Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2013

01-03-2013

Gastric ischemic conditioning increases neovascularization and reduces inflammation and fibrosis during gastroesophageal anastomotic healing

Authors: Kyle A. Perry, Ambar Banarjee, James Liu, Nilay Shah, Mark R. Wendling, W. Scott Melvin

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The incidence of anastomotic leak and stricture after esophagectomy remains high. Gastric devascularization followed by delayed esophageal resection has been proposed to minimize these complications. We investigated the effect of ischemic conditioning duration on anastomotic wound healing in an animal model of esophagogastrectomy.

Methods

North American opossums were randomized to four study groups. Group A underwent immediate resection and gastroesophageal anastomosis. Groups B, C, and D were treated with delayed resection and anastomosis after a gastric ischemic conditioning period of 7, 30, and 90 days, respectively. Gastric conditioning was performed by ligating the left, right, and short gastric vessels. An intraabdominal esophagogastric resection and anastomosis was performed, followed by euthanasia 10 days later. Outcome variables included anastomotic bursting pressure, microvessel concentration, tissue inflammation, and collagen deposition.

Results

Twenty-four opossums were randomized to groups A (n = 7), B (n = 8), C (n = 5), and D (n = 4). Subclinical anastomotic leak was discovered at necropsy in 5 animals: 3 in group A, and 1 each in groups B and C (p = 0.295). The anastomotic bursting pressure did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.545). A 7 day ischemic conditioning time did not produce increased neovascularity (p = 0.900), but animals with a 30 day conditioning time showed significantly increased microvessel counts compared to unconditioned animals (p = 0.016). The degree of inflammation at the healing anastomosis decreased significantly as the ischemic conditioning period increased (p = 0.003). Increasing delay interval was also associated with increased muscularis propria preservation (p = 0.001) and decreased collagen deposition at the healing anastomosis (p = 0.020).

