Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2009

01-09-2009 | Original Article

Electronic Versus Dictated Hospital Discharge Summaries: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: David M. Maslove, MD, FRCPC, Richard E. Leiter, BA, Joshua Griesman, Corinne Arnott, Ophyr Mourad, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Chi-Ming Chow, MDCM, MSc, FRCPC, FACC, Chaim M. Bell, MD, PhD, FRCPC

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 9/2009

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Patient care transitions are periods of enhanced risk. Discharge summaries have been used to communicate essential information between hospital-based physicians and primary care physicians (PCPs), and may reduce rates of adverse events after discharge.

OBJECTIVE

To assess PCP satisfaction with an electronic discharge summary (EDS) program as compared to conventional dictated discharge summaries.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Four medical teams of an academic general medical service.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary endpoint was overall discharge summary quality, as assessed by PCPs using a 100-point visual analogue scale. Other endpoints included housestaff satisfaction (using a 100-point scale), adverse outcomes after discharge (combined endpoint of emergency department visits, readmission, and death), and patient understanding of discharge details as measured by the Care Transition Model (CTM-3) score (ranging from 0 to 100).

RESULTS

209 patient discharges were included over a 2-month period encompassing 1 housestaff rotation. Surveys were sent out for 188 of these patient discharges, and 119 were returned (63% response rate). No difference in PCP-reported overall quality was observed between the 2 methods (86.4 for EDS vs. 84.3 for dictation; P = 0.53). Housestaff found the EDS significantly easier to use than conventional dictation (86.5 for EDS vs. 49.2 for dictation; P = 0.03), but there was no difference in overall housestaff satisfaction. There was no difference between discharge methods for the combined endpoint for adverse outcomes (22 for EDS [21%] vs. 21 for dictation [20%]; P = 0.89), or for patient understanding of discharge details (CTM-3 score 80.3 for EDS vs. 81.3 for dictation; P = 0.81)

