Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2018

Open Access 01-04-2018 | Original Article

Prognostic Significance of Serum Inflammatory Markers in Gastric Cancer

Authors: Arfon G. M. T. Powell, Debora Parkinson, Neil Patel, David Chan, Adam Christian, Wyn G. Lewis

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the relative prognostic value of biomarkers to measure the systemic inflammatory response (SIR) and improve prognostic modeling in a cohort of patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma. The hypothesis was that a single SIR biomarker would be associated with the most prognostic value.

Methods

Consecutive 331 patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer between 2004 and 2016 within a regional UK cancer network were identified. Serum measurements of hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, albumin, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, and differential white cell counts were obtained before surgery, and correlated with histopathological factors (pTNM stage, differentiation, and vascular invasion) and survival. Primary outcome measures were disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Consecutive 331 patients were identified and 291 underwent potentially curative gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. On univariable DFS analysis, female gender (p = 0.027), proximal location (p = 0.018), pT stage (p < 0.001), pN stage (p < 0.001), pTNM stage (p < 0.001), vascular invasion (p < 0.001), poor differentiation (p = 0.001), lymph node ratio (p < 0.001), R1 status (p < 0.001), platelet count (p = 0.038), and mGPS (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with poor survival. The mGPS was associated with advanced pT stage (p = 0.001), pTNM stage (p = 0.013), and poor differentiation (p = 0.030). On multivariable DFS analysis, mGPS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35–4.65, p = 0.011] was the only inflammatory marker to retain independent significance. Multivariable OS analysis revealed similar findings; mGPS (HR 2.75, (95% CI 1.65–4.59), p < 0.001).

