Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Evidence-Based Current Surgical Practice

Rectal Prolapse: An Overview of Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Patient-Specific Management Strategies

Authors: Liliana Bordeianou, Caitlin W. Hicks, Andreas M. Kaiser, Karim Alavi, Ranjan Sudan, Paul E. Wise

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Rectal prolapse can present in a variety of forms and is associated with a range of symptoms including pain, incomplete evacuation, bloody and/or mucous rectal discharge, and fecal incontinence or constipation. Complete external rectal prolapse is characterized by a circumferential, full-thickness protrusion of the rectum through the anus, which may be intermittent or may be incarcerated and poses a risk of strangulation. There are multiple surgical options to treat rectal prolapse, and thus care should be taken to understand each patient’s symptoms, bowel habits, anatomy, and pre-operative expectations. Preoperative workup includes physical exam, colonoscopy, anoscopy, and, in some patients, anal manometry and defecography. With this information, a tailored surgical approach (abdominal versus perineal, minimally invasive versus open) and technique (posterior versus ventral rectopexy +/− sigmoidectomy, for example) can then be chosen. We propose an algorithm based on available outcomes data in the literature, an understanding of anorectal physiology, and expert opinion that can serve as a guide to determining the rectal prolapse operation that will achieve the best possible postoperative outcomes for individual patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kairaluoma MV and Kellokumpu IH. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg 94: 3: 207-210, 2005.PubMed Kairaluoma MV and Kellokumpu IH. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg 94: 3: 207-210, 2005.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, Spino C, Whitehead WE, Wu J, Brody DJ and Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300: 11: 1311-1316, 2008. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, Spino C, Whitehead WE, Wu J, Brody DJ and Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300: 11: 1311-1316, 2008.
3.
go back to reference Bordeianou L, Rockwood T, Baxter N, Lowry A, Mellgren A and Parker S. Does incontinence severity correlate with quality of life? Prospective analysis of 502 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 10: 3: 273-279, 2008.PubMedCrossRef Bordeianou L, Rockwood T, Baxter N, Lowry A, Mellgren A and Parker S. Does incontinence severity correlate with quality of life? Prospective analysis of 502 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 10: 3: 273-279, 2008.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD and Standards Practice Task Force of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 54: 11: 1339-1346, 2011. Varma M, Rafferty J, Buie WD and Standards Practice Task Force of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 54: 11: 1339-1346, 2011.
5.
go back to reference Dvorkin LS, Gladman MA, Epstein J, Scott SM, Williams NS and Lunniss PJ. Rectal intussusception in symptomatic patients is different from that in asymptomatic volunteers. Br J Surg 92: 7: 866-872, 2005.PubMedCrossRef Dvorkin LS, Gladman MA, Epstein J, Scott SM, Williams NS and Lunniss PJ. Rectal intussusception in symptomatic patients is different from that in asymptomatic volunteers. Br J Surg 92: 7: 866-872, 2005.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schey R, Cromwell J and Rao SS. Medical and surgical management of pelvic floor disorders affecting defecation. Am J Gastroenterol 107: 11: 1624-33; quiz p.1634, 2012. Schey R, Cromwell J and Rao SS. Medical and surgical management of pelvic floor disorders affecting defecation. Am J Gastroenterol 107: 11: 1624-33; quiz p.1634, 2012.
7.
go back to reference Liu J, Guaderrama N, Nager CW, Pretorius DH, Master S and Mittal RK. Functional correlates of anal canal anatomy: puborectalis muscle and anal canal pressure. Am J Gastroenterol 101: 5: 1092-1097, 2006.PubMedCrossRef Liu J, Guaderrama N, Nager CW, Pretorius DH, Master S and Mittal RK. Functional correlates of anal canal anatomy: puborectalis muscle and anal canal pressure. Am J Gastroenterol 101: 5: 1092-1097, 2006.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Felt-Bersma RJ, Tiersma ES and Cuesta MA. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, and enterocele. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 37: 3: 645-68, ix, 2008. Felt-Bersma RJ, Tiersma ES and Cuesta MA. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, and enterocele. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 37: 3: 645-68, ix, 2008.
