Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2007

01-05-2007 | Original Article

Why do General Practitioners Decline Training to Improve Management of Medically Unexplained Symptoms?

Authors: Peter Salmon, DPhil, Sarah Peters, PhD, Rebecca Clifford, PhD, Wendy Iredale, BSc, Linda Gask, MD, Anne Rogers, PhD, Christopher Dowrick, MD, John Hughes, BSc, Richard Morriss, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Background

General practitioners’ (GPs) communication with patients presenting medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) has the potential to somatize patients’ problems and intensify dependence on medical care. Several reports indicate that GPs have negative attitudes about patients with MUS. If these attitudes deter participation in training or other methods to improve communication, practitioners who most need help will not receive it.

Objective

To identify how GPs’ attitudes to patients with MUS might inhibit their participation with training to improve management.

Design

Qualitative study.

Participants

GPs (N = 33) who had declined or accepted training in reattribution techniques in the context of a research trial.

Approach

GPs were interviewed and their accounts analysed qualitatively.

Results

Although attitudes that devalued patients with MUS were common in practitioners who had declined training, these coexisted, in the same practitioners, with evidence of intuitive and elaborate psychological work with these patients. However, these practitioners devalued their psychological skills. GPs who had accepted training also described working psychologically with MUS but devalued neither patients with MUS nor their own psychological skills.

