Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2020

01-05-2020 | Gastrectomy | Original Article

The Impact of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy on Survival in the USA

Authors: Brandon S. Hendriksen, Ashton J. Brooks, Christopher S. Hollenbeak, Matthew D. Taylor, Michael F. Reed, David I. Soybel

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive surgical approaches for gastric adenocarcinoma are increasing in prevalence. Although recent studies suggest such approaches are associated with improvements in short-term outcomes, long-term outcomes have not been well studied. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of minimally invasive gastrectomy on long-term survival.

Methods

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients who underwent gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2015. Patient characteristics were stratified by open and minimally invasive approaches and compared using chi-square and t tests. Unadjusted survival functions were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Multivariable modeling of risks factors for survival was analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models. Covariate imbalance was controlled using propensity score matching.

Results

The study included 17,449 patients who underwent gastrectomy. Cox proportional hazard modeling demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery improved survival (hazard ratio = 0.86, P < 0.0001). Predictors of worsened survival included community facility type, comorbidities, tumor size, extent of gastrectomy, clinical T and N staging (P < 0.0060 for all). After propensity score matching, minimally invasive surgery had a significantly improved survival at 5 years compared to an open approach, 51.9% versus 47.7% (P < 0.0001). Survival was not significantly different between propensity score-matched patients who received laparoscopic and robotic approaches (P = 0.2611).

