Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2008

01-04-2008 | Original Article

Patient Difficulty Using Tablet Computers to Screen in Primary Care

Authors: Rachel Hess, MD MSc, Aimee Santucci, PhD, Kathleen McTigue, MD, MS, MPH, Gary Fischer, MD, Wishwa Kapoor, MD, MPH

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 4/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient-administered computerized questionnaires represent a novel tool to assist primary care physicians in the delivery of preventive health care.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported ease of use with a self-administered tablet computer-based questionnaire in routine clinical care.

Design

All patients seen in a university-based primary care practice were asked to provide routine screening information using a touch-screen tablet computer-based questionnaire. Patients reported difficulty using the tablet computer after completion of their first questionnaire.

Patients

Ten thousand nine hundred ninety-nine patients completed the questionnaire between January 2004 and January 2006.

Measurements

We calculated rates of reporting difficulty (no difficulty, some difficulty, or a lot of difficulty) using the tablet computers based on patient age, sex, race, educational attainment, marital status, and number of comorbid medical conditions. We constructed multivariable ordered logistic models to identify predictors of increased self-reported difficulty using the computer.

Results

The majority of patients (84%) reported no difficulty using the tablet computers to complete the questionnaire, with only 3% reporting a lot of difficulty. Significant predictors of reporting more difficulty included increasing age [odds ratio (OR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–1.05)]; Asian race (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.8–2.9); African American race (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–1.6); less than a high school education (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.6–3.4); and the presence of comorbid medical conditions (1–2: OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2–1.5; ≥3: OR 1.7 95% CI 1.5–2.1).

