Top

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Published in:

01-02-2008 | Original Article

Detection and Description of Small Breast Masses by Residents Trained Using a Standardized Clinical Breast Exam Curriculum

Authors: Elizabeth Steiner, MD, Donald F. Austin, MD, MPH, Nancy C. Prouser, MS

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 2/2008

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effect of standardized clinical breast examination (CBE) training on residents’ ability to detect a 3-mm breast mass in a silicone breast model.

METHODS

In this nonrandomized controlled trial, 75 first year residents (R1s) at 8 family medicine, internal medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology training programs received the intervention and second year residents (R2s) did not. Trained residency faculty taught R1s vertical strip, three-pressure method (VS3PM) CBE using a standardized curriculum, including a 1- to 2-hour online self-study with video and 2.5-hour practicum using silicone models and a trained patient surrogate.

RESULTS

Solitary mass detection: 84% by R1s, 46% by R2s (RR = 1.82, 95%CI = 1.36, 2.43, P < 0.0001). Of those finding a mass, 62% of R1s and 10% of R2s used at least 5 of 8 standardized descriptors (RR = 6.19, 95%CI = 2.06, 18.59, P = 0.001). R1s false positive findings were not statistically different from R2s (P = 0.54). Both the use of VS3PM and total time spent on CBE were independently highly predictive of finding the mass in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Most untrained primary care residents are not proficient in CBE. Standardized VS3PM CBE training improves the ability to detect and describe a small mass in a silicone breast model. Better CBE training for residents may improve the early detection of breast cancer.

The durometer is a measure of firmness; a durometer of 40 is hard.

Society AC. Estimated new cancer cases and death by sex for all sites, US, 2004.

Society AC. Probability of developing invasive cancers over selected age intervals, by sex, US, 1998–2000.

Surveillance E, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database: Incidence—SEER 17 Regs Public—Use, Nov 2005 Sub (1973–2003 varying). National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch. http://www.seer.cancer.gov. Accessed May 3, 2007, 2007.

Randal J. High expectations for mammography at heart of many breast cancer malpractice cases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(6):429–30.PubMedCrossRef

Bancej C, Decker K, Chiarelli A, Harrison M, Turner D, Brisson J. Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Screen. 2003;10(1):16–21.PubMedCrossRef

Park B, Suent-Ii K, Mi Hye K, Eun-Kyung K, Se Ho P, Kyong Sik L. Clinical breast examination for screening of asymptomatic women: the importance of clinical breast examination for breast cancer detection. Yonsei Med J. 2000;41:312–8.PubMed

Carney P, Miglioretti D, Yankaskas B, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):168–75.PubMed

Baines CJ, Bassett AA. Physical examination. Its role as a single screening modality in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Cancer. 1989;63(9):1816–22.PubMedCrossRef

Miller A, Baines C, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years. Can Med Assoc J. 1992;147(10):1459–76.

10.

Miller A, Baines C, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. Can Med Assoc J. 1992;147(10):1477–88.

11.

Baines CJ, Miller AB. Mammography versus clinical examination of the breasts. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;22:125–9.PubMed

12.

Lane D, Burg M. Promoting physician preventative practices: needs assessment for CME in breast cancer detection. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1989;9:245–56.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Warner S, Sorden J, Solomon L. Physician interest in breast cancer screening education. A survey of Vermont family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1989;29:281–5.PubMed

14.

Costanza M, Luckmann R, Quirk M, Clemow L, White M, Stoddard A. The effectiveness of using standardized patients to improve community physician skills in mammography counseling and clinical breast exam. Prev Med. 1999;29:241–8.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Fletcher S. Following up abnormal breast cancer screening results: lessons for primary care clinicians. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000;13(2):152–4.PubMed

16.

Saslow D, Hannan J, Osuch J, et al. Clinical breast examination: practical recommendations for optimizing performance and reporting. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(6):327–44.PubMedCrossRef

17.

McDonald S, Saslow D, Alciati M. Performance and reporting of clinical breast examination: a review of the literature. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(6):345–61.PubMed

18.

Fletcher SW, O’Malley MS, Bunce LA. Physicians’ abilities to detect lumps in silicone breast models. JAMA. 1985;253(15):2224–8.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Vetto JT, Petty JK, Dunn N, Prouser N, Austin D. Structured clinical breast examination (CBE) training results in objective improvement in CBE skills. J Cancer Educ. 2002;17(3):124–7.PubMed

20.

Oregon Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Algorithms for evaluation of abnormal findings. http://egov.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/bcc/diag/index.shtml. Accessed March 31, 2005.

21.

Barton M, Harris R, Fletcher S. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA. 1999;282:1270–80.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Campbell HS, Fletcher SW, Pilgrim CA, Morgan TM, Lin S. Improving physicians’ and nurses’ clinical breast examination: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 1991;7(1):1–8.PubMed

23.

Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1887–92.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Durning S, Cation L, Markert R, Pangara L. Assessing the reliability and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise for internal medicine residency training. Acad Med. 2002;77(9):900–4.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Dupras D, Li J. Use of an objective structured clinical examination to determine clinical competence. Acad Med. 1995;70:1029–34.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Cuddy M, Dillon G, Clauser B, et al. Assessing the validity of the USMLE step 2 clinical knowledge examination through an evaluation of its clinical relevance. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S43–5.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Carney PA, Dietrich AJ, Freeman DH Jr, Mott LA. A standardized-patient assessment of a continuing medical education program to improve physicians’ cancer-control clinical skills. Acad Med. 1995;70(1):52–8.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Data Sharing Project P. PIAA Breast Cancer Claims Study: Physicians’ Insurance Association of America; 2002. PIAA online store. http://www.shop.piaa.us.

Title: Detection and Description of Small Breast Masses by Residents Trained Using a Standardized Clinical Breast Exam Curriculum
Authors: Elizabeth Steiner, MD
Donald F. Austin, MD, MPH
Nancy C. Prouser, MS
Publication date: 01-02-2008
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0444-5

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Detection and Description of Small Breast Masses by Residents Trained Using a Standardized Clinical Breast Exam Curriculum

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

METHODS

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

METHODS

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

The Chief Complaint was Rat Bites

Foramen Magnum Meningioma: Dysphagia of Atypical Etiology

The Accuracy of Clinician Perceptions of “Usual” Blood Pressure Control

Why Oregon Patients Request Assisted Death: Family Members’ Views

Patient Expectations as Predictors of Outcome In Patients with Acute Low Back Pain

Clinical Research Training: Scientific Literacy for the Twenty-First Century

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

Incentivised to exercise

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page