Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Article

Gastric Ischemic Conditioning Prior to Esophagectomy Is Associated with Decreased Stricture Rate and Overall Anastomotic Complications

Authors: Steve R. Siegal, Abhishek D. Parmar, Kelly R. Haisley, Brandon H. Tieu, Paul H. Schipper, John G. Hunter, James P. Dolan

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Gastric ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy can increase neovascularization of the new conduit. Prior studies of ischemic conditioning have only investigated reductions in anastomotic leaks. Our aim was to analyze the association between gastric conditioning and all anastomotic outcomes as well as overall morbidity in our cohort of esophagectomy patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing esophagectomy from 2010 to 2015 in a National Cancer Institute designated center. Ischemic conditioning (IC) was performed on morbidly obese patients, those with cardiovascular disease or uncontrolled diabetes, and those requiring feeding jejunostomy and active tobacco users. IC consisted of transection of the short gastric vessels and ligation of the left gastric vessels. Primary outcomes consisted of all postoperative anastomotic complications. Secondary outcomes were overall morbidity.

Results

Two-hundred and seven esophagectomies were performed with an average follow-up of 19 months. Thirty-eight patients (18.4%) underwent conditioning (IC). This group was similar to patients not conditioned (NIC) in age, preoperative pathology, and surgical approach. Five patients in the ischemic conditioning group (13.2%) and 57 patients (33.7%) in the NIC experienced anastomotic complications (p = 0.011). Ischemic conditioning significantly reduced the postoperative stricture rate fourfold (5.3 vs. 20.7% p = 0.02). IC patients experienced significantly fewer complications overall (36.8 vs. 56.2% p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Gastric ischemic conditioning is associated with fewer overall anastomotic complications, fewer strictures, and less morbidity. Randomized studies may determine optimal selection criteria to determine whom best benefits from ischemic conditioning.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Engel, L.S., et al., Population attributable risks of esophageal and gastric cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2003. 95(18): p. 1404–13.CrossRefPubMed Engel, L.S., et al., Population attributable risks of esophageal and gastric cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2003. 95(18): p. 1404–13.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Njei, B., T.R. McCarty, and J.W. Birk, Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: A SEER database analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016. 31(6): p. 1141–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Njei, B., T.R. McCarty, and J.W. Birk, Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: A SEER database analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016. 31(6): p. 1141–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Bailey, S.H., et al., Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003. 75(1): p. 217–22; discussion 222.CrossRefPubMed Bailey, S.H., et al., Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003. 75(1): p. 217–22; discussion 222.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Markar, S.R., et al., Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012. 16(5): p. 1055–63.CrossRefPubMed Markar, S.R., et al., Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012. 16(5): p. 1055–63.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Seely, A.J., et al., Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010. 90(3): p. 936–42; discussion 942.CrossRefPubMed Seely, A.J., et al., Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010. 90(3): p. 936–42; discussion 942.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Akiyama, S., et al., Preoperative embolization therapy for esophageal operation. J Surg Oncol, 1998. 69(4): p. 219–23.CrossRefPubMed Akiyama, S., et al., Preoperative embolization therapy for esophageal operation. J Surg Oncol, 1998. 69(4): p. 219–23.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Law, S., et al., Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg, 1997. 226(2): p. 169–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Law, S., et al., Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg, 1997. 226(2): p. 169–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Pham, T.H., et al., Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach increases neovascularization of the gastric conduit in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. J Surg Oncol, 2017. 116(3): p. 391–397.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pham, T.H., et al., Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach increases neovascularization of the gastric conduit in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. J Surg Oncol, 2017. 116(3): p. 391–397.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Kechagias, A., et al., Ischemic Conditioning of the Stomach in the Prevention of Esophagogastric Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016. 101(4): p. 1614–23.CrossRefPubMed Kechagias, A., et al., Ischemic Conditioning of the Stomach in the Prevention of Esophagogastric Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016. 101(4): p. 1614–23.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Markar, S.R., et al., Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013. 20(13): p. 4274–81.CrossRefPubMed Markar, S.R., et al., Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013. 20(13): p. 4274–81.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ney, A. and R. Kumar, Does preoperative ischaemic conditioning with gastric vessel ligation reduce anastomotic leaks in oesophagectomy? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2014. 19(1): p. 121–4.CrossRefPubMed Ney, A. and R. Kumar, Does preoperative ischaemic conditioning with gastric vessel ligation reduce anastomotic leaks in oesophagectomy? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2014. 19(1): p. 121–4.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Charlson, M.E., et al., A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis, 1987. 40(5): p. 373–83.CrossRefPubMed Charlson, M.E., et al., A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis, 1987. 40(5): p. 373–83.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dhungel, B., et al., Patient and peri-operative predictors of morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), 2005-2008. J Gastrointest Surg, 2010. 14(10): p. 1492–501.CrossRefPubMed Dhungel, B., et al., Patient and peri-operative predictors of morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), 2005-2008. J Gastrointest Surg, 2010. 14(10): p. 1492–501.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bludau, M., et al., Ischemic conditioning of the gastric conduit prior to esophagectomy improves mucosal oxygen saturation. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010. 90(4): p. 1121–6.CrossRefPubMed Bludau, M., et al., Ischemic conditioning of the gastric conduit prior to esophagectomy improves mucosal oxygen saturation. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010. 90(4): p. 1121–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Perry, K.A., et al., Gastric ischemic conditioning increases neovascularization and reduces inflammation and fibrosis during gastroesophageal anastomotic healing. Surg Endosc, 2013. 27(3): p. 753–60.CrossRefPubMed Perry, K.A., et al., Gastric ischemic conditioning increases neovascularization and reduces inflammation and fibrosis during gastroesophageal anastomotic healing. Surg Endosc, 2013. 27(3): p. 753–60.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Reavis, K.M., et al., Utilization of the delay phenomenon improves blood flow and reduces collagen deposition in esophagogastric anastomoses. Ann Surg, 2005. 241(5): p. 736–45; discussion 745–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reavis, K.M., et al., Utilization of the delay phenomenon improves blood flow and reduces collagen deposition in esophagogastric anastomoses. Ann Surg, 2005. 241(5): p. 736–45; discussion 745–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Nguyen, N.T., et al., Minimally invasive esophagectomy with and without gastric ischemic conditioning. Surg Endosc, 2012. 26(6): p. 1637–41.CrossRefPubMed Nguyen, N.T., et al., Minimally invasive esophagectomy with and without gastric ischemic conditioning. Surg Endosc, 2012. 26(6): p. 1637–41.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Gastric Ischemic Conditioning Prior to Esophagectomy Is Associated with Decreased Stricture Rate and Overall Anastomotic Complications
Authors
Steve R. Siegal
Abhishek D. Parmar
Kelly R. Haisley
Brandon H. Tieu
Paul H. Schipper
John G. Hunter
James P. Dolan
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3817-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2018 Go to the issue