Conclusions

GPs’ attitudes that suggested disengagement from patients with MUS belied their pursuit of psychological objectives. We therefore suggest that, whereas negative attitudes to patients have previously been regarded as the main barrier to involvement in measures to improve patient management, GPs devaluing of their own psychological skills with these patients may be more important.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Burton C. Beyond somatisation: a review of the understanding and treatment of medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS). Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53(488):231–9.PubMed Burton C. Beyond somatisation: a review of the understanding and treatment of medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS). Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53(488):231–9.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Reid S, Whooley D, Crayford T, Hotopf M. Medically unexplained symptoms-GPs’ attitudes towards their cause and management. Fam Pract. 2001;18(5):519–23.PubMedCrossRef Reid S, Whooley D, Crayford T, Hotopf M. Medically unexplained symptoms-GPs’ attitudes towards their cause and management. Fam Pract. 2001;18(5):519–23.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith GR, Jr, Monson RA, Ray DC. Patients with multiple unexplained symptoms. Their characteristics, functional health, and health care utilization. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(1):69–72.PubMedCrossRef Smith GR, Jr, Monson RA, Ray DC. Patients with multiple unexplained symptoms. Their characteristics, functional health, and health care utilization. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(1):69–72.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stanley IM, Peters S, Salmon P. A primary care perspective on prevailing assumptions about persistent medically unexplained physical symptoms. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2002;32(2):125–40.PubMedCrossRef Stanley IM, Peters S, Salmon P. A primary care perspective on prevailing assumptions about persistent medically unexplained physical symptoms. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2002;32(2):125–40.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Garcia-Campayo J, Sanz-Carrillo C, Yoldi-Elcid A, Lopez-Aylon R, Monton C. Management of somatisers in primary care: are general doctors motivated? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1998;32(4):528–33.PubMedCrossRef Garcia-Campayo J, Sanz-Carrillo C, Yoldi-Elcid A, Lopez-Aylon R, Monton C. Management of somatisers in primary care: are general doctors motivated? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1998;32(4):528–33.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hahn SR, Thompson KS, Wills TA, Stern V, Budner NS. The difficult doctor–patient relationship: somatization, personality and psychopathology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(6):647–57.PubMedCrossRef Hahn SR, Thompson KS, Wills TA, Stern V, Budner NS. The difficult doctor–patient relationship: somatization, personality and psychopathology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(6):647–57.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hartz AJ, Noyes R, Bentler SE, Damiano PC, Willard JC, Momany ET. Unexplained symptoms in primary care: perspectives of doctors and patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000;22(3):144–52.PubMedCrossRef Hartz AJ, Noyes R, Bentler SE, Damiano PC, Willard JC, Momany ET. Unexplained symptoms in primary care: perspectives of doctors and patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000;22(3):144–52.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wileman L, May C, Chew-Graham CA. Medically unexplained symptoms and the problem of power in the primary care consultation: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2002;19(2):178–82.PubMedCrossRef Wileman L, May C, Chew-Graham CA. Medically unexplained symptoms and the problem of power in the primary care consultation: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2002;19(2):178–82.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Barsky AJ, Ettner SL, Horsky J, Bates DW. Resource utilization of patients with hypochondriacal health anxiety and somatization. Med Care. 2001;39(7):705–15.PubMedCrossRef Barsky AJ, Ettner SL, Horsky J, Bates DW. Resource utilization of patients with hypochondriacal health anxiety and somatization. Med Care. 2001;39(7):705–15.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Barsky AJ, Orav EJ, Bates DW. Somatization increases medical utilization and costs independent of psychiatric and medical comorbidity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(8):903–10.PubMedCrossRef Barsky AJ, Orav EJ, Bates DW. Somatization increases medical utilization and costs independent of psychiatric and medical comorbidity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(8):903–10.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kroenke K, Mangelsdorff AD. Common symptoms in ambulatory care: incidence, evaluation, therapy, and outcome. Am J Med. 1989;86(3):262–6.PubMedCrossRef Kroenke K, Mangelsdorff AD. Common symptoms in ambulatory care: incidence, evaluation, therapy, and outcome. Am J Med. 1989;86(3):262–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Barsky AJ, Borus JF. Functional somatic syndromes. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(11):910–21.PubMed Barsky AJ, Borus JF. Functional somatic syndromes. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(11):910–21.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Kihlstrom JF, Cantor Kihlstrom L. Somatization as illness behavior. Adv Mind Body Med. 2001;17(4):240–3; discussion 270–6.PubMed Kihlstrom JF, Cantor Kihlstrom L. Somatization as illness behavior. Adv Mind Body Med. 2001;17(4):240–3; discussion 270–6.