Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 7/2013

01-07-2013 | Original Article

Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Milligan–Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy in Circumferential Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Long-Term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Jong-Sun Kim, Yogesh K. Vashist, Sabrina Thieltges, Oliver Zehler, Karim A. Gawad, Emre F. Yekebas, Jakob R. Izbicki, Asad Kutup

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The literature indicates higher recurrence rates for stapled hemorrhoidopexy than for conventional techniques. This could be due to inappropriate patient selection.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcome after stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with the Milligan–Morgan procedure in a homogeneous patient population with circumferential third-degree hemorrhoids.

Design and Patients

One hundred thirty patients were enrolled into a randomized controlled study, of which 122 were clinically evaluated at weeks 1, 2, and 4, and thereafter each year for a minimum of 3 years. Patients completed a questionnaire for symptoms, function, and pain. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale. Recurrences were determined by anoscopy and self-report.

Settings

The study was performed at the University Hospital Hamburg.

Main Outcome Measures

Endpoints were pain, recurrence, bleeding, itching/burning, urinary retention, incontinence symptoms, and prolonged rate of wound healing.

Results

The cumulative recurrence rates after 5 years were 18 % (n = 11) in the stapled hemorrhoidopexy group and 23 % (n = 14) in the Milligan–Morgan group (p = 0.65). Patients who underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy had significantly less postoperative pain with mean VAS scores at week 1: 3.1 vs. 6.2; week 2: 0.5 vs. 3; week 4: 0.05 vs. 0.6 (p < 0.001), and demonstrated less burning/itching sensation 4 weeks after surgery compared with the Milligan–Morgan group (4.9 vs. 19.7 %; p < 0.001). The postoperative bleeding rate was 4.9 % in both groups and the rate of urinary retention did not differ significantly (4.9 % vs. 1.6 %; p = 0.309). Postoperative incontinence symptoms (6.6 % versus 3.3 %; p = 0.40) resolved within the first 6 months.

Limitations

Detailed measurement of incontinence was not possible because postoperative symptoms resolved between consultations, and pathological results were examined retrospectively.