9.
go back to reference Harmston C, Jones OM, Cunningham C and Lindsey I. The relationship between internal rectal prolapse and internal anal sphincter function. Colorectal Dis 13: 7: 791-795, 2011.PubMedCrossRef Harmston C, Jones OM, Cunningham C and Lindsey I. The relationship between internal rectal prolapse and internal anal sphincter function. Colorectal Dis 13: 7: 791-795, 2011.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW and Dietz DW. Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 49: 7: 1052-1058, 2006.PubMedCrossRef Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW and Dietz DW. Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 49: 7: 1052-1058, 2006.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bordeianou L, Lee KY, Rockwood T, Baxter NN, Lowry A, Mellgren A and Parker S. Anal resting pressures at manometry correlate with the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and with presence of sphincter defects on ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 51: 7: 1010-1014, 2008.PubMedCrossRef Bordeianou L, Lee KY, Rockwood T, Baxter NN, Lowry A, Mellgren A and Parker S. Anal resting pressures at manometry correlate with the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and with presence of sphincter defects on ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 51: 7: 1010-1014, 2008.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Woods R, Voyvodic F, Schloithe AC, Sage MR and Wattchow DA. Anal sphincter tears in patients with rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 5: 6: 544-548, 2003.PubMedCrossRef Woods R, Voyvodic F, Schloithe AC, Sage MR and Wattchow DA. Anal sphincter tears in patients with rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 5: 6: 544-548, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Williams JG, Wong WD, Jensen L, Rothenberger DA and Goldberg SM. Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 34: 3: 209-216, 1991.PubMedCrossRef Williams JG, Wong WD, Jensen L, Rothenberger DA and Goldberg SM. Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 34: 3: 209-216, 1991.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, Dolk A, Uden R, Ahlback SO and Holmstrom B. Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 11: 1133-1141, 1994.PubMedCrossRef Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, Dolk A, Uden R, Ahlback SO and Holmstrom B. Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 11: 1133-1141, 1994.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kaufman HS, Buller JL, Thompson JR, Pannu HK, DeMeester SL, Genadry RR, Bluemke DA, Jones B, Rychcik JL and Cundiff GW. Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and cystocolpoproctography alter surgical management of pelvic floor disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 11: 1575-83; discussion 1583-4, 2001. Kaufman HS, Buller JL, Thompson JR, Pannu HK, DeMeester SL, Genadry RR, Bluemke DA, Jones B, Rychcik JL and Cundiff GW. Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and cystocolpoproctography alter surgical management of pelvic floor disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 11: 1575-83; discussion 1583-4, 2001.
16.
go back to reference Maglinte DD, Bartram CI, Hale DA, Park J, Kohli MD, Robb BW, Romano S and Lappas JC. Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Radiology 258: 1: 23-39, 2011.PubMedCrossRef Maglinte DD, Bartram CI, Hale DA, Park J, Kohli MD, Robb BW, Romano S and Lappas JC. Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Radiology 258: 1: 23-39, 2011.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI and Nelson RL. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001758. doi: 4: CD001758, 2008. Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI and Nelson RL. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001758. doi: 4: CD001758, 2008.
18.
go back to reference D’Hoore A and Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 20: 12: 1919-1923, 2006.PubMedCrossRef D’Hoore A and Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc 20: 12: 1919-1923, 2006.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Schowengerdt C and Hunt J. Nineteen years’ experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse. Ann Surg 173: 6: 993-1006, 1971.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Schowengerdt C and Hunt J. Nineteen years’ experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse. Ann Surg 173: 6: 993-1006, 1971.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference Ternent CA, Bastawrous AL, Morin NA, Ellis CN, Hyman NH, Buie WD and Standards Practice Task Force of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the evaluation and management of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 50: 12: 2013-2022, 2007. Ternent CA, Bastawrous AL, Morin NA, Ellis CN, Hyman NH, Buie WD and Standards Practice Task Force of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the evaluation and management of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 50: 12: 2013-2022, 2007.
