Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2007

01-10-2007 | Original Article

Does Affiliation of Physician Groups with One Another Produce Higher Quality Primary Care?

Authors: Mark W. Friedberg, MD, MPP, Kathryn L. Coltin, MPH, Steven D. Pearson, MD, MSc, Ken P. Kleinman, ScD, Jie Zheng, PhD, Janice A. Singer, MPH, MA, Eric C. Schneider, MD, MSc

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 10/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Recent reports have emphasized the importance of delivery systems in improving health care quality. However, few prior studies have assessed differences in primary care quality between physician groups that differ in size and organizational configuration. We examined whether larger physician group size and affiliation with networks of multiple groups are associated with higher quality of care.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional observational analysis of 132 physician groups (including 4,358 physicians) who delivered primary care services in Massachusetts in 2002. We compared physician groups on performance scores for 12 Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures reflecting processes of adult primary care.

Results

Network-affiliated physician groups had higher performance scores than non-affiliated groups for 10 of the 12 HEDIS measures (p < 0.05). There was no consistent relationship between group size and performance scores. Multivariable models including group size, network affiliation, and health plan showed that network-affiliated groups had higher performance scores than non-affiliated groups on 8 of the 12 HEDIS measures (p < 0.05), and larger group size was not associated with higher performance scores. Adjusted differences in the performance scores of network-affiliated and non-affiliated groups ranged from 2% to 15%. For 4 HEDIS measures related to diabetes care, performance score differences between network-affiliated and non-affiliated groups were most apparent among the smallest groups.