Conclusions

Animals treated with 30 days of gastric ischemic conditioning showed significantly increased neovascularity and muscularis propria preservation and decreased inflammation and collagen deposition at the healing anastomosis. These data suggest that an ischemic conditioning period longer than 7 days is required to achieve the desired effect on wound healing.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gopal DV, Jobe BA (2002) Screening for Barrett’s esophagus may not reduce morbidity and mortality due to esophageal adenocarcinoma—commentary. Evid Based Oncol 3:144–145CrossRef Gopal DV, Jobe BA (2002) Screening for Barrett’s esophagus may not reduce morbidity and mortality due to esophageal adenocarcinoma—commentary. Evid Based Oncol 3:144–145CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Spechler SJ (2001) Screening and surveillance for complications related to gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med 111:130S–136SPubMedCrossRef Spechler SJ (2001) Screening and surveillance for complications related to gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med 111:130S–136SPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Connors RC, Reuben BC, Neumayer LA, Bull DA (2007) Comparing outcomes after transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy: a 5-year prospective cohort of 17,395 patients. J Am Coll Surg 205:735–740PubMedCrossRef Connors RC, Reuben BC, Neumayer LA, Bull DA (2007) Comparing outcomes after transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy: a 5-year prospective cohort of 17,395 patients. J Am Coll Surg 205:735–740PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lagarde SM, Reitsma JB, de Castro SM, Ten Kate FJ, Busch OR, van Lanschot J (2007) Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction. Br J Surg 94:1361–1368PubMedCrossRef Lagarde SM, Reitsma JB, de Castro SM, Ten Kate FJ, Busch OR, van Lanschot J (2007) Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction. Br J Surg 94:1361–1368PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rodgers M, Jobe BA, O’Rourke RW, Sheppard B, Diggs B, Hunter JG (2007) Case volume as a predictor of inpatient mortality after esophagectomy. Arch Surg 142:829–839PubMedCrossRef Rodgers M, Jobe BA, O’Rourke RW, Sheppard B, Diggs B, Hunter JG (2007) Case volume as a predictor of inpatient mortality after esophagectomy. Arch Surg 142:829–839PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lu M, Ye W, Johansson J, Lagergren J (2006) Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden. Ann Surg 243:204–211PubMedCrossRef Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lu M, Ye W, Johansson J, Lagergren J (2006) Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden. Ann Surg 243:204–211PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gondek K, Sagnier PP, Gilchrist K, Woolley JM (2007) Current status of patient-reported outcomes in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials and product labels. J Clin Oncol 25:5087–5093PubMedCrossRef Gondek K, Sagnier PP, Gilchrist K, Woolley JM (2007) Current status of patient-reported outcomes in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials and product labels. J Clin Oncol 25:5087–5093PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Viklund P, Lindbald M, Lagergren J (2005) Influence of surgery-related factors on quality of life after esophageal or cardia cancer resection. World J Surg 29:841–848PubMedCrossRef Viklund P, Lindbald M, Lagergren J (2005) Influence of surgery-related factors on quality of life after esophageal or cardia cancer resection. World J Surg 29:841–848PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (1999) Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 230:392–403PubMedCrossRef Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (1999) Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 230:392–403PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, Shinozawa Y, Kitajima M (2000) Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous cell esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg 232:225–232PubMedCrossRef Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, Shinozawa Y, Kitajima M (2000) Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous cell esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg 232:225–232PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Feith M, Bruecher BL, Bartels H, Fink U (2001) Histologic tumor type is an independent prognostic parameter in esophageal cancer: lessons from more than 1,000 consecutive resections at a single center in the Western world. Ann Surg 234:360–369PubMedCrossRef Siewert JR, Stein HJ, Feith M, Bruecher BL, Bartels H, Fink U (2001) Histologic tumor type is an independent prognostic parameter in esophageal cancer: lessons from more than 1,000 consecutive resections at a single center in the Western world. Ann Surg 234:360–369PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hölscher AH, Schröder W, Bollschweiler E, Beckurts KT, Schneider PM (2003) How safe is high intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy? Chirurg 74:726–733PubMedCrossRef Hölscher AH, Schröder W, Bollschweiler E, Beckurts KT, Schneider PM (2003) How safe is high intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy? Chirurg 74:726–733PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference McCulloch P, Ward J, Tekkis PP (2003) Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ 327:1192–1197PubMedCrossRef McCulloch P, Ward J, Tekkis PP (2003) Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ 327:1192–1197PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rentz J, Bull D, Harpole D, Bailey S, Neumayer L, Pappas T, Krasnicka B, Henderson W, Daley J, Khuri S (2003) Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:1114–1120PubMedCrossRef Rentz J, Bull D, Harpole D, Bailey S, Neumayer L, Pappas T, Krasnicka B, Henderson W, Daley J, Khuri S (2003) Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:1114–1120PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Valverde A, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Elhadad A (1996) Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. Surgery 120:476–483PubMedCrossRef Valverde A, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Elhadad A (1996) Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. Surgery 120:476–483PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, Peters JH, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198:536–541PubMedCrossRef Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, Peters JH, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198:536–541PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Liebermann-Meffert DM, Meier R, Siewert JR (1992) Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 54:1110–1115PubMedCrossRef Liebermann-Meffert DM, Meier R, Siewert JR (1992) Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 54:1110–1115PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pierie JP, De Graaf PW, Poen H, Van der Tweel I, Obertop H (1994) Impaired healing of cervical oesophagogastrostomies can be predicted by estimation of gastric serosal blood perfusion by laser Doppler flowmetry. Eur J Surg 160:599–603PubMed Pierie JP, De Graaf PW, Poen H, Van der Tweel I, Obertop H (1994) Impaired healing of cervical oesophagogastrostomies can be predicted by estimation of gastric serosal blood perfusion by laser Doppler flowmetry. Eur J Surg 160:599–603PubMed
20.
