Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2014

01-06-2014

The Acute Surgical Unit Model Verses the Traditional “On Call” Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors: Vinayak Nagaraja, Guy D. Eslick, Michael R. Cox

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The acute surgical unit (ASU) is a novel model for the provision of emergency general surgery care. The ASU model was initially developed in New South Wales hospitals during 2005 and 2006. Several studies have analysed the effects on patient outcomes and timeliness of care for nontrauma patients presenting with acute general surgical conditions. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of the ASU model compared with the traditional on-call model for specific conditions.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Current Contents Connect, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science. Original data were extracted from each study and used to calculate a pooled odd ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI).

Results

The search identified 18 studies; appendectomy (n = 9), acute cholecystitis (n = 7), and small-bowel obstruction (SBO) (n = 2). In the appendectomy cohort, the proportion of appendicular perforation were similar in pre-ASU and ASU period (OR 1.02, 95 % CI 0.77–1.37, p = 0.13). The incidence of complications in the appendectomy cohort was significantly lower in the ASU group; 14.5 % pre-ASU and 10.9 % post-ASU (OR 1.649, 95 % CI 0.732–3.714, p = 0.009). The negative appendectomy rate was similar for the pre- and post-ASU groups (OR 1.07, 95 % CI 0.88–1.31, p = 0.83). Likewise the conversion rate to open surgery and total hospital stay were similar between the two groups. The proportion of night time operations reduced significantly in the ASU period (OR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.32–2.74, p = 0.001). In the acute cholecystitis cohort, the conversion rate to open surgery was significantly higher in the pre-ASU group (15.1 %) compared with the post-ASU group (7.5 %) (OR 1.879, 95 % CI 1.072–3.293, p = 0.04) The incidence of complications was higher in the pre-ASU (14 %) compared with the post-ASU (6.8 %) group (OR 2.231, 95 % CI 1.372–3.236, p = 0.03). The mean hospital stay was significantly lower in the ASU period (5.3 vs. 3.7 days, p = 0.0063). There was insufficient data available to analyse outcomes for SBO.