Conclusion

mGPS is an important and only SIR-related prognostic biomarker independently associated with both DFS and OS in gastric cancer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ludwig JA, Weinstein JN. Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005; 5:845–856.CrossRefPubMed Ludwig JA, Weinstein JN. Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005; 5:845–856.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010; 127:2893–2917.CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010; 127:2893–2917.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis. 2009; 30(7):1073–1081.CrossRefPubMed Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis. 2009; 30(7):1073–1081.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wang SC, Chou JF, Strong VE, Brennan MF, Capanu M, Coit DG. Pretreatment Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Independently Predicts Disease-specific Survival in Resectable Gastroesophageal Junction and Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2016; 263:292–297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang SC, Chou JF, Strong VE, Brennan MF, Capanu M, Coit DG. Pretreatment Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Independently Predicts Disease-specific Survival in Resectable Gastroesophageal Junction and Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2016; 263:292–297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Smith RA, Bosonnet L, Raraty M, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP, Campbell F, Ghaneh P. Preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio is an independent significant prognostic marker in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2009; 197:466–472.CrossRefPubMed Smith RA, Bosonnet L, Raraty M, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP, Campbell F, Ghaneh P. Preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio is an independent significant prognostic marker in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2009; 197:466–472.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Watt DG, Proctor MJ, Park JH, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. The Neutrophil-Platelet Score (NPS) Predicts Survival in Primary Operable Colorectal Cancer and a Variety of Common Cancers. Grivennikov S, ed. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10:e0142159.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Watt DG, Proctor MJ, Park JH, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. The Neutrophil-Platelet Score (NPS) Predicts Survival in Primary Operable Colorectal Cancer and a Variety of Common Cancers. Grivennikov S, ed. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10:e0142159.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Angerson WJ, Dunlop DJ. Comparison of an inflammation based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG) in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for inoperable non small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004; 90:1704–1706CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Angerson WJ, Dunlop DJ. Comparison of an inflammation based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG) in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for inoperable non small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004; 90:1704–1706CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Crumley ABC, McMillan DC, McKernan M, McDonald AC, Stuart RC. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with inoperable gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006; 94:637–641.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Crumley ABC, McMillan DC, McKernan M, McDonald AC, Stuart RC. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score in patients with inoperable gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006; 94:637–641.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Dutta S, Crumley AB, Fullarton GM, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Comparison of the prognostic value of tumour and patient related factors in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2012; 204:294–299.CrossRefPubMed Dutta S, Crumley AB, Fullarton GM, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Comparison of the prognostic value of tumour and patient related factors in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2012; 204:294–299.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ, Smith DB, Langley RE, Verma M, Weeden S, Chua YJ, MAGIC Trial Participants. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:11–20.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, Scarffe JH, Lofts FJ, Falk SJ, Iveson TJ, Smith DB, Langley RE, Verma M, Weeden S, Chua YJ, MAGIC Trial Participants. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:11–20.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Roxburgh CS, Wallace AM, Guthrie GK, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Comparison of the prognostic value of tumour- and patient-related factors in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colon cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2010; 12:987–994.CrossRefPubMed Roxburgh CS, Wallace AM, Guthrie GK, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Comparison of the prognostic value of tumour- and patient-related factors in patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colon cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2010; 12:987–994.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference McMillan DC, Crozier JE, Canna K, Angerson WJ, McArdle CS. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007; 22: 81–86.CrossRef McMillan DC, Crozier JE, Canna K, Angerson WJ, McArdle CS. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007; 22: 81–86.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, Craven J, Bancewicz J, Joypaul V, Cook P. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. Lancet. 1996; 347:995–9CrossRefPubMed Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, Craven J, Bancewicz J, Joypaul V, Cook P. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. Lancet. 1996; 347:995–9CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Al Murri AM, Bartlett JM, Canney PA, Doughty JC, Wilson C, McMillan DC. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006; 94:227–230.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Al Murri AM, Bartlett JM, Canney PA, Doughty JC, Wilson C, McMillan DC. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006; 94:227–230.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Shafique K, Proctor MJ, McMillan DC, Leung H, Smith K, Sloan B, Morrison DS. The modified Glasgow prognostic score in prostate cancer: results from a retrospective clinical series of 744 patients. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:292.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shafique K, Proctor MJ, McMillan DC, Leung H, Smith K, Sloan B, Morrison DS. The modified Glasgow prognostic score in prostate cancer: results from a retrospective clinical series of 744 patients. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:292.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Jiang X, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Kumagai K, Kubota T, Aikou S, Sano T, Yamaguchi T. Prognostic importance of the inflammation-based Glasgow prognostic score in patients with gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107:275–279.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jiang X, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Kumagai K, Kubota T, Aikou S, Sano T, Yamaguchi T. Prognostic importance of the inflammation-based Glasgow prognostic score in patients with gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107:275–279.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Park JH, Watt DG, Roxburgh CS, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Colorectal Cancer, Systemic Inflammation, and Outcome: Staging the Tumor and Staging the Host. Ann Surg. 2016; 263:326–336CrossRefPubMed Park JH, Watt DG, Roxburgh CS, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Colorectal Cancer, Systemic Inflammation, and Outcome: Staging the Tumor and Staging the Host. Ann Surg. 2016; 263:326–336CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Carruthers R, Tho LM, Brown J, Kakumanu S, McCartney E, McDonald AC. Systemic inflammatory response is a predictor of outcome in patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14:e701–707.CrossRefPubMed Carruthers R, Tho LM, Brown J, Kakumanu S, McCartney E, McDonald AC. Systemic inflammatory response is a predictor of outcome in patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14:e701–707.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Kubota K. Influence of inflammation-based prognostic score on mortality of patients undergoing chemotherapy for far advanced or recurrent unresectable colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009; 250:268–272.CrossRefPubMed Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Kubota K. Influence of inflammation-based prognostic score on mortality of patients undergoing chemotherapy for far advanced or recurrent unresectable colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009; 250:268–272.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Dreyer SB, Powell AG, McSorley ST, Waterston A, Going JJ, Edwards J, McMillan DC, Horgan PG. The Pretreatment Systemic Inflammatory Response is an Important Determinant of Poor Pathologic Response for Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5684-3. Dreyer SB, Powell AG, McSorley ST, Waterston A, Going JJ, Edwards J, McMillan DC, Horgan PG. The Pretreatment Systemic Inflammatory Response is an Important Determinant of Poor Pathologic Response for Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-016-5684-3.
22.
go back to reference Hwang JE, Kim HN, Kim DE, Choi HJ, Jung SH, Shim HJ, Bae WK, Hwang EC, Cho SH, Chung IJ. Prognostic significance of a systemic inflammatory response in patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy for recurred or metastatic gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hwang JE, Kim HN, Kim DE, Choi HJ, Jung SH, Shim HJ, Bae WK, Hwang EC, Cho SH, Chung IJ. Prognostic significance of a systemic inflammatory response in patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy for recurred or metastatic gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:489.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Chan DS, Reid TD, White C, Willicombe A, Blackshaw G, Clark GW, Havard TJ, Escofet X, Crosby TD, Roberts SA, Lewis WG. Influence of a regional centralized upper gastrointestinal cancer service model on patient safety, quality of care and survival. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013; 25:719–725.CrossRef Chan DS, Reid TD, White C, Willicombe A, Blackshaw G, Clark GW, Havard TJ, Escofet X, Crosby TD, Roberts SA, Lewis WG. Influence of a regional centralized upper gastrointestinal cancer service model on patient safety, quality of care and survival. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013; 25:719–725.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prognostic Significance of Serum Inflammatory Markers in Gastric Cancer
Authors
Arfon G. M. T. Powell
Debora Parkinson
Neil Patel
David Chan
Adam Christian
Wyn G. Lewis
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3597-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2018 Go to the issue