Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Article

Predictive Value of CEA for Survival in Stage I Rectal Cancer: a Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Authors: Ignazio Tarantino, Rene Warschkow, Bruno M. Schmied, Ulrich Güller, Markus Mieth, Thomas Cerny, Markus W. Büchler, Alexis Ulrich

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to assess whether preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level is an independent predictor of overall- and cancer-specific survival in stage I rectal cancer.

Methods

Stage I rectal cancer patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2011. The impact of an elevated preoperative CEA level (C1-stage) compared with a normal CEA level (C0-stage) on overall and cancer-specific survival was assessed using risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models and propensity score methods.

Results

Overall, 1932 stage I rectal cancer patients were included, of which 328 (17 %) patients had C1-stage. The 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival for patients with C0-stage were 85.7 % (95 % CI 83.2–88.2 %) and 94.7 % (95 % CI 93.1–96.3 %), versus 76.8 % (95 % CI 70.9–83.1 %) and 88.1 % (95 % CI 83.3–93.2 %) for patients with C1-stage (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). The negative impact of C1-stage on overall and cancer-specific survival was confirmed by risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.57, 95 % CI = 1.15–2.16, P = 0.007 and 2.04, 95 % CI = 1.25–3.33, P = 0.006), and after propensity score matching (overall survival [OS]: HR = 1.46, 95 % CI = 1.02–2.08, P = 0.044 and cancer-specific survival [CSS]: HR = 3.28, 95 % CI = 1.78–6.03, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