Conclusions

The ASU model provides a safe surgical environment for patients and is associated with a reduced complication rate for appendectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. There is a reduced conversion rate and a shorter length of stay for patients with acute cholecystitis. Overall, the ASU model has translated to better outcomes for patients presenting with acute general surgical conditions.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Diaz JJ Jr, Miller RS, May AK et al (2007) Acute care surgery: a functioning program and fellowship training. Surgery 141:310–316PubMedCrossRef Diaz JJ Jr, Miller RS, May AK et al (2007) Acute care surgery: a functioning program and fellowship training. Surgery 141:310–316PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Parasyn AD, Truskett PG, Bennett M et al (2009) Acute-care surgical service: a change in culture. ANZ J Surg 79:12–18PubMedCrossRef Parasyn AD, Truskett PG, Bennett M et al (2009) Acute-care surgical service: a change in culture. ANZ J Surg 79:12–18PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cox MR, Cook L, Dobson J et al (2010) Acute surgical unit: a new model of care. ANZ J Surg 80:419–424PubMedCrossRef Cox MR, Cook L, Dobson J et al (2010) Acute surgical unit: a new model of care. ANZ J Surg 80:419–424PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Von Conrady D, Hamza S, Weber D et al (2010) The acute surgical unit: improving emergency care. ANZ J Surg 80:933–936CrossRef Von Conrady D, Hamza S, Weber D et al (2010) The acute surgical unit: improving emergency care. ANZ J Surg 80:933–936CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Poole GH, Glyn T, Srinivasa S et al (2012) Modular acute system for general surgery: hand over the operation, not the patient. ANZ J Surg 82:156–160PubMedCrossRef Poole GH, Glyn T, Srinivasa S et al (2012) Modular acute system for general surgery: hand over the operation, not the patient. ANZ J Surg 82:156–160PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hsee L, Devaud M, Middelberg L et al (2012) Acute Surgical Unit at Auckland City Hospital: a descriptive analysis. ANZ J Surg 82:588–591PubMedCrossRef Hsee L, Devaud M, Middelberg L et al (2012) Acute Surgical Unit at Auckland City Hospital: a descriptive analysis. ANZ J Surg 82:588–591PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Spain DA, Miller FB (2005) Education and training of the future trauma surgeon in acute care surgery: trauma, critical care, and emergency surgery. Am J Surg 190:212–217PubMedCrossRef Spain DA, Miller FB (2005) Education and training of the future trauma surgeon in acute care surgery: trauma, critical care, and emergency surgery. Am J Surg 190:212–217PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Reilly PM, Schwab CW (2007) Acute care surgery: the academic hospital’s perspective. Surgery 141:299–301PubMedCrossRef Reilly PM, Schwab CW (2007) Acute care surgery: the academic hospital’s perspective. Surgery 141:299–301PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Committee on Acute Care Surgery American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (2007) The acute care surgery curriculum. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 62:553–556CrossRef Committee on Acute Care Surgery American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (2007) The acute care surgery curriculum. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 62:553–556CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Austin MT, Diaz JJJ, Feurer ID et al (2005) Creating an emergency general surgery service enhances the productivity of trauma surgeons, general surgeons and the hospital. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 58:906–910CrossRef Austin MT, Diaz JJJ, Feurer ID et al (2005) Creating an emergency general surgery service enhances the productivity of trauma surgeons, general surgeons and the hospital. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 58:906–910CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Earley AS, Pryor JP, Kim PK et al (2006) An acute care surgery model improves outcomes in patients with appendicitis. Ann Surg 244:498–504PubMedCentralPubMed Earley AS, Pryor JP, Kim PK et al (2006) An acute care surgery model improves outcomes in patients with appendicitis. Ann Surg 244:498–504PubMedCentralPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ekeh AP, Monson B, Wozniak CJ et al (2008) Management of acute appendicitis by an acute care surgery service: is operative intervention timely? J Am Coll Surg 207:43–48PubMedCrossRef Ekeh AP, Monson B, Wozniak CJ et al (2008) Management of acute appendicitis by an acute care surgery service: is operative intervention timely? J Am Coll Surg 207:43–48PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cubas RF, Gomez NR, Rodriguez S et al (2012) Outcomes in the management of appendicitis and cholecystitis in the setting of a new acute care surgery service model: impact on timing and cost. J Am Coll Surg 215:715–721PubMedCrossRef Cubas RF, Gomez NR, Rodriguez S et al (2012) Outcomes in the management of appendicitis and cholecystitis in the setting of a new acute care surgery service model: impact on timing and cost. J Am Coll Surg 215:715–721PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lau B, Difronzo LA (2011) An acute care surgery model improves timeliness of care and reduces hospital stay for patients with acute cholecystitis. Am Surg 77:1318–1321PubMed Lau B, Difronzo LA (2011) An acute care surgery model improves timeliness of care and reduces hospital stay for patients with acute cholecystitis. Am Surg 77:1318–1321PubMed
19.
go back to reference Britt RC, Weireter LJ, Britt LD (2009) Initial implementation of an acute care surgery model: implications for timeliness of care. J Am Coll Surg 209:421–424PubMedCrossRef Britt RC, Weireter LJ, Britt LD (2009) Initial implementation of an acute care surgery model: implications for timeliness of care. J Am Coll Surg 209:421–424PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–1012PubMedCrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–1012PubMedCrossRef
21.
24.