22.
go back to reference Jorge JM, Habr-Gama A and Wexner SD. Biofeedback therapy in the colon and rectal practice. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 28: 1: 47-61, 2003.PubMedCrossRef Jorge JM, Habr-Gama A and Wexner SD. Biofeedback therapy in the colon and rectal practice. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 28: 1: 47-61, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Khaikin M and Wexner SD. Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. World J Gastroenterol 12: 20: 3168-3173, 2006.PubMed Khaikin M and Wexner SD. Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. World J Gastroenterol 12: 20: 3168-3173, 2006.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Kashanian M, Ali SS, Nazemi M and Bahasadri S. Evaluation of the effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT or Kegel exercise) and assisted pelvic floor muscle training (APFMT) by a resistance device (Kegelmaster device) on the urinary incontinence in women: a randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 159: 1: 218-223, 2011.PubMedCrossRef Kashanian M, Ali SS, Nazemi M and Bahasadri S. Evaluation of the effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT or Kegel exercise) and assisted pelvic floor muscle training (APFMT) by a resistance device (Kegelmaster device) on the urinary incontinence in women: a randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 159: 1: 218-223, 2011.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Barbieri S and Roviaro G. Impact of new technologies on the clinical and functional outcome of Altemeier’s procedure: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 49: 5: 652-660, 2006.PubMedCrossRef Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Barbieri S and Roviaro G. Impact of new technologies on the clinical and functional outcome of Altemeier’s procedure: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 49: 5: 652-660, 2006.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C and Keighley MR. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81: 2: 302-304, 1994.PubMedCrossRef Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C and Keighley MR. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81: 2: 302-304, 1994.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mollen RM, Kuijpers JH and van Hoek F. Effects of rectal mobilization and lateral ligaments division on colonic and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 9: 1283-1287, 2000.PubMedCrossRef Mollen RM, Kuijpers JH and van Hoek F. Effects of rectal mobilization and lateral ligaments division on colonic and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 9: 1283-1287, 2000.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U and Jarvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 7: 4: 219-222, 1992.PubMedCrossRef Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U and Jarvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 7: 4: 219-222, 1992.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aitchison MA and Finlay IG. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174: 2: 145-148, 1992.PubMed McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aitchison MA and Finlay IG. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174: 2: 145-148, 1992.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC and Lewis AA. Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81: 6: 904-906, 1994.PubMedCrossRef Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC and Lewis AA. Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81: 6: 904-906, 1994.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Selvaggi F, Scotto di Carlo E, Silvestri L, Festa L and Piegari V. Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: a randomized study. British Journal of Surgery 80: S89, 1993.CrossRef Selvaggi F, Scotto di Carlo E, Silvestri L, Festa L and Piegari V. Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse: a randomized study. British Journal of Surgery 80: S89, 1993.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ and Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 78: 12: 1431-1433, 1991.PubMedCrossRef Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ and Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 78: 12: 1431-1433, 1991.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA and Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 89: 1: 35-39, 2002.PubMedCrossRef Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA and Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 89: 1: 35-39, 2002.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Winde G, Reers B, Nottberg H, Berns T, Meyer J and Bunte H. Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy with absorbable mesh-graft for treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Eur J Surg 159: 5: 301-305, 1993.PubMed Winde G, Reers B, Nottberg H, Berns T, Meyer J and Bunte H. Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy with absorbable mesh-graft for treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Eur J Surg 159: 5: 301-305, 1993.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Galili Y and Rabau M. Comparison of polyglycolic acid and polypropylene mesh for rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse. Eur J Surg 163: 6: 445-448, 1997.PubMed Galili Y and Rabau M. Comparison of polyglycolic acid and polypropylene mesh for rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse. Eur J Surg 163: 6: 445-448, 1997.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Raftopoulos Y, Senagore AJ, Di Giuro G, Bergamaschi R and Rectal Prolapse Recurrence Study Group. Recurrence rates after abdominal surgery for complete rectal prolapse: a multicenter pooled analysis of 643 individual patient data. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 6: 1200-1206, 2005. Raftopoulos Y, Senagore AJ, Di Giuro G, Bergamaschi R and Rectal Prolapse Recurrence Study Group. Recurrence rates after abdominal surgery for complete rectal prolapse: a multicenter pooled analysis of 643 individual patient data. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 6: 1200-1206, 2005.