Conclusions

Minimally invasive approaches for gastric carcinoma are associated with improved long-term survival. There was no significant difference in survival when comparing laparoscopic to robotic gastrectomy. The mechanisms that drive these improvements deserve further investigation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-E386.CrossRef Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-E386.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Neugut AI, Hayek M, Howe G. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. Semin Oncol 1996;23:281–291.PubMed Neugut AI, Hayek M, Howe G. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. Semin Oncol 1996;23:281–291.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Anderson WF, Camargo MC, Fraumeni JF, Jr., Correa P, Rosenberg PS, Rabkin CS. Age-specific trends in incidence of noncardia gastric cancer in US adults. JAMA 2010;303:1723–1728.CrossRef Anderson WF, Camargo MC, Fraumeni JF, Jr., Correa P, Rosenberg PS, Rabkin CS. Age-specific trends in incidence of noncardia gastric cancer in US adults. JAMA 2010;303:1723–1728.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:7–30.CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:7–30.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:146–148.PubMed Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:146–148.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1429–1444.CrossRef Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1429–1444.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003;138:777–784.CrossRef Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003;138:777–784.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jiang L, Yang KH, Guan QL, Cao N, Chen Y, Zhao P, Chen YL, Yao L. Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer: an update meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2466–2480.CrossRef Jiang L, Yang KH, Guan QL, Cao N, Chen Y, Zhao P, Chen YL, Yao L. Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer: an update meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2013;27:2466–2480.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Goh PM, Alponat A, Mak K, Kum CK. Early international results of laparoscopic gastrectomies. Surg Endosc 1997;11:650–652.CrossRef Goh PM, Alponat A, Mak K, Kum CK. Early international results of laparoscopic gastrectomies. Surg Endosc 1997;11:650–652.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wei Y, Yu D, Li Y, Fan C, Li G. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis based on high-quality retrospective studies and clinical randomized trials. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2018 Aug 23. Wei Y, Yu D, Li Y, Fan C, Li G. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis based on high-quality retrospective studies and clinical randomized trials. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2018 Aug 23.
12.
go back to reference Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, Nam BH, Kim DH, Choi IJ, Bae JM. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2008;248:721–727.CrossRef Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, Nam BH, Kim DH, Choi IJ, Bae JM. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2008;248:721–727.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Greenleaf EK, Sun SX, Hollenbeak CS, Wong J. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the American experience. Gastric Cancer 2017;20:368–378.CrossRef Greenleaf EK, Sun SX, Hollenbeak CS, Wong J. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the American experience. Gastric Cancer 2017;20:368–378.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Marano A, Choi YY, Hyung WJ, Kim YM, Kim J, Noh SH. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. J Gastric Cancer 2013;13:136–148.CrossRef Marano A, Choi YY, Hyung WJ, Kim YM, Kim J, Noh SH. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. J Gastric Cancer 2013;13:136–148.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Son T, Hyung WJ. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2015;112:271–278.CrossRef Son T, Hyung WJ. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2015;112:271–278.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Obama K, Kim YM, Kang DR, Son T, Kim HI, Noh SH1, Hyung WJ. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 2018;21:285–295. Obama K, Kim YM, Kang DR, Son T, Kim HI, Noh SH1, Hyung WJ. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 2018;21:285–295.
17.
go back to reference Shahian DM, Nordberg P, Meyer GS, Blanchfield BB, Mort EA, Torchiana DF, Normand SL. Contemporary performance of U.S. teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Acad Med 2012;87:701–708.CrossRef Shahian DM, Nordberg P, Meyer GS, Blanchfield BB, Mort EA, Torchiana DF, Normand SL. Contemporary performance of U.S. teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Acad Med 2012;87:701–708.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Burke L, Khullar D, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Frakt A, Jha AK. Do academic medical centers disproportionately benefit the sickest patients? Health Aff (Millwood) 2018;37:864–872.CrossRef Burke L, Khullar D, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Frakt A, Jha AK. Do academic medical centers disproportionately benefit the sickest patients? Health Aff (Millwood) 2018;37:864–872.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Etoh T, Inomata M, Shiraishi N, Kitano S. Minimally invasive approaches for gastric cancer-Japanese experiences. J Surg Oncol 2013;107:282–288.CrossRef Etoh T, Inomata M, Shiraishi N, Kitano S. Minimally invasive approaches for gastric cancer-Japanese experiences. J Surg Oncol 2013;107:282–288.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lianos GD, Hasemaki N, Glantzounis GK, Mitsis M, Rausei S. Assessing safety and feasibility of “pure” laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in the West. Review article. Int J Surg 2018;53:275–278.CrossRef Lianos GD, Hasemaki N, Glantzounis GK, Mitsis M, Rausei S. Assessing safety and feasibility of “pure” laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in the West. Review article. Int J Surg 2018;53:275–278.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Greenleaf EK, Hollenbeak CS, Wong J. Trends in the use and impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on perioperative outcomes for resected gastric cancer: Evidence from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Database. Surgery. 2016;159(4):1099–1112.CrossRef Greenleaf EK, Hollenbeak CS, Wong J. Trends in the use and impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on perioperative outcomes for resected gastric cancer: Evidence from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Database. Surgery. 2016;159(4):1099–1112.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Oehrlein EM, Graff JS, Perfetto EM, Mullins CD, Dubois RW, Anyanwu C, Onukwugha E. Peer-reviewed journal editors’ views on real-world evidence. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2018;34:111–119.CrossRef Oehrlein EM, Graff JS, Perfetto EM, Mullins CD, Dubois RW, Anyanwu C, Onukwugha E. Peer-reviewed journal editors’ views on real-world evidence. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2018;34:111–119.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zou ZH, Zhao LY, Mou TY, Hu YF, Yu J, Liu H, Chen H, Wu JM, An SL, Li GX. Laparoscopic vs open D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:16750–16764.CrossRef Zou ZH, Zhao LY, Mou TY, Hu YF, Yu J, Liu H, Chen H, Wu JM, An SL, Li GX. Laparoscopic vs open D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:16750–16764.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cassidy MR, Gholami S, Strong VE. Minimally invasive surgery: the emerging role in gastric cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2017;26:193–212.CrossRef Cassidy MR, Gholami S, Strong VE. Minimally invasive surgery: the emerging role in gastric cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2017;26:193–212.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shu ZB, Cao HP, Li YC, Sun LB. Influences of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy on serum interleukin-6 levels in patients with gastric cancer among Asian populations: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:52.CrossRef Shu ZB, Cao HP, Li YC, Sun LB. Influences of laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy on serum interleukin-6 levels in patients with gastric cancer among Asian populations: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:52.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Okholm C, Goetze JP, Svendsen LB, Achiam MP. Inflammatory response in laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastric cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(9):1027–1034.CrossRef Okholm C, Goetze JP, Svendsen LB, Achiam MP. Inflammatory response in laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastric cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(9):1027–1034.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Impact of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy on Survival in the USA
Authors
Brandon S. Hendriksen
Ashton J. Brooks
Christopher S. Hollenbeak
Matthew D. Taylor
Michael F. Reed
David I. Soybel
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04263-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2020 Go to the issue