Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2008

01-03-2008 | Original Article

Primary Care Physicians’ Decisions About Discharging Patients from Their Practices

Authors: Neil J. Farber, MD, FACP, Michelle E. Jordan, DO, Julie Silverstein, MD, FACP, Virginia U. Collier, MD, FACP, Joan Weiner, PhD, E. Gil Boyer, EdD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

There are few data available about factors which influence physicians’ decisions to discharge patients from their practices. To study general internists’ and family medicine physicians’ attitudes and experiences in discharging patients from their practices.

Design

A cross-sectional mailed survey was used.

Participants

One thousand general internists and family medicine physicians participated in this study.

Measurements and Main Results

We studied the likelihood physicians would discharge 12 hypothetical patients from their practices, and whether they had actually discharged such patients. The effect of demographic data on the number of scenarios in which patients were likely to be discharged, and the number of patients actually discharged were analyzed via ANOVA and multiple logistic regression analysis. Of 977 surveys received by subjects, 526 (54%) were completed and returned. A majority of respondents were willing to discharge patients in 5 of 12 hypothetical scenarios. Eighty-five percent had actually discharged at least one patient from their practices. Most respondents (71%) had discharged 10 or fewer patients, but 14% had discharged 11 to 200 patients. Respondents who were in private practice (p < 0.000001) were more likely to discharge both hypothetical and actual patients from their practices. Older physicians (≥48 years old) were more likely to discharge actual patients from their practices (p = 0.005) as were physicians practicing in rural settings (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Most physicians in our sample were willing to discharge actual and hypothetical patients from their practices. This tendency may have significant implications for the initiation of pay-for-performance programs. Physicians should be educated about the importance of the patient–physician relationship and their fiduciary obligations to the patient.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Quill TE, Cassel CK. Nonabandonment: a central obligation for physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:368–74.PubMed Quill TE, Cassel CK. Nonabandonment: a central obligation for physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:368–74.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Code of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2006: 239, 311–17. Code of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2006: 239, 311–17.
5.
go back to reference Pellegrino ED. Nonabandonment: an old obligation revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:377–78.PubMed Pellegrino ED. Nonabandonment: an old obligation revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:377–78.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Thieman S. Avoiding the claim of patient abandonment. Missouri Med. 1996;93:634–35.PubMed Thieman S. Avoiding the claim of patient abandonment. Missouri Med. 1996;93:634–35.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gordon HL, Reiser SJ. Do physicians have a duty to treat Medicare patients? Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:563–65.PubMedCrossRef Gordon HL, Reiser SJ. Do physicians have a duty to treat Medicare patients? Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:563–65.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tapper CM. Unilateral termination of treatment by a psychiatrist. Can J Psychiatry. 1994;39:2–3.PubMed Tapper CM. Unilateral termination of treatment by a psychiatrist. Can J Psychiatry. 1994;39:2–3.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cummings R, Young S. Patient removals. Health Service J. 2000;110(5):26–7. Cummings R, Young S. Patient removals. Health Service J. 2000;110(5):26–7.
10.
go back to reference Stokes T, McKinley RK, Dixon-Woods M. Removal from a GP’s list: qualitative research is needed. BMJ. 2001;323:754.PubMedCrossRef Stokes T, McKinley RK, Dixon-Woods M. Removal from a GP’s list: qualitative research is needed. BMJ. 2001;323:754.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sampson F, Munro J, Pickin M, Nicholl J. Why are patients removed from their doctors’ lists? A comparison of patients’ and doctors’ accounts of removal. Fam Pract. 2004;21:515–18.PubMedCrossRef Sampson F, Munro J, Pickin M, Nicholl J. Why are patients removed from their doctors’ lists? A comparison of patients’ and doctors’ accounts of removal. Fam Pract. 2004;21:515–18.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sparr LF, Rogers JL, Beahrs JO, Mazur DJ. Disruptive medical patients. Forensically informed decision making. West J Med. 1992;156:501–6.PubMed Sparr LF, Rogers JL, Beahrs JO, Mazur DJ. Disruptive medical patients. Forensically informed decision making. West J Med. 1992;156:501–6.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Landon BE. Commentary on “penetrating the ‘black box’: financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services,” by Douglas A Conrad and Jon B Christianson. Med Care Research Review. 2004;61(Suppl 3):69S–75S.CrossRef Landon BE. Commentary on “penetrating the ‘black box’: financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services,” by Douglas A Conrad and Jon B Christianson. Med Care Research Review. 2004;61(Suppl 3):69S–75S.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Weber DO. The dark side of P4P. Physician Executive. 2005;31(6):20–5.PubMed Weber DO. The dark side of P4P. Physician Executive. 2005;31(6):20–5.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases. Implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294:716–24.PubMedCrossRef Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases. Implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294:716–24.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Herring ME, Erde EL. HMO doctor—for nonsmokers only? Cambridge Q Healthcare Ethics. 1994;3:67–70.CrossRef Herring ME, Erde EL. HMO doctor—for nonsmokers only? Cambridge Q Healthcare Ethics. 1994;3:67–70.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Murray D. Dismiss a patient, invite a lawsuit? Med Economics. 1993;70(16):57–8. 63–4, 69–70. Murray D. Dismiss a patient, invite a lawsuit? Med Economics. 1993;70(16):57–8. 63–4, 69–70.
18.
go back to reference Lowes RL. Dropping a bad HMO patient? Do it very carefully. Med Economics. 1995;72(15):94. 97–8, 101. Lowes RL. Dropping a bad HMO patient? Do it very carefully. Med Economics. 1995;72(15):94. 97–8, 101.
19.
go back to reference Rice B. The patients nobody wants. Med Economics. 1993;70(13):99–102. Rice B. The patients nobody wants. Med Economics. 1993;70(13):99–102.
20.
go back to reference Farber NJ, Novack DH, Silverstein J, Davis EB, Weiner J, Boyer EG. Physicians’ experiences with patients who transgress boundaries. JGIM. 2000;15:770–5.PubMedCrossRef Farber NJ, Novack DH, Silverstein J, Davis EB, Weiner J, Boyer EG. Physicians’ experiences with patients who transgress boundaries. JGIM. 2000;15:770–5.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Stokes T, Dixon-Woods M, McKinley RK. Ending the doctor-patient relationship in general practice: a proposed model. Family Practice. 2004;21:507–14.PubMedCrossRef Stokes T, Dixon-Woods M, McKinley RK. Ending the doctor-patient relationship in general practice: a proposed model. Family Practice. 2004;21:507–14.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Smart DR. Physician characteristics and distribution in the United States. 2007 ed. Chicago: AMA; 2007: 1–11. Smart DR. Physician characteristics and distribution in the United States. 2007 ed. Chicago: AMA; 2007: 1–11.
Metadata
Title
Primary Care Physicians’ Decisions About Discharging Patients from Their Practices
Authors
Neil J. Farber, MD, FACP
Michelle E. Jordan, DO
Julie Silverstein, MD, FACP
Virginia U. Collier, MD, FACP
Joan Weiner, PhD
E. Gil Boyer, EdD
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0495-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 3/2008 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.