37.
go back to reference Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW, Jr and Dietz DW. Recurrence and quality of life following perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 12: 8: 1446-1451, 2008.PubMedCrossRef Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW, Jr and Dietz DW. Recurrence and quality of life following perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 12: 8: 1446-1451, 2008.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Kohler A and Athanasiadis S. The value of posterior levator repair in the treatment of anorectal incontinence due to rectal prolapse—a clinical and manometric study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386: 3: 188-192, 2001.PubMedCrossRef Kohler A and Athanasiadis S. The value of posterior levator repair in the treatment of anorectal incontinence due to rectal prolapse—a clinical and manometric study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386: 3: 188-192, 2001.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bachoo P, Brazzelli M and Grant A. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): 2: CD001758, 2000. Bachoo P, Brazzelli M and Grant A. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): 2: CD001758, 2000.
40.
go back to reference Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J and Muller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3): 3: CD003145, 2005. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J and Muller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3): 3: CD003145, 2005.
41.
go back to reference Sileri P, Franceschilli L, de Luca E, Lazzaro S, Angelucci GP, Fiaschetti V, Pasecenic C and Gaspari AL. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biological mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results. J Gastrointest Surg 16: 3: 622-628, 2012.PubMedCrossRef Sileri P, Franceschilli L, de Luca E, Lazzaro S, Angelucci GP, Fiaschetti V, Pasecenic C and Gaspari AL. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse using biological mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results. J Gastrointest Surg 16: 3: 622-628, 2012.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Srinivasa S, Bissett IP and Hill AG. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a higher intraoperative complication rate than open surgery. Ann Surg 253: 1: 35-43, 2011.PubMedCrossRef Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Srinivasa S, Bissett IP and Hill AG. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a higher intraoperative complication rate than open surgery. Ann Surg 253: 1: 35-43, 2011.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Paraskevas P, Ziprin P and Darzi A. A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 10: 1930-1940, 2005.PubMedCrossRef Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Paraskevas P, Ziprin P and Darzi A. A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 10: 1930-1940, 2005.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Germain A, Thibault F, Galifet M, Scherrer ML, Ayav A, Hubert J, Brunaud L and Bresler L. Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Surg Endosc 27: 2: 525-529, 2013.PubMedCrossRef Germain A, Thibault F, Galifet M, Scherrer ML, Ayav A, Hubert J, Brunaud L and Bresler L. Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Surg Endosc 27: 2: 525-529, 2013.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Makela-Kaikkonen J, Rautio T, Klintrup K, Takala H, Vierimaa M, Ohtonen P and Makela J. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications. Tech Coloproctol 2013. Makela-Kaikkonen J, Rautio T, Klintrup K, Takala H, Vierimaa M, Ohtonen P and Makela J. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications. Tech Coloproctol 2013.
46.
go back to reference Munz Y, Moorthy K, Kudchadkar R, Hernandez JD, Martin S, Darzi A and Rockall T. Robotic assisted rectopexy. Am J Surg 187: 1: 88-92, 2004.PubMedCrossRef Munz Y, Moorthy K, Kudchadkar R, Hernandez JD, Martin S, Darzi A and Rockall T. Robotic assisted rectopexy. Am J Surg 187: 1: 88-92, 2004.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW and Bouvy ND. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50: 11: 1825-1830, 2007.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG, Greve JW and Bouvy ND. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50: 11: 1825-1830, 2007.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rectal Prolapse: An Overview of Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Patient-Specific Management Strategies
Authors
Liliana Bordeianou
Caitlin W. Hicks
Andreas M. Kaiser
Karim Alavi
Ranjan Sudan
Paul E. Wise
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2427-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 5/2014 Go to the issue