Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2023

18-01-2023 | Computed Tomography | Original Article

Clinical Implications of FDG-PET in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy

Authors: Naoki Ikenaga, Kohei Nakata, Masataka Hayashi, So Nakamura, Toshiya Abe, Noboru Ideno, Masatoshi Murakami, Nao Fujimori, Nobuhiro Fujita, Takuro Isoda, Shingo Baba, Kousei Ishigami, Yoshinao Oda, Masafumi Nakamura

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods

Among 285 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 2015 and 2021, 86 who underwent preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography after completion of neoadjuvant treatment were reviewed. Among preoperative factors, including post-treatment maximum standardized uptake value, predictors of early recurrence and poor prognosis were identified using multivariate analysis for decision making in surgery.

Results

Nineteen (22%) patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma demonstrated high maximum standardized uptake (≥ 4.5). High post-treatment maximum standardized uptake (≥ 4.5) predicted early recurrence within 6 months after surgery and correlated with shorter recurrence-free survival. Elevated post-treatment CA19-9 level (> 37 U/ml) and maximum standardized uptake ≥ 4.5 were independent prognostic factors. Post-treatment, a high maximum standardized uptake value indicated a poorer prognosis than a low maximum standardized uptake value in both patients with elevated CA19-9 and normal CA19-9 levels. The median overall survival in patients with elevated post-treatment CA19-9 and high maximum standardized uptake was only 17 months; 67% experienced early recurrence. Dynamic changes in maximum standardized uptake during neoadjuvant therapy were correlated with pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy, but not with radiological response or change in CA19-9 level.

