Top

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Published in:

01-10-2008 | Original Article

Patient Assessments of the Most Important Medical Decision During a Hospitalization

Authors: Thomas V. Perneger, MD, PhD, Agathe Charvet-Bérard, MS, Arnaud Perrier, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 10/2008

Abstract

Background

How medical decisions are made in real-life situations is largely unexplored. We explored patients’ perceptions of decision-making during a hospitalization and examined the conformity of the decision process with expert recommendations.

Objective

To describe the conformity of the decision-making process with current expert opinion and examine the associations between various aspects of the decision-making process and a global assessment of the decision.

Methods

Mail survey of patients discharged from a teaching hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. Patients identified the main medical decision during their stay, and rated the decision process (11-item “decision process score”) and their satisfaction with the decision (five-item “decision satisfaction score”). Both scores were scaled between 0 (worst) and 100 (best).

Participants

The survey had 1467 respondents.

Main Results

In total 862 (58.8%) of 1467 respondents reported having made a medical decision while in the hospital. The decision process score (mean 78.5, SD 21.5) and the decision satisfaction score (mean 86.5, SD 20.4) were moderately correlated (r = 0.62). Men, healthier patients, patients discharged from the department of surgery, and those who reported sharing the decision with their doctor gave the highest ratings on both scales. Five process variables were independently associated with high satisfaction with the decision: the doctor explained all possible treatments and examinations, the patient was aware of risks at the time of the decision, the doctor’s explanations were easy to understand, the patient was involved in the decision as much as desired or more, and the patient was not pressured into the decision.

Conclusions

A majority of patients discharged from a general hospital were able to identify and rate a medical decision. Recommended features of the process of medical decision-making were associated with greater satisfaction with the decision.

Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.PubMedCrossRef

Laine C, Davidoff F. Patient centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA. 1996;275:152–6.PubMedCrossRef

Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:102–114.PubMedCrossRef

Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:329–39.PubMedCrossRef

Woolf SH, Chan ECY, Harris R, Sheridan SL, Braddock CH, Kaplan RM, Krist A, O’Connor A, Tunis S. Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:293–300.PubMed

Mazur DJ, Hickam DH. Patients’ preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:114–7.PubMedCrossRef

McGuire AL, McCullough LB, Weller SC, Whitney SN. Missed expectations? Physicians’ views of patients’ participation in medical decision-making. Med Care. 2005;43:466–70.PubMedCrossRef

Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Gandek B, Rogers WH, Ware JE. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:497–504.PubMed

Golin C, DiMatteo MR, Duan N, Leake B, Gelberg L. Impoverished diabetic patients whose doctors facilitate their participation in medical decision making are more satisfied with their care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:866–75.CrossRef

10.

Clever SL, Ford DE, Rubenstein LV, Rost KM, Meredith LS, Sherbourne CD, Wang NY, Arbelaez JJ, Cooper LA. Primary care patients’ involvement in decision making is associated with improvement in depression. Med Care. 2006;44:398–405.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15:9–19.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Gotler RS, Flocke SA, Goodwin MA, Zyzanski SJ, Murray TH, Stange KC. Facilitating participatory decision making. What happens in real-world community practice? Med Care. 2000;38:1200–9.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Braddock CH, Fihn SD, Levinson W, Jonsen AR, Pearlman RA. How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:339–45.PubMed

14.

Braddock CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice. Time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313–20.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Street RL, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations. Why some patients are more involved than others. Med Care. 2005;43:960–9.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Ford S, Schofield T, Hope T. Observing decision-making in the general practice consultation: who makes which decisions? Health Expectations. 2006;9:130–7.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Entwistle VA, Watt IS, Gilhooly K, Bugge C, Haites N, Walker AE. Assessing patients’ participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55:105–13.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Skea Z, Harry V, Bhattacharya S, Entwistle V, Williams B, MacLennan G, Templeton A. Women’s perceptions of decision-making about hysterectomy. BJOG. 2004;111:133–42.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Strull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA. 1984;252:2990–4.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, Liu L, Deapen D, Salem B, Lakhani I, Morrow M. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5526–33.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, O’Connor A, Biggs J, Drake E, Yetisir E, Hart RG. A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;282:737–43.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Perneger TV, Chamot A, Bovier PA. Non-response bias in a survey of patient perceptions of hospital care. Med Care. 2005;43:374–80.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Agoritsas T, Bovier PA, Perneger TV. Patient reports of undesirable events during hospitalization. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:922–8.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, Roberts M, Moloney TW, McMullen W, Walker JD, Delbanco TL. Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey. Health Aff (Milwood). 1991;10:254–67.CrossRef

25.

Jenkinson C, Stewart-Brown S, Petersen S, Paice C. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:46–50.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Leplège A, Ecosse E, Verdier A, Perneger TV. The French SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation, and preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1013–23.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Elwyn G, Edwards A, Mowle S, Wensing M, Wilkinson C, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision-making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;43:5–22.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Elwyn G, Edwards A, Hood K, Roblling M, Atwell C, Holmes-Rovner M, Kinnersley P, Houston H, Russell I. The development of COMRADE – a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50:311–22.PubMedCrossRef

29.

O’Connor A. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:25–30.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:93–99.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, Sloan JA, Carriere KC, O’Neill J, Bilodeau B, Watson P, Mueller P. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1997;277:1485–92.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Chamot E, Charvet A, Perneger TV. Women’s preferences for doctor’s involvement in decisions about mammography screening. Med Decis Making. 2004;24:379–85.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Brehaut JC, O’Connor A, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, Feldman-Stewart D. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:281–91.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N, Rovner DR, Breer ML, Rothert ML, Padonu G, Talarczyk G. Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the Satisfaction with Decision Scale. Med Decis Making. 1996;16:58–64.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Taylor HA. Barriers to informed consent. Sem Oncol Nurs. 1999;15:89–95.CrossRef

36.

Lanz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, Liu L, Lakhani I, Salem B, Katz SJ. Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and decision process in a population based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:745–68.CrossRef

37.

Carlsen B, Aakvik A. Patient involvement in clinical decision making: the effect of GP attitude on patient satisfaction. Health Expect. 2006;9:148–57.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Patient Assessments of the Most Important Medical Decision During a Hospitalization
Authors: Thomas V. Perneger, MD, PhD
Agathe Charvet-Bérard, MS
Arnaud Perrier, MD
Publication date: 01-10-2008
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 10/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0736-4

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Patient Assessments of the Most Important Medical Decision During a Hospitalization

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Participants

Main Results

Conclusions

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Participants

Main Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2008

Comfort Measures Only

Content of Weblogs Written by Health Professionals

Affective Forecasting: An Unrecognized Challenge in Making Serious Health Decisions

Providers’ Perceptions of Relationships and Professional Roles when Caring for Patients who Leave the Hospital Against Medical Advice

Border Guards, Part IV

Medicare Beneficiaries and Free Prescription Drug Samples: A National Survey

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page