CONCLUSION

An EDS program can be used by housestaff to more easily create hospital discharge summaries, and there was no difference in PCP satisfaction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference van Walraven C, Taljaard M, Bell CM, et al. Information exchange among physicians caring for the same patient in the community. CMAJ. 2008;179:1013–8.PubMed van Walraven C, Taljaard M, Bell CM, et al. Information exchange among physicians caring for the same patient in the community. CMAJ. 2008;179:1013–8.PubMed
2.
go back to reference van Walraven C, Rokosh E. What is necessary for high-quality discharge summaries? Am J Med Qual. 1999;14:160–9.PubMedCrossRef van Walraven C, Rokosh E. What is necessary for high-quality discharge summaries? Am J Med Qual. 1999;14:160–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference van Walraven C, Seth R, Austin PC, Laupacis A. Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:186–92.PubMedCrossRef van Walraven C, Seth R, Austin PC, Laupacis A. Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:186–92.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Moore C, McGinn T, Halm E. Tying up loose ends: Discharging patients with unresolved medical issues. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1305–11.PubMedCrossRef Moore C, McGinn T, Halm E. Tying up loose ends: Discharging patients with unresolved medical issues. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1305–11.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: Implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297:831–41.PubMedCrossRef Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: Implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297:831–41.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tulloch AJ, Fowler GH, McMullan JJ, Spence JM. Hospital discharge reports: content and design. BMJ. 1975;4(5994):443–6.PubMedCrossRef Tulloch AJ, Fowler GH, McMullan JJ, Spence JM. Hospital discharge reports: content and design. BMJ. 1975;4(5994):443–6.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mageean RJ. Study of "discharge communications" from hospital. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1986;293(6557):1283–4.CrossRef Mageean RJ. Study of "discharge communications" from hospital. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1986;293(6557):1283–4.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference van Walraven C, Weinberg AL. Quality assessment of a discharge summary system. CMAJ. 1995;152:1437–42.PubMed van Walraven C, Weinberg AL. Quality assessment of a discharge summary system. CMAJ. 1995;152:1437–42.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Macaulay EM, Cooper GG, Engeset J, Naylor AR. Prospective audit of discharge summary errors. Br J Surg. 1996;83:788–90.PubMedCrossRef Macaulay EM, Cooper GG, Engeset J, Naylor AR. Prospective audit of discharge summary errors. Br J Surg. 1996;83:788–90.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference O’Leary KJ, Liebovitz DM, Feinglass J, Liss D, Baker DW. Outpatient physicians’ satisfaction with discharge summaries and perceived need for an electronic discharge summary. J Hospital Med. 2006;1:317–20.CrossRef O’Leary KJ, Liebovitz DM, Feinglass J, Liss D, Baker DW. Outpatient physicians’ satisfaction with discharge summaries and perceived need for an electronic discharge summary. J Hospital Med. 2006;1:317–20.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference van Walraven C, Laupacis A, Seth R, Wells G. Dictated versus database-generated discharge summaries: a randomized clinical trial. CMAJ. 1999;160:319–26.PubMed van Walraven C, Laupacis A, Seth R, Wells G. Dictated versus database-generated discharge summaries: a randomized clinical trial. CMAJ. 1999;160:319–26.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lissauer T, Paterson CM, Simons A, Beard RW. Evaluation of computer generated neonatal discharge summaries. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:433–6.PubMedCrossRef Lissauer T, Paterson CM, Simons A, Beard RW. Evaluation of computer generated neonatal discharge summaries. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:433–6.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Llewelyn DE, Ewins DL, Horn J, Evans TGR, McGregor AM. Computerised updating of clinical summaries: new opportunities for clinical practice and research? BMJ. 1988;297(6662):1504–6.PubMedCrossRef Llewelyn DE, Ewins DL, Horn J, Evans TGR, McGregor AM. Computerised updating of clinical summaries: new opportunities for clinical practice and research? BMJ. 1988;297(6662):1504–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Smith RP, Holzman GB. The application of a computer data base system to the generation of hospital discharge summaries. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73:803–7.PubMed Smith RP, Holzman GB. The application of a computer data base system to the generation of hospital discharge summaries. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73:803–7.PubMed
15.
go back to reference O’Leary KJ, Liebovitz DM, Feinglass J, et al. Creating a better discharge summary: Improvement in quality and timeliness using an electronic discharge summary. J Hosp Med. 2009;4:219–25.PubMedCrossRef O’Leary KJ, Liebovitz DM, Feinglass J, et al. Creating a better discharge summary: Improvement in quality and timeliness using an electronic discharge summary. J Hosp Med. 2009;4:219–25.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Callen JL, Alderton M, McIntosh J. Evaluation of electronic discharge summaries: a comparison of documentation in electronic and handwritten discharge summaries. Int J Med Informatics. 2008;77:613–20.CrossRef Callen JL, Alderton M, McIntosh J. Evaluation of electronic discharge summaries: a comparison of documentation in electronic and handwritten discharge summaries. Int J Med Informatics. 2008;77:613–20.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Weir CR, Nebeker JR. Critical issues in an electronic documentation system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007;11:786–90. Weir CR, Nebeker JR. Critical issues in an electronic documentation system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007;11:786–90.
18.
go back to reference Van Walraven C, Mamdani M, Fang J, Austin PC. Continuity of care and patient outcomes after hospital discharge. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:624–31.PubMedCrossRef Van Walraven C, Mamdani M, Fang J, Austin PC. Continuity of care and patient outcomes after hospital discharge. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:624–31.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kerry SM, Bland JM. The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomisation. BMJ. 1998;316(7142):1455.PubMed Kerry SM, Bland JM. The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomisation. BMJ. 1998;316(7142):1455.PubMed
21.
go back to reference O’Donnell HC, Kaushal R, Barron Y, Callahan MA, Adelman RD, Siegler EL. Physicians attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;24:63–8.PubMedCrossRef O’Donnell HC, Kaushal R, Barron Y, Callahan MA, Adelman RD, Siegler EL. Physicians attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;24:63–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Electronic Versus Dictated Hospital Discharge Summaries: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
David M. Maslove, MD, FRCPC
Richard E. Leiter, BA
Joshua Griesman
Corinne Arnott
Ophyr Mourad, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Chi-Ming Chow, MDCM, MSc, FRCPC, FACC
Chaim M. Bell, MD, PhD, FRCPC
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1053-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2009

Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2009 Go to the issue