go back to reference Orwin R (1983) A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. J Educ Stat 8:157–159CrossRef Orwin R (1983) A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. J Educ Stat 8:157–159CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gandy RC, Truskett PG, Wong SW et al (2010) Outcomes of appendicectomy in an acute care surgery model. Med J Aust 193:281–284PubMed Gandy RC, Truskett PG, Wong SW et al (2010) Outcomes of appendicectomy in an acute care surgery model. Med J Aust 193:281–284PubMed
26.
go back to reference Notley RG (1997) Unsupervised surgical training: surgical training teaches surgical method, surgical anatomy, and operative skills. BMJ 315:1307–1307PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Notley RG (1997) Unsupervised surgical training: surgical training teaches surgical method, surgical anatomy, and operative skills. BMJ 315:1307–1307PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lehane CW, Jootun RN, Bennett M et al (2010) Does an acute care surgical model improve the management and outcome of acute cholecystitis? ANZ J Surg 80:438–442PubMedCrossRef Lehane CW, Jootun RN, Bennett M et al (2010) Does an acute care surgical model improve the management and outcome of acute cholecystitis? ANZ J Surg 80:438–442PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pepingco L, Eslick GD, Cox MR (2012) The acute surgical unit as a novel model of care for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. Med J Aust 196:509–510PubMedCrossRef Pepingco L, Eslick GD, Cox MR (2012) The acute surgical unit as a novel model of care for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. Med J Aust 196:509–510PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325PubMedCrossRef Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Britt RC, Bouchard C, Weireter LJ et al (2010) Impact of acute care surgery on biliary disease. J Am Coll Surg 210:595–599PubMedCrossRef Britt RC, Bouchard C, Weireter LJ et al (2010) Impact of acute care surgery on biliary disease. J Am Coll Surg 210:595–599PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sorelli PG, El-Masry NS, Dawson PM et al (2008) The dedicated emergency surgeon: towards consultant-based acute surgical admissions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:104–108PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sorelli PG, El-Masry NS, Dawson PM et al (2008) The dedicated emergency surgeon: towards consultant-based acute surgical admissions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:104–108PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Doeksen A, Tanis PJ, Vrouenraets BC et al (2007) Factors determining delay in relaparotomy for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection. World J Gastroenterol 13:3721–3725PubMed Doeksen A, Tanis PJ, Vrouenraets BC et al (2007) Factors determining delay in relaparotomy for anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection. World J Gastroenterol 13:3721–3725PubMed
33.
go back to reference Aitken RJ, Thompson MR, Smith JAE et al (1999) Training in large bowel cancer surgery: observations from three prospective regional United Kingdom audits. BMJ 318:702–703PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Aitken RJ, Thompson MR, Smith JAE et al (1999) Training in large bowel cancer surgery: observations from three prospective regional United Kingdom audits. BMJ 318:702–703PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Qureshi A, Smith A, Wright F et al (2011) The impact of an acute care emergency surgical service on timely surgical decision-making and emergency department overcrowding. J Am Coll Surg 213:284–293PubMedCrossRef Qureshi A, Smith A, Wright F et al (2011) The impact of an acute care emergency surgical service on timely surgical decision-making and emergency department overcrowding. J Am Coll Surg 213:284–293PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Faryniuk AM, Hochman DJ (2013) Effect of an acute care surgical service on the timeliness of care. Can J Surg 56:022911–022911CrossRef Faryniuk AM, Hochman DJ (2013) Effect of an acute care surgical service on the timeliness of care. Can J Surg 56:022911–022911CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Brockman SF, Scott S, Guest GD et al (2013) Does an acute surgical model increase the rate of negative appendicectomy or perforated appendicitis? ANZ J Surg 83:744–747PubMed Brockman SF, Scott S, Guest GD et al (2013) Does an acute surgical model increase the rate of negative appendicectomy or perforated appendicitis? ANZ J Surg 83:744–747PubMed
37.
go back to reference Poh BR, Cashin P, Dubrava Z et al (2013) Impact of an acute care surgery model on appendicectomy outcomes. ANZ J Surg 83:735–738PubMed Poh BR, Cashin P, Dubrava Z et al (2013) Impact of an acute care surgery model on appendicectomy outcomes. ANZ J Surg 83:735–738PubMed
38.
go back to reference Pillai S, Hsee L, Pun A et al (2013) Comparison of appendicectomy outcomes: acute surgical versus traditional pathway. ANZ J Surg 83:739–743PubMed Pillai S, Hsee L, Pun A et al (2013) Comparison of appendicectomy outcomes: acute surgical versus traditional pathway. ANZ J Surg 83:739–743PubMed
39.
go back to reference Mercer SJ, Knight JS, Toh SK et al (2004) Implementation of a specialist-led service for the management of acute gallstone disease. Br J Surg 91:504–508PubMedCrossRef Mercer SJ, Knight JS, Toh SK et al (2004) Implementation of a specialist-led service for the management of acute gallstone disease. Br J Surg 91:504–508PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Lien I, Wong SW, Malouf P et al (2012) Effect of handover on the outcomes of small bowel obstruction in an acute care surgery model. ANZ J Surg 17:1445–2197 Lien I, Wong SW, Malouf P et al (2012) Effect of handover on the outcomes of small bowel obstruction in an acute care surgery model. ANZ J Surg 17:1445–2197
Metadata
Title
The Acute Surgical Unit Model Verses the Traditional “On Call” Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
Vinayak Nagaraja
Guy D. Eslick
Michael R. Cox
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2447-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

World Journal of Surgery 6/2014 Go to the issue