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Page LA, Wessely S. Medically unexplained symptoms: exacerbating factors in the doctor–patient encounter. J R Soc Med. 2003;96(5):223–7.PubMedCrossRef Page LA, Wessely S. Medically unexplained symptoms: exacerbating factors in the doctor–patient encounter. J R Soc Med. 2003;96(5):223–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wessely S, Nimnuan C, Sharpe M. Functional somatic syndromes: one or many? Lancet. 1999;354(9182):936–9.PubMedCrossRef Wessely S, Nimnuan C, Sharpe M. Functional somatic syndromes: one or many? Lancet. 1999;354(9182):936–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Salmon P. The potentially somatizing effect of clinical consultation. CNS Spectr. 2006;11(3):190–200.PubMed Salmon P. The potentially somatizing effect of clinical consultation. CNS Spectr. 2006;11(3):190–200.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Ring A, Dowrick CF, Humphris GM, Davies J, Salmon P. The somatising effect of clinical consultation: What patients and doctors say and do not say when patients present medically unexplained physical symptoms. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(7):1505–15.PubMedCrossRef Ring A, Dowrick CF, Humphris GM, Davies J, Salmon P. The somatising effect of clinical consultation: What patients and doctors say and do not say when patients present medically unexplained physical symptoms. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(7):1505–15.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kerwick S, Jones R, Mann A, Goldberg D. Mental health care training priorities in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47(417):225–7.PubMed Kerwick S, Jones R, Mann A, Goldberg D. Mental health care training priorities in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47(417):225–7.PubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Steinmetz D, Tabenkin H. The ‘difficult patient’ as perceived by general physicians. Fam Pract. 2001;18(5):495–500.PubMedCrossRef Steinmetz D, Tabenkin H. The ‘difficult patient’ as perceived by general physicians. Fam Pract. 2001;18(5):495–500.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Larisch A, Schweickhardt A, Wirsching M, Fritzsche K. Psychosocial interventions for somatizing patients by the general practitioner—A randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57(6):507–14.PubMedCrossRef Larisch A, Schweickhardt A, Wirsching M, Fritzsche K. Psychosocial interventions for somatizing patients by the general practitioner—A randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57(6):507–14.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Morriss R, Gask L, Ronalds C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a new treatment for somatized mental disorder taught to GPs. Fam Pract. 1998;15(2):119–25.PubMedCrossRef Morriss R, Gask L, Ronalds C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a new treatment for somatized mental disorder taught to GPs. Fam Pract. 1998;15(2):119–25.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Morriss RK, Gask L. Treatment of patients with somatized mental disorder: effects of reattribution training on outcomes under the direct control of the general doctor. Psychosomatics. 2002;43(5):394–9.PubMedCrossRef Morriss RK, Gask L. Treatment of patients with somatized mental disorder: effects of reattribution training on outcomes under the direct control of the general doctor. Psychosomatics. 2002;43(5):394–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Blair IV. The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2002;6(3):242–61.CrossRef Blair IV. The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2002;6(3):242–61.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Morriss R, Gask L, Dowrick C, et al. Turning theory into practice: rationale, feasibility and external validity of an exploratory randomised controlled trial of training general practitioners in reattribution to manage patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUST). Gen Hosp Psych. 2006; Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006; 28(4):343–351. Morriss R, Gask L, Dowrick C, et al. Turning theory into practice: rationale, feasibility and external validity of an exploratory randomised controlled trial of training general practitioners in reattribution to manage patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUST). Gen Hosp Psych. 2006; Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006; 28(4):343–351.
26.
go back to reference Henwood KL, Pidgeon NF. Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. Br J Psychol. 1992;83:97–111.PubMed Henwood KL, Pidgeon NF. Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. Br J Psychol. 1992;83:97–111.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Stiles WB. Quality-control in qualitative research. Clin Psychol Rev. 1993;13(6):593–618.CrossRef Stiles WB. Quality-control in qualitative research. Clin Psychol Rev. 1993;13(6):593–618.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gwyn R. Communicating Health and Illness. London: Sage; 2002. Gwyn R. Communicating Health and Illness. London: Sage; 2002.
29.
go back to reference Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL. Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields (vol 38, pg 215, 1999). Br J Clin Psychol. 2000;39:10. Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL. Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields (vol 38, pg 215, 1999). Br J Clin Psychol. 2000;39:10.
30.
go back to reference Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001;322(7294):1115–7.PubMedCrossRef Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ. 2001;322(7294):1115–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Salmon P. How do we recognise good research? Psychologist. 2003;16(1):24–7. Salmon P. How do we recognise good research? Psychologist. 2003;16(1):24–7.
32.
go back to reference Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1989. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1989.