Conclusions

The majority of primary care patients reported no difficulty using a self-administered tablet computer-based questionnaire. While computerized questionnaires present opportunities to collect routine screening information from patients, attention must be paid to vulnerable groups.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bachman JW. The patient-computer interview: a neglected tool that can aid the clinician. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(1):67–78.PubMed Bachman JW. The patient-computer interview: a neglected tool that can aid the clinician. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78(1):67–78.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bliven BD, Kaufman SE, Spertus JA. Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time benefits, and patient preference. Qual Life Res. 2001;10(1):15–22.PubMedCrossRef Bliven BD, Kaufman SE, Spertus JA. Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time benefits, and patient preference. Qual Life Res. 2001;10(1):15–22.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference McGuire M, Bakst K, Fairbanks L, et al. Cognitive, mood, and functional evaluations using touchscreen technologies. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000;188(12):813–7.PubMedCrossRef McGuire M, Bakst K, Fairbanks L, et al. Cognitive, mood, and functional evaluations using touchscreen technologies. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000;188(12):813–7.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jette AM, Davies A, Cleary PD, et al. The functional status questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1(3):143–9.PubMedCrossRef Jette AM, Davies A, Cleary PD, et al. The functional status questionnaire: reliability and validity when used in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1(3):143–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Feigelson ME, Dwight SA. Can asking questions by computer improve the candidness of responding? A meta-analytic perspective. Consult Psychol J: Prac Res. 2000;52(4):248–55.CrossRef Feigelson ME, Dwight SA. Can asking questions by computer improve the candidness of responding? A meta-analytic perspective. Consult Psychol J: Prac Res. 2000;52(4):248–55.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(5):355–61. US Preventive Services Task Force. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(5):355–61.
7.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for suicide risk: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(10):820–1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for suicide risk: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(10):820–1.
8.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(7):554–6. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(7):554–6.
9.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for family and intimate partner violence: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(5):382–6. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for family and intimate partner violence: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(5):382–6.
10.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for thyroid disease: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(2):125–7. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for thyroid disease: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(2):125–7.
11.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for obesity in adults: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(11):930–2. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for obesity in adults: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(11):930–2.
12.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):212–4. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):212–4.
13.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):129–31. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):129–31.
14.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for depression: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(10):760–4. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for depression: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(10):760–4.
15.
go back to reference Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635–41.PubMedCrossRef Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635–41.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tsui JI, Dodson K, Jacobson TA. Cardiovascular disease prevention counseling in residency: resident and attending physician attitudes and practices. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004;96(8):1080–3. 1088–91.PubMed Tsui JI, Dodson K, Jacobson TA. Cardiovascular disease prevention counseling in residency: resident and attending physician attitudes and practices. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004;96(8):1080–3. 1088–91.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Melin I, Karlstrom B, Berglund L, Zamfir M, Rossner S. Education and supervision of health care professionals to initiate, implement and improve management of obesity. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58(2):127–36.PubMedCrossRef Melin I, Karlstrom B, Berglund L, Zamfir M, Rossner S. Education and supervision of health care professionals to initiate, implement and improve management of obesity. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58(2):127–36.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rollman BL, Hanusa BH, Gilbert T, Lowe HJ, Kapoor WN, Schulberg HC. The electronic medical record. A randomized trial of its impact on primary care physicians’ initial management of major depression [corrected]. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(2):189–97.PubMedCrossRef Rollman BL, Hanusa BH, Gilbert T, Lowe HJ, Kapoor WN, Schulberg HC. The electronic medical record. A randomized trial of its impact on primary care physicians’ initial management of major depression [corrected]. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(2):189–97.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rollman BL, Hanusa BH, Lowe HJ, Gilbert T, Kapoor WN, Schulberg HC. A randomized trial using computerized decision support to improve treatment of major depression in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(7):493–503.PubMedCrossRef Rollman BL, Hanusa BH, Lowe HJ, Gilbert T, Kapoor WN, Schulberg HC. A randomized trial using computerized decision support to improve treatment of major depression in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(7):493–503.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bock B, Niaura , Fontes A, Bock F. Acceptability of computer assessments among ethnically diverse, low-income smokers. Am J Health Promot. 1999;13(5):299–304.PubMed Bock B, Niaura , Fontes A, Bock F. Acceptability of computer assessments among ethnically diverse, low-income smokers. Am J Health Promot. 1999;13(5):299–304.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Hess , Matthews K, McNeil M, Chang CCH, Kapoor W, Bryce C. Health services research in the privacy age. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(11):1045–9.PubMedCrossRef Hess , Matthews K, McNeil M, Chang CCH, Kapoor W, Bryce C. Health services research in the privacy age. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(11):1045–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Dickinson A, Gregor P. Designing computer systems for and with older users. Behav Inf Technol. 2007;26(4):273–4.CrossRef Dickinson A, Gregor P. Designing computer systems for and with older users. Behav Inf Technol. 2007;26(4):273–4.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hawthorn D. Interface design and engagement with older people. Behav Inf Technol. 2007;26(4):333–41.CrossRef Hawthorn D. Interface design and engagement with older people. Behav Inf Technol. 2007;26(4):333–41.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dickinson A, Arnott J, Prior S. Methods for human–computer interaction research with older people. Behav Inf Technol. 2007;26(4):343–52.CrossRef Dickinson A, Arnott J, Prior S. Methods for human–computer interaction research with older people. Behav Inf Technol. 2007;26(4):343–52.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Larkin-Lieffers PA. The older adult and public library computer technology: a pilot study in a Canadian setting. Libri. 2000;50:225–34.CrossRef Larkin-Lieffers PA. The older adult and public library computer technology: a pilot study in a Canadian setting. Libri. 2000;50:225–34.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Main D, Quintela J, Araya-Guerra , Holcomb S, Pace W. Exploring patient reactions to pen-tablet computers: a report from CaReNet. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(5):421–4.PubMedCrossRef Main D, Quintela J, Araya-Guerra , Holcomb S, Pace W. Exploring patient reactions to pen-tablet computers: a report from CaReNet. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(5):421–4.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient Difficulty Using Tablet Computers to Screen in Primary Care
Authors
Rachel Hess, MD MSc
Aimee Santucci, PhD
Kathleen McTigue, MD, MS, MPH
Gary Fischer, MD
Wishwa Kapoor, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-04-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0500-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2008 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.