Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2008

01-04-2008 | Original Article

Informing Men about Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Education Materials

Authors: Dragan Ilic, PhD, Kristine Egberts, BBiomedSc Hons, Joanne E. McKenzie, MSc, Gail Risbridger, PhD, Sally Green, PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 4/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient education materials can assist patient decision making on prostate cancer screening.

Objective

To explore the effectiveness of presenting health information on prostate cancer screening using video, internet, and written interventions on patient decision making, attitudes, knowledge, and screening interest.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Participants

A total of 161 men aged over 45, who had never been screened for prostate cancer, were randomized to receive information on prostate cancer screening.

Measurements

Participants were assessed at baseline and 1-week postintervention for decisional conflict, screening interest, knowledge, anxiety, and decision-making preference.

Results

A total of 156 men were followed-up at 1-week postintervention. There was no statistical, or clinical, difference in mean change in decisional conflict scores between the 3 intervention groups (video vs internet −0.06 [95% CI −0.24 to 0.12]; video vs pamphlet 0.04 [95%CI −0.15 to 0.22]; internet vs pamphlet 0.10 [95%CI −0.09 to 0.28]). There was also no statistically significant difference in mean knowledge, anxiety, decision-making preference, and screening interest between the 3 intervention groups.

Conclusion

Results from this study indicate that there are no clinically significant differences in decisional conflict when men are presented health information on prostate cancer screening via video, written materials, or the internet. Given the equivalence of the 3 methods, other factors need to be considered in deciding which method to use. Health professionals should provide patient health education materials via a method that is most convenient to the patient and their preferred learning style.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parkin D, Bray F, Devesa S. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:S4–S66.PubMedCrossRef Parkin D, Bray F, Devesa S. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:S4–S66.PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Ilic D, O’Connor D, Green S, Wilt T. Screening for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 3, 2006. Ilic D, O’Connor D, Green S, Wilt T. Screening for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 3, 2006.
4.
go back to reference Eysenbach G, Jadad A. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the internet age. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3:e19.PubMedCrossRef Eysenbach G, Jadad A. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the internet age. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3:e19.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference O’Connor A, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Br Med J. 1999;319:731–4. O’Connor A, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Br Med J. 1999;319:731–4.
7.
go back to reference Ilic D, Risbridger G, Green S. The informed man: attitudes and information needs on prostate cancer screening. Journal of Men’s Health and Gender. 2005;2:414–20.CrossRef Ilic D, Risbridger G, Green S. The informed man: attitudes and information needs on prostate cancer screening. Journal of Men’s Health and Gender. 2005;2:414–20.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L. How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: a qualitative study. Br Med J. 2004;328:564–70.CrossRef Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L. How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: a qualitative study. Br Med J. 2004;328:564–70.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Flood A, Wennberg J, Nease R, Fowler F, Ding J, Hynes L. The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:342–9.PubMedCrossRef Flood A, Wennberg J, Nease R, Fowler F, Ding J, Hynes L. The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:342–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Frosch D, Kaplan R, Felitti V. Evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:391–8.PubMedCrossRef Frosch D, Kaplan R, Felitti V. Evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:391–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Frosch D, Kaplan R, Felitti V. A randomised controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:781–7.PubMedCrossRef Frosch D, Kaplan R, Felitti V. A randomised controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:781–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gattellari M, Ward J. Does evidence-based information about screening for prostate cancer enhance consumer decision-making? A randomized controlled trial. J Med Screen. 2003;10:27–39.PubMedCrossRef Gattellari M, Ward J. Does evidence-based information about screening for prostate cancer enhance consumer decision-making? A randomized controlled trial. J Med Screen. 2003;10:27–39.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gattellari M, Ward J. A community-based randomized controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:168–82.PubMedCrossRef Gattellari M, Ward J. A community-based randomized controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:168–82.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Partin M, Nelson D, Radosevich D, et al. Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences and behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:835–42.PubMedCrossRef Partin M, Nelson D, Radosevich D, et al. Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences and behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:835–42.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ruthman J, Ferrans C. Efficacy of a video for teaching patients about prostate cancer screening and treatment. Am J Health Promot. 2004;18:292–5.PubMed Ruthman J, Ferrans C. Efficacy of a video for teaching patients about prostate cancer screening and treatment. Am J Health Promot. 2004;18:292–5.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Volk R, Cass A, Spann S. A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:333–40.PubMedCrossRef Volk R, Cass A, Spann S. A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:333–40.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schapira M, Van Ruswyk J. The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision—aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:418–24.PubMed Schapira M, Van Ruswyk J. The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision—aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:418–24.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Davison J, Kirk P, Degner L, Hassard T. Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37:255–63.PubMedCrossRef Davison J, Kirk P, Degner L, Hassard T. Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37:255–63.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wilt T, Paul J, Murdoch M, Nelson D, Nugent S, Rubins H. Educating men about prostate cancer screening. A randomized trial of a mailed pamphlet. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4:278–86. Wilt T, Paul J, Murdoch M, Nelson D, Nugent S, Rubins H. Educating men about prostate cancer screening. A randomized trial of a mailed pamphlet. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4:278–86.
20.
go back to reference Schapira M, Meade C, Nattinger A. Enhanced decision-making: the use of a videotape decision—aid for patients with prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30:119–27.PubMedCrossRef Schapira M, Meade C, Nattinger A. Enhanced decision-making: the use of a videotape decision—aid for patients with prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30:119–27.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tate D, Wing R, Winett R. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285:1172–7.PubMedCrossRef Tate D, Wing R, Winett R. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285:1172–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Christensen H, Griffiths K, Jorm A. Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2004;328:265–70.CrossRef Christensen H, Griffiths K, Jorm A. Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2004;328:265–70.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Scherrer-Bannerman A, Fofonoff D, Minshall D, et al. Web-based education and support for patients on the cardiac surgery waiting list. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6:s72–74.PubMedCrossRef Scherrer-Bannerman A, Fofonoff D, Minshall D, et al. Web-based education and support for patients on the cardiac surgery waiting list. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6:s72–74.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference O’Connor A. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak. 1995;15:25–30.CrossRef O’Connor A. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak. 1995;15:25–30.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Marteau T, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventor. Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31:301–6.PubMed Marteau T, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventor. Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31:301–6.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Degner L, Sloan J. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:941–50.PubMedCrossRef Degner L, Sloan J. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:941–50.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Murray E, Davis H, Tai S, Coulter A, Gray A, Haines A. Randomized controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. Br Med J. 2001;323:1–6.CrossRef Murray E, Davis H, Tai S, Coulter A, Gray A, Haines A. Randomized controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. Br Med J. 2001;323:1–6.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wei L, Zhang J. Analysis of data with imbalance in the baseline outcome variable for randomized clinical trials. Drug Inf J. 2001;35:1201–14. Wei L, Zhang J. Analysis of data with imbalance in the baseline outcome variable for randomized clinical trials. Drug Inf J. 2001;35:1201–14.
29.
go back to reference Scott S, Goldberg M, Mayo N. Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:45–55.PubMedCrossRef Scott S, Goldberg M, Mayo N. Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:45–55.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Murray E, Burns J, See Tai S, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 4, 2005. Murray E, Burns J, See Tai S, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 4, 2005.
Metadata
Title
Informing Men about Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Education Materials
Authors
Dragan Ilic, PhD
Kristine Egberts, BBiomedSc Hons
Joanne E. McKenzie, MSc
Gail Risbridger, PhD
Sally Green, PhD
Publication date
01-04-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0466-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2008 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.