Conclusions

The results show a similar rate of recurrence in the long term and suggest increased patient comfort in the early postoperative course after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. In patients with circumferential third-degree hemorrhoids, stapled hemorrhoidopexy is as effective as the Milligan–Morgan procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R et al. Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Arch Surg 2009;144(3):266–272.PubMedCrossRef Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R et al. Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. conventional hemorrhoidectomy. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Arch Surg 2009;144(3):266–272.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled studies. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47(11):1837–1845.PubMedCrossRef Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled studies. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47(11):1837–1845.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:878–892.PubMedCrossRef Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:878–892.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional haemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1297–1305.PubMedCrossRef Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional haemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1297–1305.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zacharakis E, Kanellos D, Pramateftakis MG et al. Long-term results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy for fourth-degree haemorrhoids: a prospective study with median follow-up of 6 years. Tech Coloproctol 2007;11(2):144–147.PubMedCrossRef Zacharakis E, Kanellos D, Pramateftakis MG et al. Long-term results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy for fourth-degree haemorrhoids: a prospective study with median follow-up of 6 years. Tech Coloproctol 2007;11(2):144–147.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Finco C, Sarzo G, Savastano S et al. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth-degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile? Colorectal Dis 2006;8(2): 130–134.PubMedCrossRef Finco C, Sarzo G, Savastano S et al. Stapled haemorrhoidopexy in fourth-degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile? Colorectal Dis 2006;8(2): 130–134.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendáriz P et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:809–815.PubMedCrossRef Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendáriz P et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:809–815.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ceci F, Picchio M, Palimento D et al. Long-term outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III and grade IV hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:1107–1112.PubMedCrossRef Ceci F, Picchio M, Palimento D et al. Long-term outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III and grade IV hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:1107–1112.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Van de Stadt J, D'Hoore A, Duinslaeger M et al. Long-term results after excision haemorrhoidectomy versus stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids: a Belgian prospective randomized trial. Acta Chir Belg 2005; 105(1):44–52.PubMed Van de Stadt J, D'Hoore A, Duinslaeger M et al. Long-term results after excision haemorrhoidectomy versus stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids: a Belgian prospective randomized trial. Acta Chir Belg 2005; 105(1):44–52.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G et al. Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2007;94(8):1033–1037.PubMedCrossRef Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G et al. Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2007;94(8):1033–1037.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U et al. Stapled vs. open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006 Oct;21(7):668–669. Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U et al. Stapled vs. open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006 Oct;21(7):668–669.
12.
go back to reference Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G et al. Haemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19(3):239–244.PubMedCrossRef Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G et al. Haemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19(3):239–244.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ et al. Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361(9367):1437–1438.PubMedCrossRef Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ et al. Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361(9367):1437–1438.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gravie JF, Lehur PA, Huten N et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg 2005;242(1):29–35.PubMedCrossRef Gravie JF, Lehur PA, Huten N et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up. Ann Surg 2005;242(1):29–35.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemmingway DM. Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs. conventional haemorrhoidectomy: a three and a half year follow up. Colorectal Dis 2004;6(1):37–38.PubMedCrossRef Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemmingway DM. Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy vs. conventional haemorrhoidectomy: a three and a half year follow up. Colorectal Dis 2004;6(1):37–38.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circumferential suturing device: a new procedure. Monduzzi Editore, 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Bologna, 1998:777–784. Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circumferential suturing device: a new procedure. Monduzzi Editore, 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Bologna, 1998:777–784.
17.
go back to reference Delbos A. Management of post-operative pain on surgical wards. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1998;17:649–662.PubMedCrossRef Delbos A. Management of post-operative pain on surgical wards. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1998;17:649–662.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I. Day-case stapled (circumferential) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy. A randomised, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:93–99.PubMedCrossRef Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I. Day-case stapled (circumferential) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy. A randomised, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:93–99.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M et al. Randomized controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circumferential hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapsed. Am J Surg 2001;182: 64–68.PubMedCrossRef Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M et al. Randomized controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circumferential hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapsed. Am J Surg 2001;182: 64–68.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G. Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:245–251.PubMedCrossRef Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G. Stapled transanal rectal resection versus stapled anopexy in the cure of hemorrhoids associated with rectal prolapse. A randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:245–251.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendáriz P, De Miguel M. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48(4):809–815. Review.CrossRef Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendáriz P, De Miguel M. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48(4):809–815. Review.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schmidt J, Dogan N, Langenbach R et al. Fecal urge incontinence after stapled anopexia for prolapse and hemorrhoids: a prospective, observational study. World J Surg 2009; 33:355–364.PubMedCrossRef Schmidt J, Dogan N, Langenbach R et al. Fecal urge incontinence after stapled anopexia for prolapse and hemorrhoids: a prospective, observational study. World J Surg 2009; 33:355–364.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C et al. Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1449–1455.PubMedCrossRef Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C et al. Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001;88:1449–1455.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Schwandner O, Stuto A. Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year results of the European STARR Registry. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52(7):1205–1212.PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Schwandner O, Stuto A. Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year results of the European STARR Registry. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52(7):1205–1212.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE et al. Stapled vs. excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2002;137(3):337–340.PubMedCrossRef Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE et al. Stapled vs. excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2002;137(3):337–340.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Naldini G, Martellucci J, Moraldi L. Is simple mucosal resection really possible? Considerations about histological findings after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24(5):537–541.PubMedCrossRef Naldini G, Martellucci J, Moraldi L. Is simple mucosal resection really possible? Considerations about histological findings after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24(5):537–541.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kam MH Mathur P, Peng XH et al. Correlation of histology with anorectal function following stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48(7):1437–1441.PubMedCrossRef Kam MH Mathur P, Peng XH et al. Correlation of histology with anorectal function following stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48(7):1437–1441.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Calomino N Martellucci J, Fontani A et al. Care with regard to details improves the outcome of Longo mucoprolapsectomy: long-term follow up. Updates Surg 2011;63(3):151–149.PubMedCrossRef Calomino N Martellucci J, Fontani A et al. Care with regard to details improves the outcome of Longo mucoprolapsectomy: long-term follow up. Updates Surg 2011;63(3):151–149.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Panarese A, Pironi D, Vendettuoli M et al. Stapled and conventional Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: different solutions for different targets. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27(4):483–487. Epub 2011 Nov 4.PubMedCrossRef Panarese A, Pironi D, Vendettuoli M et al. Stapled and conventional Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: different solutions for different targets. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27(4):483–487. Epub 2011 Nov 4.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Manfredelli S, Montalto G, Leonetti G et al. Conventional (CH) vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SH) in surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. Ten years experience. Ann Ital Chir 2012;83(2):129–134.PubMed Manfredelli S, Montalto G, Leonetti G et al. Conventional (CH) vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SH) in surgical treatment of hemorrhoids. Ten years experience. Ann Ital Chir 2012;83(2):129–134.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Arslani N, Patrlj L, Rajković Z, Papeš D et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22(1):58–61.PubMedCrossRef Arslani N, Patrlj L, Rajković Z, Papeš D et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing Ligasure versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22(1):58–61.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Milligan–Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy in Circumferential Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Long-Term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
Jong-Sun Kim
Yogesh K. Vashist
Sabrina Thieltges
Oliver Zehler
Karim A. Gawad
Emre F. Yekebas
Jakob R. Izbicki
Asad Kutup
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2220-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 7/2013 Go to the issue