725.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ Jr, et al. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291:71–78.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ Jr, et al. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291:71–78.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Volk RJ, Hawley ST, Kneuper S, et al. Trials of decision aids for prostate cancer screening: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:428–434.CrossRefPubMed Volk RJ, Hawley ST, Kneuper S, et al. Trials of decision aids for prostate cancer screening: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:428–434.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the US Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66.CrossRefPubMed Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the US Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, McConnell BA, et al. Practical issues in assisting shared decision-making. Health Expect. 2000;3:46–54.CrossRefPubMed Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, McConnell BA, et al. Practical issues in assisting shared decision-making. Health Expect. 2000;3:46–54.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Holmes-Rovner M, Stableford S, Fagerlin A, et al. Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:16.CrossRefPubMed Holmes-Rovner M, Stableford S, Fagerlin A, et al. Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:16.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Hoffman RM, Couper MP, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, et al. Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study). Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1611–1618.CrossRefPubMed Hoffman RM, Couper MP, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, et al. Prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the National Survey of Medical Decisions (DECISIONS study). Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1611–1618.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Federman DG, Goyal S, Kamina A, et al. Informed consent for PSA screening: does it happen? Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2:152–157.PubMed Federman DG, Goyal S, Kamina A, et al. Informed consent for PSA screening: does it happen? Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2:152–157.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Nelson KM, Starkebaum GA, Reiber GE. Veterans using and uninsured veterans not using Veterans Affairs (VA) health care. Public Health Rep. 2007;122:93–100.PubMed Nelson KM, Starkebaum GA, Reiber GE. Veterans using and uninsured veterans not using Veterans Affairs (VA) health care. Public Health Rep. 2007;122:93–100.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Ross LE, Taylor YJ, Richardson LC, et al. Patterns in prostate-specific antigen test use and digital rectal examinations in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002-2006. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009;101:316–324.PubMed Ross LE, Taylor YJ, Richardson LC, et al. Patterns in prostate-specific antigen test use and digital rectal examinations in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002-2006. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009;101:316–324.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Nepple KG, Joudi FN, Hillis SL, et al. Prevalence of delayed clinician response to elevated prostate-specific antigen values. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:439–448.CrossRefPubMed Nepple KG, Joudi FN, Hillis SL, et al. Prevalence of delayed clinician response to elevated prostate-specific antigen values. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:439–448.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Collins MM, Fowler FJ Jr, Roberts RG, et al. Medical malpractice implications of PSA testing for early detection of prostate cancer. J Law Med Ethics. 1997;25:234–242. 230.CrossRefPubMed Collins MM, Fowler FJ Jr, Roberts RG, et al. Medical malpractice implications of PSA testing for early detection of prostate cancer. J Law Med Ethics. 1997;25:234–242. 230.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Merenstein D. A piece of my mind. Winners and losers. JAMA. 2004;291:15–16.CrossRef Merenstein D. A piece of my mind. Winners and losers. JAMA. 2004;291:15–16.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Overmyer M. PSA in older men: New data, lawsuits raise the stakes. Urology Times. March 1, 2007. Overmyer M. PSA in older men: New data, lawsuits raise the stakes. Urology Times. March 1, 2007.
39.
go back to reference Krist AH, Woolf SH, Johnson RE. How physicians approach prostate cancer screening before and after losing a lawsuit. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:120–125.CrossRefPubMed Krist AH, Woolf SH, Johnson RE. How physicians approach prostate cancer screening before and after losing a lawsuit. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:120–125.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
What Happens After an Elevated PSA Test: The Experience of 13,591 Veterans
Authors
Steven B. Zeliadt, PhD, MPH
Richard M. Hoffman, MD, MPH
Ruth Etzioni, PhD
Van Anh T. Ginger, MD, PhD
Daniel W. Lin, MD
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 11/2010
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1468-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2010

Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2010 Go to the issue

Healing Arts: Materia Medica

Six Words

Clinical Practice: Clinical Images

Presenteeism: A Public Health Hazard