Conclusions

Physician group affiliation with networks of multiple groups was associated with higher quality, and for measures of diabetes care the quality advantage of network-affiliation was most evident among smaller physician groups.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
2.
go back to reference Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality: Institute of Medicine national roundtable on health care quality. JAMA 1998;280:1000–5.PubMedCrossRef Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality: Institute of Medicine national roundtable on health care quality. JAMA 1998;280:1000–5.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q 1998;76:517–63.PubMedCrossRef Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q 1998;76:517–63.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Robinson JC. Consolidation of medical groups into physician practice management organizations. JAMA 1998;279:144–49.PubMedCrossRef Robinson JC. Consolidation of medical groups into physician practice management organizations. JAMA 1998;279:144–49.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Casalino LP, Devers KJ, Lake TK, et al. Benefits of and barriers to large medical group practice in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1958–64.PubMedCrossRef Casalino LP, Devers KJ, Lake TK, et al. Benefits of and barriers to large medical group practice in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1958–64.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shortell SM, Schmittdiel J. Prepaid groups and organized delivery systems: promise, performance, and potential. In: Enthoven AC, Tollen LA, eds. Toward a 21st Century Health System: the Contributions and Promise of Prepaid Group Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2004:1–21. Shortell SM, Schmittdiel J. Prepaid groups and organized delivery systems: promise, performance, and potential. In: Enthoven AC, Tollen LA, eds. Toward a 21st Century Health System: the Contributions and Promise of Prepaid Group Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2004:1–21.
7.
go back to reference Berwick DM, Jain SH. The basis for quality care in prepaid group practice. In: Enthoven AC, Tollen LA, eds. Toward a 21st Century Health System: the Contributions and Promise of Prepaid Group Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2004:22–44. Berwick DM, Jain SH. The basis for quality care in prepaid group practice. In: Enthoven AC, Tollen LA, eds. Toward a 21st Century Health System: the Contributions and Promise of Prepaid Group Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2004:22–44.
8.
go back to reference Chuang KH, Luft HS, Dudley RA. The clinical and economic performance of prepaid group practice. In: Enthoven AC, Tollen LA, eds. Toward a 21st Century Health System: the Contributions and Promise of Prepaid Group Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2004:45–60. Chuang KH, Luft HS, Dudley RA. The clinical and economic performance of prepaid group practice. In: Enthoven AC, Tollen LA, eds. Toward a 21st Century Health System: the Contributions and Promise of Prepaid Group Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2004:45–60.
9.
go back to reference Lawrence D. From chaos to care: the promise of team-based medicine. United States of America: Perseus Publishing; 2002. Lawrence D. From chaos to care: the promise of team-based medicine. United States of America: Perseus Publishing; 2002.
10.
11.
go back to reference Miller RH, Bovbjerg RR. Efforts to improve patient safety in large, capitated medical groups: description and conceptual model. J Health Polit Policy Law 2002;27:401–40.PubMedCrossRef Miller RH, Bovbjerg RR. Efforts to improve patient safety in large, capitated medical groups: description and conceptual model. J Health Polit Policy Law 2002;27:401–40.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Burns LR. Medical organization structures that promote quality and efficiency: past research and future considerations. Qual Manag Health Care 1995;3:10–18.PubMed Burns LR. Medical organization structures that promote quality and efficiency: past research and future considerations. Qual Manag Health Care 1995;3:10–18.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Casalino L, Gillies RR, Shortell SM, et al. External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. JAMA 2003;289:434–41.PubMedCrossRef Casalino L, Gillies RR, Shortell SM, et al. External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. JAMA 2003;289:434–41.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Barr DA. The effects of organizational structure on primary care outcomes under managed care. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:353–9.PubMed Barr DA. The effects of organizational structure on primary care outcomes under managed care. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:353–9.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Shortell SM. Increasing value: a research agenda for addressing the managerial and organizational challenges facing health care in the United States. Med Care Res Rev 2004;61:12S–30S.PubMedCrossRef Shortell SM. Increasing value: a research agenda for addressing the managerial and organizational challenges facing health care in the United States. Med Care Res Rev 2004;61:12S–30S.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:441–50.PubMedCrossRef Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:441–50.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medical errors. JAMA 2005;293:1197–203.PubMedCrossRef Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medical errors. JAMA 2005;293:1197–203.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Audet A, Doty MM, Shamasdin J, et al. Measure, learn, and improve: physicians’ involvement in quality improvement. Health Aff 2005;24:843–53.CrossRef Audet A, Doty MM, Shamasdin J, et al. Measure, learn, and improve: physicians’ involvement in quality improvement. Health Aff 2005;24:843–53.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rittenhouse DR, Grumbach K, O’Neill EH, et al. Physician organization and care management in California: from cottage to Kaiser. Health Aff 2004;23:51–62.CrossRef Rittenhouse DR, Grumbach K, O’Neill EH, et al. Physician organization and care management in California: from cottage to Kaiser. Health Aff 2004;23:51–62.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chehab EL, Panicker N, Alper PR, et al. The impact of practice setting on physician perceptions of the quality of practice and patient care in the managed care era. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:202–11.PubMedCrossRef Chehab EL, Panicker N, Alper PR, et al. The impact of practice setting on physician perceptions of the quality of practice and patient care in the managed care era. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:202–11.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pham HH, Schrag D, Hargraves JL, et al. Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians. JAMA 2005;294:473–81.PubMedCrossRef Pham HH, Schrag D, Hargraves JL, et al. Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians. JAMA 2005;294:473–81.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Spoeri RK, Ullman R. Measuring and reporting managed care performance: lessons learned and new initiatives. Ann Intern Med 1997;127(8, pt 2):726–32.PubMed Spoeri RK, Ullman R. Measuring and reporting managed care performance: lessons learned and new initiatives. Ann Intern Med 1997;127(8, pt 2):726–32.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Zeger S, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986;42:121–30.PubMedCrossRef Zeger S, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 1986;42:121–30.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Liang KY, Zeger S. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13–22.CrossRef Liang KY, Zeger S. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;73:13–22.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zaslavsky AM, Hochheimer JN, Schneider EC, et al. Impact of sociodemographic case mix on the HEDIS measures of health plan quality. Med Care 2000;38:981–92.PubMedCrossRef Zaslavsky AM, Hochheimer JN, Schneider EC, et al. Impact of sociodemographic case mix on the HEDIS measures of health plan quality. Med Care 2000;38:981–92.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Schneider EC, Zaslavsky AM, Epstein AM. Racial disparities in the quality of care for enrollees in Medicare managed care. JAMA 2002;287:1288–94.PubMedCrossRef Schneider EC, Zaslavsky AM, Epstein AM. Racial disparities in the quality of care for enrollees in Medicare managed care. JAMA 2002;287:1288–94.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Performance Measurement: Accelerating Improvement. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006. Institute of Medicine. Performance Measurement: Accelerating Improvement. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
29.
go back to reference Schneider EC, Zaslavsky AM, Landon BE, et al. National quality monitoring of medicare health plans: the relationship between enrollees’ reports and the quality of care. Med Care 2001;39:1313–25.PubMedCrossRef Schneider EC, Zaslavsky AM, Landon BE, et al. National quality monitoring of medicare health plans: the relationship between enrollees’ reports and the quality of care. Med Care 2001;39:1313–25.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Werner RM, Bradlow ET. Relationship between Medicare’s hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates. JAMA 2006;296:2694–702.PubMedCrossRef Werner RM, Bradlow ET. Relationship between Medicare’s hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates. JAMA 2006;296:2694–702.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does Affiliation of Physician Groups with One Another Produce Higher Quality Primary Care?
Authors
Mark W. Friedberg, MD, MPP
Kathryn L. Coltin, MPH
Steven D. Pearson, MD, MSc
Ken P. Kleinman, ScD
Jie Zheng, PhD
Janice A. Singer, MPH, MA
Eric C. Schneider, MD, MSc
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 10/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0234-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2007 Go to the issue