Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2008

01-09-2008 | Original Article

When a Usual Source of Care and Usual Provider Matter: Adult Prevention and Screening Services

Authors: Lynn A. Blewett, PhD, Pamela Jo Johnson, MPH, PhD, Brian Lee, MPH, Peter B. Scal, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 9/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the usual source of preventive care, (having a usual place for care only or the combination of a usual place and provider compared with no usual source of preventive care) is associated with adults receiving recommended screening and prevention services.

DESIGN

Using cross-sectional survey data for 24,138 adults (ages 18–64) from the 1999 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), we estimated adjusted odds ratios using separate logistic regression models for receipt of five preventive services: influenza vaccine, Pap smear, mammogram, clinical breast exam, and prostate specific antigen.

RESULTS

Having both a usual place and a usual provider was consistently associated with increased odds for receiving preventive care/screening services compared to having a place only or neither. Adults ages 50–64 with a usual place/provider had 2.8 times greater odds of receiving a past year flu shot compared with those who had neither. Men ages 50–64 with a usual place/provider had nearly 10 times higher odds of receiving a PSA test compared with men who had neither. Having a usual place/provider compared with having neither was associated with 3.9 times higher odds of clinical breast exam among women ages 20–64, 4.1 times higher odds of Pap testing among women ages 21–64, and 4.8 times higher odds of mammogram among women ages 40–64.

CONCLUSIONS

Having both a usual place and usual provider is a key variable in determining whether adults receive recommended screening and prevention services and should be considered a fundamental component of any medical home model for adults.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Damiano PC, Momany ET, Tyler MC, et al. Cost of outpatient medical care for children and youth with special health care needs: investigating the impact of the medical home. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1187–94.PubMedCrossRef Damiano PC, Momany ET, Tyler MC, et al. Cost of outpatient medical care for children and youth with special health care needs: investigating the impact of the medical home. Pediatrics. 2006;118:e1187–94.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Starfield B, Shi L. The medical home, access to care, and insurance: a review of evidence. Pediatrics. 2004;113suppl1493–98.PubMed Starfield B, Shi L. The medical home, access to care, and insurance: a review of evidence. Pediatrics. 2004;113suppl1493–98.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Smith PJ, Santoli JM, Chu SY, et al. The association between having a medical home and vaccination coverage among children eligible for the vaccines for children program. Pediatrics. 2005;116:130–9.PubMedCrossRef Smith PJ, Santoli JM, Chu SY, et al. The association between having a medical home and vaccination coverage among children eligible for the vaccines for children program. Pediatrics. 2005;116:130–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Xu KT. Usual source of care in preventive service use: a regular doctor versus a regular site. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1509–29.PubMedCrossRef Xu KT. Usual source of care in preventive service use: a regular doctor versus a regular site. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1509–29.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference DeVoe JE, Fryer GE, Phillips R, et al. Receipt of preventive care among adults: insurance status and usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:786–91.PubMedCrossRef DeVoe JE, Fryer GE, Phillips R, et al. Receipt of preventive care among adults: insurance status and usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:786–91.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ettner SL. The relationship between continuity of care and the health behaviors of patients: does having a usual physician make a difference? Med Care. 1999;37:547–55.PubMedCrossRef Ettner SL. The relationship between continuity of care and the health behaviors of patients: does having a usual physician make a difference? Med Care. 1999;37:547–55.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. Cancer screening in the United States, 2007: a review of current guidelines, practices, and prospects. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57290–104.PubMed Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. Cancer screening in the United States, 2007: a review of current guidelines, practices, and prospects. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57290–104.PubMed
10.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software; Release 9.0. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2005. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software; Release 9.0. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2005.
11.
go back to reference StataCorp. Survey Data Reference Manual. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2005. StataCorp. Survey Data Reference Manual. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2005.
12.
go back to reference Ettner SL. The timing of preventive services for women and children: the effect of having a usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1748–54.PubMed Ettner SL. The timing of preventive services for women and children: the effect of having a usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1748–54.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Doescher MP, Saver BG, Fiscella K, et al. Preventive care: Does continuity count? J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:632–7.PubMedCrossRef Doescher MP, Saver BG, Fiscella K, et al. Preventive care: Does continuity count? J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:632–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
When a Usual Source of Care and Usual Provider Matter: Adult Prevention and Screening Services
Authors
Lynn A. Blewett, PhD
Pamela Jo Johnson, MPH, PhD
Brian Lee, MPH
Peter B. Scal, MD
Publication date
01-09-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0659-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2008 Go to the issue