go back to reference Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640PubMedCrossRef Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Boyle NH, Pearce A, Hunter D, Owen WJ, Mason RC (1998) Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry and intraluminal recirculating gas tonometry in the assessment of gastric and jejunal perfusion during oesophageal resection. Br J Surg 85:1407–1411PubMedCrossRef Boyle NH, Pearce A, Hunter D, Owen WJ, Mason RC (1998) Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry and intraluminal recirculating gas tonometry in the assessment of gastric and jejunal perfusion during oesophageal resection. Br J Surg 85:1407–1411PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schröder W, Stippel D, Beckurts KT, Lacher M, Gutschow C, Hölscher AH (2001) Intraoperative changes of mucosal pCO2 during gastric tube formation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386:324–327PubMedCrossRef Schröder W, Stippel D, Beckurts KT, Lacher M, Gutschow C, Hölscher AH (2001) Intraoperative changes of mucosal pCO2 during gastric tube formation. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386:324–327PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schröder W, Beckurts KT, Stähler D, Stützer H, Fischer JH, Hölscher AH (2002) Microcirculatory changes associated with gastric tube formation in the pig. Eur Surg Res 34:411–417PubMedCrossRef Schröder W, Beckurts KT, Stähler D, Stützer H, Fischer JH, Hölscher AH (2002) Microcirculatory changes associated with gastric tube formation in the pig. Eur Surg Res 34:411–417PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Urschel JD (1998) Esophagogastric anastomotic leaks: the importance of gastric ischemia and therapeutic applications of gastric conditioning. J Invest Surg 11:245–250PubMedCrossRef Urschel JD (1998) Esophagogastric anastomotic leaks: the importance of gastric ischemia and therapeutic applications of gastric conditioning. J Invest Surg 11:245–250PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Urschel JD, Antkowiak JG, Delacure MD, Takita H (1997) Ischemic conditioning (delay phenomenon) improves esophagogastric anastomotic wound healing in the rat. J Surg Oncol 66:254–256PubMedCrossRef Urschel JD, Antkowiak JG, Delacure MD, Takita H (1997) Ischemic conditioning (delay phenomenon) improves esophagogastric anastomotic wound healing in the rat. J Surg Oncol 66:254–256PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Reavis KM, Chang EY, Hunter JG, Jobe BA (2005) Utilization of the delay phenomenon improves blood flow and reduces collagen deposition in esophagogastric anastomoses. Ann Surg 241:736–745PubMedCrossRef Reavis KM, Chang EY, Hunter JG, Jobe BA (2005) Utilization of the delay phenomenon improves blood flow and reduces collagen deposition in esophagogastric anastomoses. Ann Surg 241:736–745PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hölscher AH, Schneider PM, Gutschow C, Schröder W (2007) Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Ann Surg 245:241–246PubMedCrossRef Hölscher AH, Schneider PM, Gutschow C, Schröder W (2007) Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Ann Surg 245:241–246PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Oezcelik A, Banki F, DeMeester SR, Leers JM, Ayazi S, Abate E, Hagen JA, Lipham JC, DeMeester TR (2009) Delayed esophagogastrostomy: a safe strategy for management of patients with ischemic gastric conduit at time of esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 208:1030–1034PubMedCrossRef Oezcelik A, Banki F, DeMeester SR, Leers JM, Ayazi S, Abate E, Hagen JA, Lipham JC, DeMeester TR (2009) Delayed esophagogastrostomy: a safe strategy for management of patients with ischemic gastric conduit at time of esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 208:1030–1034PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Forse RA, MacDonald PH, Mercer CD (1999) Anastomotic and regional blood flow following esophagogastrectomy in an opossum model. J Invest Surg 12:45–52PubMedCrossRef Forse RA, MacDonald PH, Mercer CD (1999) Anastomotic and regional blood flow following esophagogastrectomy in an opossum model. J Invest Surg 12:45–52PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F, Bevilacqua P, Allred EN, Moore DH, Meli S, Gasparini G (1992) Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1875–1887PubMedCrossRef Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F, Bevilacqua P, Allred EN, Moore DH, Meli S, Gasparini G (1992) Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1875–1887PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB, Colpaert C, Marson LP, Gion M, Beliën JA, de Waal RM, Van Marck E, Magnani E, Weidner N, Harris AL, Dirix LY (2002) Second international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation of angiogenesis quantification in solid human tumours. Eur J Cancer 38:1564–1579PubMedCrossRef Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB, Colpaert C, Marson LP, Gion M, Beliën JA, de Waal RM, Van Marck E, Magnani E, Weidner N, Harris AL, Dirix LY (2002) Second international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation of angiogenesis quantification in solid human tumours. Eur J Cancer 38:1564–1579PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hegde SS, Seidel SA, Ladipo JK, Bradshaw LA, Halter S, Richards WO (1998) Effects of mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion on small bowel electrical activity. J Surg Res 74:86–95PubMedCrossRef Hegde SS, Seidel SA, Ladipo JK, Bradshaw LA, Halter S, Richards WO (1998) Effects of mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion on small bowel electrical activity. J Surg Res 74:86–95PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lineaweaver WC, Lei MP, Mustain W, Oswald TM, Cui D, Zhang F (2004) Vascular endothelium growth factor, surgical delay, and skin flap survival. Ann Surg 239:866–873PubMedCrossRef Lineaweaver WC, Lei MP, Mustain W, Oswald TM, Cui D, Zhang F (2004) Vascular endothelium growth factor, surgical delay, and skin flap survival. Ann Surg 239:866–873PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Enestvedt CK, Hosack L, Winn SR, Diggs BS, Uchida B, O’Rourke RW, Jobe BA (2008) VEGF gene therapy augments localized angiogenesis and promotes anastomotic wound healing: a pilot study in a clinically relevant animal model. J Gastrointest Sur 12:1762–1770CrossRef Enestvedt CK, Hosack L, Winn SR, Diggs BS, Uchida B, O’Rourke RW, Jobe BA (2008) VEGF gene therapy augments localized angiogenesis and promotes anastomotic wound healing: a pilot study in a clinically relevant animal model. J Gastrointest Sur 12:1762–1770CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Enestvedt CK, Hosack L, Hoppo T, Perry KA, O’Rourke RW, Winn SR, Hunter JG, Jobe BA (2012) Recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor(165) gene therapy improves anastomotic healing in an animal model of ischemic esophagogastrostomy. Dis Esophagus 25(5):456–464PubMedCrossRef Enestvedt CK, Hosack L, Hoppo T, Perry KA, O’Rourke RW, Winn SR, Hunter JG, Jobe BA (2012) Recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor(165) gene therapy improves anastomotic healing in an animal model of ischemic esophagogastrostomy. Dis Esophagus 25(5):456–464PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Akiyama S, Ito S, Sekiguchi H, Fujiwara M, Sakamoto J, Kondo K, Kasai Y, Ito K, Takagi H (1996) Preoperative embolization of gastric arteries for esophageal cancer. Surgery 120:542–546PubMedCrossRef Akiyama S, Ito S, Sekiguchi H, Fujiwara M, Sakamoto J, Kondo K, Kasai Y, Ito K, Takagi H (1996) Preoperative embolization of gastric arteries for esophageal cancer. Surgery 120:542–546PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Gastric ischemic conditioning increases neovascularization and reduces inflammation and fibrosis during gastroesophageal anastomotic healing
Authors
Kyle A. Perry
Ambar Banarjee
James Liu
Nilay Shah
Mark R. Wendling
W. Scott Melvin
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2535-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2013 Go to the issue