This is the first population-based investigation of a large cohort of exclusively stage I rectal cancer patients providing compelling evidence that elevated preoperative CEA level is a strong predictor of worse overall and cancer-specific survival.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):74–108.PubMedCrossRef Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):74–108.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Blumberg D, Paty PB, Picon AI, Guillem JG, Klimstra DS, Minsky BD et al. Stage I rectal cancer: identification of high-risk patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186(5):574–9.PubMedCrossRef Blumberg D, Paty PB, Picon AI, Guillem JG, Klimstra DS, Minsky BD et al. Stage I rectal cancer: identification of high-risk patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186(5):574–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gunderson LL, Sargent DJ, Tepper JE, Wolmark N, O’Connell MJ, Begovic M et al. Impact of T and N stage and treatment on survival and relapse in adjuvant rectal cancer: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(10):1785–96. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.08.173.PubMedCrossRef Gunderson LL, Sargent DJ, Tepper JE, Wolmark N, O’Connell MJ, Begovic M et al. Impact of T and N stage and treatment on survival and relapse in adjuvant rectal cancer: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(10):1785–96. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2004.​08.​173.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wolmark N, Fisher B, Wieand HS, Henry RS, Lerner H, Legault-Poisson S et al. The prognostic significance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels in colorectal cancer. Results from NSABP (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project) clinical trials. Ann Surg. 1984;199(4):375–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wolmark N, Fisher B, Wieand HS, Henry RS, Lerner H, Legault-Poisson S et al. The prognostic significance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels in colorectal cancer. Results from NSABP (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project) clinical trials. Ann Surg. 1984;199(4):375–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chu DZ, Erickson CA, Russell MP, Thompson C, Lang NP, Broadwater RJ et al. Prognostic significance of carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal carcinoma. Serum levels before and after resection and before recurrence. Arch Surg. 1991;126(3):314–6.PubMedCrossRef Chu DZ, Erickson CA, Russell MP, Thompson C, Lang NP, Broadwater RJ et al. Prognostic significance of carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal carcinoma. Serum levels before and after resection and before recurrence. Arch Surg. 1991;126(3):314–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Harrison LE, Guillem JG, Paty P, Cohen AM. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen predicts outcomes in node-negative colon cancer patients: a multivariate analysis of 572 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(1):55–9.PubMedCrossRef Harrison LE, Guillem JG, Paty P, Cohen AM. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen predicts outcomes in node-negative colon cancer patients: a multivariate analysis of 572 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(1):55–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lucha PA, Jr., Rosen L, Olenwine JA, Reed JF, 3rd, Riether RD, Stasik JJ, Jr. et al. Value of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in curative surgery for recurrent colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(2):145–9.PubMedCrossRef Lucha PA, Jr., Rosen L, Olenwine JA, Reed JF, 3rd, Riether RD, Stasik JJ, Jr. et al. Value of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in curative surgery for recurrent colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(2):145–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Moertel CG, O’Fallon JR, Go VL, O’Connell MJ, Thynne GS. The preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen test in the diagnosis, staging, and prognosis of colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1986;58(3):603–10.PubMedCrossRef Moertel CG, O’Fallon JR, Go VL, O’Connell MJ, Thynne GS. The preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen test in the diagnosis, staging, and prognosis of colorectal cancer. Cancer. 1986;58(3):603–10.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Park YJ, Park KJ, Park JG, Lee KU, Choe KJ, Kim JP. Prognostic factors in 2230 Korean colorectal cancer patients: analysis of consecutively operated cases. World J Surg. 1999;23(7):721–6.PubMedCrossRef Park YJ, Park KJ, Park JG, Lee KU, Choe KJ, Kim JP. Prognostic factors in 2230 Korean colorectal cancer patients: analysis of consecutively operated cases. World J Surg. 1999;23(7):721–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Thirunavukarasu P, Sukumar S, Sathaiah M, Mahan M, Pragatheeshwar KD, Pingpank JF et al. C-stage in colon cancer: implications of carcinoembryonic antigen biomarker in staging, prognosis, and management. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(8):689–97. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr078.PubMedCrossRef Thirunavukarasu P, Sukumar S, Sathaiah M, Mahan M, Pragatheeshwar KD, Pingpank JF et al. C-stage in colon cancer: implications of carcinoembryonic antigen biomarker in staging, prognosis, and management. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(8):689–97. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djr078.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP. Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest. 2005;23(4):338–51.PubMedCrossRef Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP. Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest. 2005;23(4):338–51.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Steele G, Jr., Ellenberg S, Ramming K, O’Connell M, Moertel C, Lessner H et al. CEA monitoring among patients in multi-institutional adjuvant G.I. therapy protocols. Ann Surg. 1982;196(2):162–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Steele G, Jr., Ellenberg S, Ramming K, O’Connell M, Moertel C, Lessner H et al. CEA monitoring among patients in multi-institutional adjuvant G.I. therapy protocols. Ann Surg. 1982;196(2):162–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wingo PA, Jamison PM, Hiatt RA, Weir HK, Gargiullo PM, Hutton M et al. Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control—a comparison between the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14(2):175–93. Wingo PA, Jamison PM, Hiatt RA, Weir HK, Gargiullo PM, Hutton M et al. Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control—a comparison between the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14(2):175–93.
17.
go back to reference Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM et al. International Classification of Disease for Oncology (ed 3), Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 2000. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM et al. International Classification of Disease for Oncology (ed 3), Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 2000.
18.
go back to reference Grambsch PM, Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika. 1994;81:515–6.CrossRef Grambsch PM, Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika. 1994;81:515–6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rubin DB. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(8 Pt 2):757–63.PubMedCrossRef Rubin DB. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(8 Pt 2):757–63.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR. Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(4):327–33.PubMedCrossRef Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR. Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(4):327–33.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rosenbaum PR. Model-based direct adjustment. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987;82:387–94.CrossRef Rosenbaum PR. Model-based direct adjustment. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987;82:387–94.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Elizabeth AS. MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw. 2011;42:1–28.CrossRef Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Elizabeth AS. MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw. 2011;42:1–28.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hansen BB, Klopfer SO. Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows. J Comput Graph Statist. 2006;15:609–27.CrossRef Hansen BB, Klopfer SO. Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows. J Comput Graph Statist. 2006;15:609–27.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jessup JM, Giavazzi R, Campbell D, Cleary K, Morikawa K, Fidler IJ. Growth potential of human colorectal carcinomas in nude mice: association with the preoperative serum concentration of carcinoembryonic antigen in patients. Cancer Res. 1988;48(6):1689–92.PubMed Jessup JM, Giavazzi R, Campbell D, Cleary K, Morikawa K, Fidler IJ. Growth potential of human colorectal carcinomas in nude mice: association with the preoperative serum concentration of carcinoembryonic antigen in patients. Cancer Res. 1988;48(6):1689–92.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Tibbetts LM, Doremus CM, Tzanakakis GN, Vezeridis MP. Liver metastases with 10 human colon carcinoma cell lines in nude mice and association with carcinoembryonic antigen production. Cancer. 1993;71(2):315–21.PubMedCrossRef Tibbetts LM, Doremus CM, Tzanakakis GN, Vezeridis MP. Liver metastases with 10 human colon carcinoma cell lines in nude mice and association with carcinoembryonic antigen production. Cancer. 1993;71(2):315–21.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lin JK, Lin CC, Yang SH, Wang HS, Jiang JK, Lan YT et al. Early postoperative CEA level is a better prognostic indicator than is preoperative CEA level in predicting prognosis of patients with curable colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(9):1135–41. doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1209-5.PubMedCrossRef Lin JK, Lin CC, Yang SH, Wang HS, Jiang JK, Lan YT et al. Early postoperative CEA level is a better prognostic indicator than is preoperative CEA level in predicting prognosis of patients with curable colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(9):1135–41. doi:10.​1007/​s00384-011-1209-5.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, Kang BM, Jun SH. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring after curative resection for colorectal cancer: clinical significance of the preoperative level. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(11):3087–93. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0625-z.PubMedCrossRef Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, Kang BM, Jun SH. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring after curative resection for colorectal cancer: clinical significance of the preoperative level. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(11):3087–93. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-009-0625-z.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Takagawa R, Fujii S, Ohta M, Nagano Y, Kunisaki C, Yamagishi S et al. Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level as a predictive factor of recurrence after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(12):3433–9. doi:10.1245/s10434-008-0168-8.PubMedCrossRef Takagawa R, Fujii S, Ohta M, Nagano Y, Kunisaki C, Yamagishi S et al. Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level as a predictive factor of recurrence after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(12):3433–9. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-008-0168-8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, Fielding LP. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer. 2000;88(7):1739–57.PubMedCrossRef Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, Fielding LP. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer. 2000;88(7):1739–57.PubMedCrossRef
30.
32.
go back to reference Quasar Collaborative G, Gray R, Barnwell J, McConkey C, Hills RK, Williams NS et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with colorectal cancer: a randomised study. Lancet. 2007;370(9604):2020–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61866-2.CrossRef Quasar Collaborative G, Gray R, Barnwell J, McConkey C, Hills RK, Williams NS et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with colorectal cancer: a randomised study. Lancet. 2007;370(9604):2020–9. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(07)61866-2.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictive Value of CEA for Survival in Stage I Rectal Cancer: a Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Authors
Ignazio Tarantino
Rene Warschkow
Bruno M. Schmied
Ulrich Güller
Markus Mieth
Thomas Cerny
Markus W. Büchler
Alexis Ulrich
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3137-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2016 Go to the issue