Conclusions

Post-treatment assessment using maximum standardized uptake value is useful for stratifying patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who will benefit from surgery. Instead of subsequent curative resection, additional neoadjuvant therapy should be considered in patients with a persistently high maximum standardized uptake value.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Matsumoto I, Murakami Y, Shinzeki M, et al. Proposed preoperative risk factors for early recurrence in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after surgical resection: a multi-center retrospective study. Pancreatology 2015;15:674-680.PubMedCrossRef Matsumoto I, Murakami Y, Shinzeki M, et al. Proposed preoperative risk factors for early recurrence in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after surgical resection: a multi-center retrospective study. Pancreatology 2015;15:674-680.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ono S, Adachi T, Ohtsuka T, et al. Predictive factors for early recurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer: a multicenter retrospective study. Surgery 2022;172:1782-1790.PubMedCrossRef Ono S, Adachi T, Ohtsuka T, et al. Predictive factors for early recurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer: a multicenter retrospective study. Surgery 2022;172:1782-1790.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Uesaka K, Boku N, Fukutomi A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01). The Lancet 2016;388:248-257.CrossRef Uesaka K, Boku N, Fukutomi A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01). The Lancet 2016;388:248-257.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Palmer DH, Ghaneh P, et al. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017;389:1011-1024.PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Palmer DH, Ghaneh P, et al. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017;389:1011-1024.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2395-2406.PubMedCrossRef Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2395-2406.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Unno M, Motoi F, Matsuyama Y. Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer(Prep-02/JSAP05). J Clin Oncol 2019;37(suppl 4):abstr 189.CrossRef Unno M, Motoi F, Matsuyama Y. Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer(Prep-02/JSAP05). J Clin Oncol 2019;37(suppl 4):abstr 189.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Versteijne E, van Dam JL, Suker M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: long-term results of the Dutch randomized PREOPANC Trial. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:1220-1230.PubMedCrossRef Versteijne E, van Dam JL, Suker M, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: long-term results of the Dutch randomized PREOPANC Trial. J Clin Oncol 2022;40:1220-1230.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Chiorean EG, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 1.2019. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019;17:202-210.PubMedCrossRef Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Chiorean EG, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 1.2019. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019;17:202-210.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ushida Y, Inoue Y, Ito H, et al. High CA19-9 level in resectable pancreatic cancer is a potential indication of neoadjuvant treatment. Pancreatology 2021;21:130-137.PubMedCrossRef Ushida Y, Inoue Y, Ito H, et al. High CA19-9 level in resectable pancreatic cancer is a potential indication of neoadjuvant treatment. Pancreatology 2021;21:130-137.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Takahashi H, Yamada D, Asukai K, et al. Clinical implications of the serum CA19-9 level in "biological borderline resectability" and "biological downstaging" in the setting of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2020;20:919-928.PubMedCrossRef Takahashi H, Yamada D, Asukai K, et al. Clinical implications of the serum CA19-9 level in "biological borderline resectability" and "biological downstaging" in the setting of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2020;20:919-928.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tsai S, George B, Wittmann D, et al. Importance of normalization of CA19-9 levels following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 2020;271:740-747.PubMedCrossRef Tsai S, George B, Wittmann D, et al. Importance of normalization of CA19-9 levels following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 2020;271:740-747.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Aoki S, Motoi F, Murakami Y, et al. Decreased serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels after neoadjuvant therapy predict a better prognosis for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multicenter case-control study of 240 patients. BMC Cancer 2019;19:252.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Aoki S, Motoi F, Murakami Y, et al. Decreased serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels after neoadjuvant therapy predict a better prognosis for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multicenter case-control study of 240 patients. BMC Cancer 2019;19:252.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Shields AF, et al. Relationship between cancer type and impact of PET and PET/CT on intended management: findings of the national oncologic PET registry. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1928-1935.PubMedCrossRef Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Shields AF, et al. Relationship between cancer type and impact of PET and PET/CT on intended management: findings of the national oncologic PET registry. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1928-1935.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Higuchi T, Nishimukai A, Ozawa H, et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT for breast cancer subtypes. Breast 2016;30:5-12.PubMedCrossRef Higuchi T, Nishimukai A, Ozawa H, et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT for breast cancer subtypes. Breast 2016;30:5-12.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tabata K, Nishie A, Shimomura Y, et al. Prediction of pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron-emission tomography. Clin Radiol 2022;77:436-442.PubMedCrossRef Tabata K, Nishie A, Shimomura Y, et al. Prediction of pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron-emission tomography. Clin Radiol 2022;77:436-442.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Evangelista L, Zucchetta P, Moletta L, et al. The role of FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy for patients with borderline or resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic literature review. Ann Nucl Med 2021;35:767-776.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Evangelista L, Zucchetta P, Moletta L, et al. The role of FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy for patients with borderline or resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic literature review. Ann Nucl Med 2021;35:767-776.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sperti C, Friziero A, Serafini S, et al. Prognostic implications of 18-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography in resectable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Med 2020;9:2169.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sperti C, Friziero A, Serafini S, et al. Prognostic implications of 18-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography in resectable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Med 2020;9:2169.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228-247.PubMedCrossRef Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228-247.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Evans DB, Rich TA, Byrd DR, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg 1992;127:1335-1339.PubMedCrossRef Evans DB, Rich TA, Byrd DR, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Arch Surg 1992;127:1335-1339.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Abe T, Nakata K, Kibe S, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative nutritional and immunological factors in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:3996-4003.PubMedCrossRef Abe T, Nakata K, Kibe S, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative nutritional and immunological factors in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:3996-4003.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kim TH, Han SS, Park SJ, et al. CA 19-9 level as indicator of early distant metastasis and therapeutic selection in resected pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;81:e743-e748.PubMedCrossRef Kim TH, Han SS, Park SJ, et al. CA 19-9 level as indicator of early distant metastasis and therapeutic selection in resected pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;81:e743-e748.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Groot VP, Gemenetzis G, Blair AB, et al. Defining and Predicting Early Recurrence in 957 Patients With Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2019;269:1154-1162.PubMedCrossRef Groot VP, Gemenetzis G, Blair AB, et al. Defining and Predicting Early Recurrence in 957 Patients With Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2019;269:1154-1162.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yamamoto Y, Ikoma H, Morimura R, et al. Optimal duration of the early and late recurrence of pancreatic cancer after pancreatectomy based on the difference in the prognosis. Pancreatology 2014;14:524-529.PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto Y, Ikoma H, Morimura R, et al. Optimal duration of the early and late recurrence of pancreatic cancer after pancreatectomy based on the difference in the prognosis. Pancreatology 2014;14:524-529.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sugiura T, Uesaka K, Kanemoto H, et al. Serum CA19-9 is a significant predictor among preoperative parameters for early recurrence after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:977-985.PubMedCrossRef Sugiura T, Uesaka K, Kanemoto H, et al. Serum CA19-9 is a significant predictor among preoperative parameters for early recurrence after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:977-985.