33.
go back to reference Chew-Graham C, May C. Chronic low back pain in general practice: the challenge of the consultation. Fam Pract. 1999;16(1):46–9.PubMedCrossRef Chew-Graham C, May C. Chronic low back pain in general practice: the challenge of the consultation. Fam Pract. 1999;16(1):46–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Woivalin T, Krantz G, Mantyranta T, Ringsberg KC. Medically unexplained symptoms: perceptions of physicians in primary health care. Fam Pract. 2004;21(2):199–203.PubMedCrossRef Woivalin T, Krantz G, Mantyranta T, Ringsberg KC. Medically unexplained symptoms: perceptions of physicians in primary health care. Fam Pract. 2004;21(2):199–203.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Cocksedge S, May C. Pastoral and holding work in primary care: affect, subjectivity and chronicity. Chronic Illness. 2005;1:157–63.PubMed Cocksedge S, May C. Pastoral and holding work in primary care: affect, subjectivity and chronicity. Chronic Illness. 2005;1:157–63.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Byrne A, Morton J, Salmon P. Defending against patients’ pain: a qualitative analysis of nurses’ responses to children’s postoperative pain. J Psychosom Res. 2001;50(2):69–76.PubMedCrossRef Byrne A, Morton J, Salmon P. Defending against patients’ pain: a qualitative analysis of nurses’ responses to children’s postoperative pain. J Psychosom Res. 2001;50(2):69–76.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ringsberg KC, Krantz G. Coping with patients with medically unexplained symptoms — Work-related strategies of physicians in primary health care. J Health Psychol. 2006;11(1):107–16.PubMedCrossRef Ringsberg KC, Krantz G. Coping with patients with medically unexplained symptoms — Work-related strategies of physicians in primary health care. J Health Psychol. 2006;11(1):107–16.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sharpe M, Mayou R, Seagroatt V, et al. Why do doctors find some patients difficult to help? Q J Med. 1994;87(3):187–93.PubMed Sharpe M, Mayou R, Seagroatt V, et al. Why do doctors find some patients difficult to help? Q J Med. 1994;87(3):187–93.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Salmon P, Ring A, Dowrick CF, Humphris GM. What do general practice patients want when they present medically unexplained symptoms, and why do their doctors feel pressurized? J Psychosom Res. 2005;59(4):255–60.PubMedCrossRef Salmon P, Ring A, Dowrick CF, Humphris GM. What do general practice patients want when they present medically unexplained symptoms, and why do their doctors feel pressurized? J Psychosom Res. 2005;59(4):255–60.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1957. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1957.
41.
go back to reference Mathers N, Rowland S. General practice—a post-modern specialty? Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47(416):177–9.PubMed Mathers N, Rowland S. General practice—a post-modern specialty? Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47(416):177–9.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Dowrick C, May C, Richardson M, Bundred P. The biopsychosocial model of general practice: rhetoric or reality? Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46(403):105–7.PubMed Dowrick C, May C, Richardson M, Bundred P. The biopsychosocial model of general practice: rhetoric or reality? Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46(403):105–7.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Chew-Graham C. Why do doctors feel pressurized? J Psychosom Res. 2005;59(4):261–2.CrossRef Chew-Graham C. Why do doctors feel pressurized? J Psychosom Res. 2005;59(4):261–2.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Chew-Graham CA, May CR, Roland MO. The harmful consequences of elevating the doctor–patient relationship to be a primary goal of the general practice consultation. Fam Pract. 2004;21(3):229–31.PubMedCrossRef Chew-Graham CA, May CR, Roland MO. The harmful consequences of elevating the doctor–patient relationship to be a primary goal of the general practice consultation. Fam Pract. 2004;21(3):229–31.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Epstein RM, Quill TE, McWhinney IR. Somatization reconsidered: incorporating the patient’s experience of illness. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(3):215–22.PubMedCrossRef Epstein RM, Quill TE, McWhinney IR. Somatization reconsidered: incorporating the patient’s experience of illness. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(3):215–22.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Mathers N, Jones N, Hannay D. Heartsink patients: a study of their general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45(395):293–6.PubMed Mathers N, Jones N, Hannay D. Heartsink patients: a study of their general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45(395):293–6.PubMed
47.
go back to reference McDaniel SH, Campbell TL, Seaburn DB. Ch 16: Integrating the mind–body split: a biopsychosocial approach to somatic fixation. General-Oriented Primary Care: A Manual for Medical Providers. NY: Springer-Verlag; 1990:248–62. McDaniel SH, Campbell TL, Seaburn DB. Ch 16: Integrating the mind–body split: a biopsychosocial approach to somatic fixation. General-Oriented Primary Care: A Manual for Medical Providers. NY: Springer-Verlag; 1990:248–62.
Metadata
Title
Why do General Practitioners Decline Training to Improve Management of Medically Unexplained Symptoms?
Authors
Peter Salmon, DPhil
Sarah Peters, PhD
Rebecca Clifford, PhD
Wendy Iredale, BSc
Linda Gask, MD
Anne Rogers, PhD
Christopher Dowrick, MD
John Hughes, BSc
Richard Morriss, MD
Publication date
01-05-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0094-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2007 Go to the issue

Original Article

Do Doctors Vote?

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.