Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2007

01-10-2007 | Original Article

Reducing Patients’ Unmet Concerns in Primary Care: the Difference One Word Can Make

Authors: John Heritage, PhD, Jeffrey D. Robinson, PhD, Marc N. Elliott, PhD, Megan Beckett, PhD, Michael Wilkes, MD PhD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 10/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Context

In primary, acute-care visits, patients frequently present with more than 1 concern. Various visit factors prevent additional concerns from being articulated and addressed.

Objective

To test an intervention to reduce patients’ unmet concerns.

Design

Cross-sectional comparison of 2 experimental questions, with videotaping of office visits and pre and postvisit surveys.

Setting

Twenty outpatient offices of community-based physicians equally divided between Los Angeles County and a midsized town in Pennsylvania.

Participants

A volunteer sample of 20 family physicians (participation rate = 80%) and 224 patients approached consecutively within physicians (participation rate = 73%; approximately 11 participating for each enrolled physician) seeking care for an acute condition.

Intervention

After seeing 4 nonintervention patients, physicians were randomly assigned to solicit additional concerns by asking 1 of the following 2 questions after patients presented their chief concern: “Is there anything else you want to address in the visit today?” (ANY condition) and “Is there something else you want to address in the visit today?” (SOME condition).

Main Outcome Measures

Patients’ unmet concerns: concerns listed on previsit surveys but not addressed during visits, visit time, unanticipated concerns: concerns that were addressed during the visit but not listed on previsit surveys.

Results

Relative to nonintervention cases, the implemented SOME intervention eliminated 78% of unmet concerns (odds ratio (OR) = .154, p = .001). The ANY intervention could not be significantly distinguished from the control condition (p = .122). Neither intervention affected visit length, or patients’; expression of unanticipated concerns not listed in previsit surveys.