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Suker M, Beumer BR, Sadot E, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:801-810.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Suker M, Beumer BR, Sadot E, et al. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:801-810.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ioka T, Furuse J, Fukutomi A, et al. Randomized phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with versus without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial, JCOG1106. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021;51:235-243.PubMedCrossRef Ioka T, Furuse J, Fukutomi A, et al. Randomized phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with versus without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial, JCOG1106. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021;51:235-243.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tsuchida H, Fujii T, Mizuma M, et al. Prognostic importance of peritoneal washing cytology in patients with otherwise resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatectomy: a nationwide, cancer registry-based study from the Japan Pancreas Society. Surgery 2019;166:997-1003.PubMedCrossRef Tsuchida H, Fujii T, Mizuma M, et al. Prognostic importance of peritoneal washing cytology in patients with otherwise resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatectomy: a nationwide, cancer registry-based study from the Japan Pancreas Society. Surgery 2019;166:997-1003.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Farma JM, Santillan AA, Melis M, et al. PET/CT fusion scan enhances CT staging in patients with pancreatic neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:2465-2471.PubMedCrossRef Farma JM, Santillan AA, Melis M, et al. PET/CT fusion scan enhances CT staging in patients with pancreatic neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:2465-2471.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Moon D, Kim H, Han Y, et al. Preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and standard uptake value of positron emission tomography-computed tomography as prognostic markers in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022;29:1133-1141.PubMedCrossRef Moon D, Kim H, Han Y, et al. Preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and standard uptake value of positron emission tomography-computed tomography as prognostic markers in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022;29:1133-1141.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Yamamoto T, Sugiura T, Mizuno T, et al. Preoperative FDG-PET predicts early recurrence and a poor prognosis after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:677-684.PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto T, Sugiura T, Mizuno T, et al. Preoperative FDG-PET predicts early recurrence and a poor prognosis after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:677-684.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ariake K, Motoi F, Shimomura H, et al. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Recurrence in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2018;22:279-287.PubMedCrossRef Ariake K, Motoi F, Shimomura H, et al. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Recurrence in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2018;22:279-287.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Yokose T, Kitago M, Matsusaka Y, et al. Usefulness of (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for predicting the prognosis and treatment response of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Med 2020;9:4059-4068.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yokose T, Kitago M, Matsusaka Y, et al. Usefulness of (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for predicting the prognosis and treatment response of neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Med 2020;9:4059-4068.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Akita H, Takahashi H, Ohigashi H, et al. FDG-PET predicts treatment efficacy and surgical outcome of pre-operative chemoradiation therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017;43:1061-1067.PubMedCrossRef Akita H, Takahashi H, Ohigashi H, et al. FDG-PET predicts treatment efficacy and surgical outcome of pre-operative chemoradiation therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017;43:1061-1067.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kittaka H, Takahashi H, Ohigashi H, et al. Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in predicting the pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy in patients with resectable T3 pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 2013;37:169-178.PubMedCrossRef Kittaka H, Takahashi H, Ohigashi H, et al. Role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in predicting the pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy in patients with resectable T3 pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 2013;37:169-178.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Panda A, Garg I, Truty MJ, et al. Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: FDG PET/MRI and CT Tumor Metrics for Assessment of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Prediction of Survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021;217:730-740.PubMedCrossRef Panda A, Garg I, Truty MJ, et al. Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: FDG PET/MRI and CT Tumor Metrics for Assessment of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Prediction of Survival. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021;217:730-740.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Akita H, Takahashi H, Eguchi H, et al. Difference between carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in evaluating the treatment efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results of a dual-center study. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021;5:381-389.PubMedCrossRef Akita H, Takahashi H, Eguchi H, et al. Difference between carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in evaluating the treatment efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results of a dual-center study. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021;5:381-389.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Barnes CA, Aldakkak M, Clarke CN, et al. Value of pretreatment (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with localized pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Front Oncol 2020;10:500.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Barnes CA, Aldakkak M, Clarke CN, et al. Value of pretreatment (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with localized pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Front Oncol 2020;10:500.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Wagner M, Antunes C, Pietrasz D, et al. CT evaluation after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2017;27:3104-3116.PubMedCrossRef Wagner M, Antunes C, Pietrasz D, et al. CT evaluation after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2017;27:3104-3116.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Isaji S, Mizuno S, Windsor JA, et al. International consensus on definition and criteria of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 2017. Pancreatology 2018;18:2-11.PubMedCrossRef Isaji S, Mizuno S, Windsor JA, et al. International consensus on definition and criteria of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 2017. Pancreatology 2018;18:2-11.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Hayasaki A, Isaji S, Kishiwada M, et al. Survival analysis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery according to the international consensus on the 2017 definition of borderline resectable cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2018;10:65.PubMedCrossRef Hayasaki A, Isaji S, Kishiwada M, et al. Survival analysis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery according to the international consensus on the 2017 definition of borderline resectable cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2018;10:65.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Anger F, Doring A, van Dam J, et al. Impact of borderline resectability in pancreatic head cancer on patient survival: biology matters according to the new international consensus criteria. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:2325-2336.PubMedCrossRef Anger F, Doring A, van Dam J, et al. Impact of borderline resectability in pancreatic head cancer on patient survival: biology matters according to the new international consensus criteria. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:2325-2336.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Boone BA, Steve J, Zenati MS, et al. Serum CA 19-9 response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with outcome in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:4351-4358.PubMedCrossRef Boone BA, Steve J, Zenati MS, et al. Serum CA 19-9 response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with outcome in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:4351-4358.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Luo G, Jin K, Deng S, et al. Roles of CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer: Biomarker, predictor and promoter. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2021;1875:188409.PubMedCrossRef Luo G, Jin K, Deng S, et al. Roles of CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer: Biomarker, predictor and promoter. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2021;1875:188409.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical Implications of FDG-PET in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy
Authors
Naoki Ikenaga
Kohei Nakata
Masataka Hayashi
So Nakamura
Toshiya Abe
Noboru Ideno
Masatoshi Murakami
Nao Fujimori
Nobuhiro Fujita
Takuro Isoda
Shingo Baba
Kousei Ishigami
Yoshinao Oda
Masafumi Nakamura
Publication date
18-01-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05591-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2023 Go to the issue