Conclusions

Patients’ unmet concerns can be dramatically reduced by a simple inquiry framed in the SOME form. Both the learning and implementation of the intervention require very little time.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stewart M, Brown J, Levenstein J, McCracken E, McWhinney IR. The patient-centered clinical method, 3: changes in residents’ performance over two months of training. Fam Prac. 1986;3:164–7.CrossRef Stewart M, Brown J, Levenstein J, McCracken E, McWhinney IR. The patient-centered clinical method, 3: changes in residents’ performance over two months of training. Fam Prac. 1986;3:164–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kaplan SH, Gandek B, Greenfield S, Rogers W, Ware JE. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians’ participatory decision making style: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Medical Care. 1995;33:1176–87.PubMedCrossRef Kaplan SH, Gandek B, Greenfield S, Rogers W, Ware JE. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians’ participatory decision making style: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Medical Care. 1995;33:1176–87.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Beckman H, Frankel R. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:692–6.PubMed Beckman H, Frankel R. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:692–6.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman HB. Soliciting the patient’s agenda: Have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281(3):283–7.PubMedCrossRef Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman HB. Soliciting the patient’s agenda: Have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281(3):283–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Callahan E, Stange K, Zyzanski S, Goodwin M, Flocke S, Bertakis K. Physician-elder interaction in community family practice. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17(1):19–25.PubMedCrossRef Callahan E, Stange K, Zyzanski S, Goodwin M, Flocke S, Bertakis K. Physician-elder interaction in community family practice. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17(1):19–25.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference White J, Levinson W, Roter D. “Oh, by the way ...”: the closing moments of the medical visit. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9(1):24–8.PubMedCrossRef White J, Levinson W, Roter D. “Oh, by the way ...”: the closing moments of the medical visit. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9(1):24–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference White JC, Rosson C, Christensen J, Hart R, Levinson W. Wrapping things up: a qualitative analysis of the closing moments of the medical visit. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30:155–65.PubMedCrossRef White JC, Rosson C, Christensen J, Hart R, Levinson W. Wrapping things up: a qualitative analysis of the closing moments of the medical visit. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30:155–65.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lipkin M, Putnam S, Lazare A, eds. The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education And Research. New York: Springer; 1995. Lipkin M, Putnam S, Lazare A, eds. The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education And Research. New York: Springer; 1995.
9.
go back to reference Cohen-Cole SA. The medical interview: The three function approach. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991. Cohen-Cole SA. The medical interview: The three function approach. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991.
10.
11.
go back to reference Lipkin M, Frankel R, Beckman H, Charon R, Fein O. Performing the interview. In: Lipkin M, Putnam S, Lazare A, eds. The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education and Research. New York: Springer; 1995:65–82. Lipkin M, Frankel R, Beckman H, Charon R, Fein O. Performing the interview. In: Lipkin M, Putnam S, Lazare A, eds. The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education and Research. New York: Springer; 1995:65–82.
12.
go back to reference Seidel HM, Ball JW, Dains JE, Benedict GW. Mosby’s guide to physical examination. 3rd edn. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1995. Seidel HM, Ball JW, Dains JE, Benedict GW. Mosby’s guide to physical examination. 3rd edn. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1995.
13.
go back to reference Swartz MH. Textbook of Physical Diagnosis: History and Examination. 4th edn. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1998. Swartz MH. Textbook of Physical Diagnosis: History and Examination. 4th edn. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1998.
14.
go back to reference Schuman H, Presser S. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Questions Form, Wording and Context. Orlando FL: Academic; 1981. Schuman H, Presser S. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Questions Form, Wording and Context. Orlando FL: Academic; 1981.
15.
go back to reference Wellman FL. The Art of Cross-Examination. New York: Touchstone; 1997. Wellman FL. The Art of Cross-Examination. New York: Touchstone; 1997.
16.
go back to reference Loftus E. Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979. Loftus E. Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.
17.
go back to reference Clayman S, Heritage J. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. Clayman S, Heritage J. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
18.
go back to reference Boyd E, Heritage J. Taking the patient’s medical history: questioning during comprehensive history taking. In: Heritage J, Maynard D, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Boyd E, Heritage J. Taking the patient’s medical history: questioning during comprehensive history taking. In: Heritage J, Maynard D, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
19.
go back to reference Bolinger D. Interrogative Structures of American English. University, Alabama: University of Alabama Press; 1957. Bolinger D. Interrogative Structures of American English. University, Alabama: University of Alabama Press; 1957.
20.
go back to reference Borkin A. Polarity items in questions. Chicago Linguistic Society. 1971;7:53–62. Borkin A. Polarity items in questions. Chicago Linguistic Society. 1971;7:53–62.
21.
go back to reference Horn LR. Some Aspects of Negation. In: Greenberg JH, Ferguson CA, Moravscik EA, eds. Universals of Human Language, Vol.4: Syntax. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1978:127–210. Horn LR. Some Aspects of Negation. In: Greenberg JH, Ferguson CA, Moravscik EA, eds. Universals of Human Language, Vol.4: Syntax. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1978:127–210.
22.
23.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley; 1989. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley; 1989.
24.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 9.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation; 2005. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 9.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation; 2005.
25.
go back to reference Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000;56:645–6.PubMedCrossRef Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000;56:645–6.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48:817–30.CrossRef White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48:817–30.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000;56:645–6.PubMedCrossRef Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000;56:645–6.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cegala D, Broz L. Physician communication skills training: a review of theoretical backgrounds, objectives and skills. Med Educ. 2002;36:1004–6.PubMedCrossRef Cegala D, Broz L. Physician communication skills training: a review of theoretical backgrounds, objectives and skills. Med Educ. 2002;36:1004–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Baile W, Lenzi R, Kudelka A, et al. Improving physician-patient communication in cancer care: outcome of a workshop for oncologists. J Cancer Educ. 1997;12:166–73.PubMed Baile W, Lenzi R, Kudelka A, et al. Improving physician-patient communication in cancer care: outcome of a workshop for oncologists. J Cancer Educ. 1997;12:166–73.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Stein T, Kwan J. Thriving in a busy practice: physician-patient communication training. J Eff Clin Prac. 1999;2:63–70. Stein T, Kwan J. Thriving in a busy practice: physician-patient communication training. J Eff Clin Prac. 1999;2:63–70.
32.
go back to reference Joos SK, Hickam DH, Gordon GH, Baker LH. Effects of a physician communication intervention on patient care outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(3):147–55.PubMedCrossRef Joos SK, Hickam DH, Gordon GH, Baker LH. Effects of a physician communication intervention on patient care outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(3):147–55.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Street RL, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Medical Care. 2005;43(10):960–9.PubMedCrossRef Street RL, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Medical Care. 2005;43(10):960–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Cassell E. Talking with Patients, Volume 2: Clinical Technique. Cambridge MA: MIT; 1985. Cassell E. Talking with Patients, Volume 2: Clinical Technique. Cambridge MA: MIT; 1985.
35.
go back to reference Heritage J, Maynard DW, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Heritage J, Maynard DW, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
36.
go back to reference Stivers T. Prescribing Under Pressure: Parent-Physician Conversations and Antibiotics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007. Stivers T. Prescribing Under Pressure: Parent-Physician Conversations and Antibiotics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.
Metadata
Title
Reducing Patients’ Unmet Concerns in Primary Care: the Difference One Word Can Make
Authors
John Heritage, PhD
Jeffrey D. Robinson, PhD
Marc N. Elliott, PhD
Megan Beckett, PhD
Michael Wilkes, MD PhD
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 10/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2007 Go to the issue

Reflections

X-rays

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.