Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2013

01-03-2013 | Original Article

Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery for Obese Patients: Decreased Conversions with the Hand-Assisted Technique

Authors: Helen M. Heneghan, Sean T. Martin, Ravi P. Kiran, Wisam Khoury, Luca Stocchi, Feza H. Remzi, Jon D. Vogel

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic surgery benefits obese patients but technical difficulties associated with suboptimal exposure and access in these subjects may prompt conversion to open surgery. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) confers advantages over standard laparoscopy (LAP) by facilitating tactile feedback, assisted dissection, and retraction. These benefits could be particularly valuable in obese patients, allowing completion of difficult laparoscopic procedures in this subgroup. Our aim was to compare intra-operative and post-operative outcomes of HALS and LAP approaches in obese patients undergoing colorectal resection at our institution.

Methods

A retrospective study of a prospectively maintained laparoscopic colorectal surgery database was performed. HALS and LAP cases performed in obese patients (body mass index (BMI) >30) were identified and compared for the following outcomes: operative time, intra-operative complications, rate of conversion to open, blood loss, length of stay, post-operative morbidity, and mortality. Outcomes for the converted patients were included on an intention-to-treat basis for all primary analyses. A secondary analysis of nonconverted and converted cases was also performed.

Results

Over a 5-year period, 496 obese patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection; 86 HALS and 410 LAP cases. The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, BMI, and indications for surgery. Conversion to open surgery was less often necessary in HALS compared to LAP cases (3.5 % vs. 12.7 %, p = 0.014). The LAP group had a significantly smaller incision length for specimen extraction (HALS (7.0 ± 1.3 cm) vs. LAP (5.7 ± 2.1 cm), p < 0.001). Length of stay, operative time, morbidity, and mortality rates were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion

In obese patients who require colectomy, the HALS approach increases the likelihood of a successful minimally invasive operation. At the cost of a clinically negligible increase in incision length, HALS may save a high-risk group conversion to formal laparotomy and the adverse outcomes related to this.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 2010; 303(3):235–41.PubMedCrossRef Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 2010; 303(3):235–41.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Field AE, Coakley EH, Must A, et al. Impact of overweight on the risk of developing common chronic diseases during a 10-year period. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161(13):1581–6.PubMedCrossRef Field AE, Coakley EH, Must A, et al. Impact of overweight on the risk of developing common chronic diseases during a 10-year period. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161(13):1581–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, et al. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA 1999; 282(16):1523–9.PubMedCrossRef Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, et al. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA 1999; 282(16):1523–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pasulka PS, Bistrian BR, Benotti PN, et al. The risks of surgery in obese patients. Ann Intern Med 1986; 104(4):540–6.PubMed Pasulka PS, Bistrian BR, Benotti PN, et al. The risks of surgery in obese patients. Ann Intern Med 1986; 104(4):540–6.PubMed
5.
go back to reference The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350(20):2050–9.CrossRef The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350(20):2050–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365(9472):1718–26.PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365(9472):1718–26.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hazebroek EJ. COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(6):949–53.PubMedCrossRef Hazebroek EJ. COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(6):949–53.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, et al. Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 2008; 248(5):728–38.PubMedCrossRef Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, et al. Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 2008; 248(5):728–38.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359(9325):2224–9.PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359(9325):2224–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10(1):44–52.PubMedCrossRef Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10(1):44–52.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97(11):1638–45.PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97(11):1638–45.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ballian N, Yamane B, Leverson G, et al. Body mass index does not affect postoperative morbidity and oncologic outcomes of total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17(6):1606–13.PubMedCrossRef Ballian N, Yamane B, Leverson G, et al. Body mass index does not affect postoperative morbidity and oncologic outcomes of total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17(6):1606–13.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Delaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ, et al. Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48(5):975–81.PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ, et al. Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48(5):975–81.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Healy LA, Ryan AM, Sutton E, et al. Impact of obesity on surgical and oncological outcomes in the management of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25(11):1293–9.PubMedCrossRef Healy LA, Ryan AM, Sutton E, et al. Impact of obesity on surgical and oncological outcomes in the management of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25(11):1293–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Khoury W, Stocchi L, Geisler D. Outcomes after laparoscopic intestinal resection in obese versus non-obese patients. Br J Surg 2011; 98(2):293–8.PubMedCrossRef Khoury W, Stocchi L, Geisler D. Outcomes after laparoscopic intestinal resection in obese versus non-obese patients. Br J Surg 2011; 98(2):293–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Park JW, Lim SW, Choi HS, et al. The impact of obesity on outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Asians. Surg Endosc 2010; 24(7):1679–85.PubMedCrossRef Park JW, Lim SW, Choi HS, et al. The impact of obesity on outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Asians. Surg Endosc 2010; 24(7):1679–85.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Scheidbach H, Benedix F, Hugel O, et al. Laparoscopic approach to colorectal procedures in the obese patient: risk factor or benefit? Obes Surg 2008; 18(1):66–70.PubMedCrossRef Scheidbach H, Benedix F, Hugel O, et al. Laparoscopic approach to colorectal procedures in the obese patient: risk factor or benefit? Obes Surg 2008; 18(1):66–70.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schwandner O, Farke S, Schiedeck TH, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: do differences in body mass indices lead to different outcomes? Surg Endosc 2004; 18(10):1452–6.PubMedCrossRef Schwandner O, Farke S, Schiedeck TH, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: do differences in body mass indices lead to different outcomes? Surg Endosc 2004; 18(10):1452–6.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ozturk E, da Luz Moreira A, Vogel JD. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: the learning curve is for operative speed, not for quality. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12(10 Online):e304-9.CrossRef Ozturk E, da Luz Moreira A, Vogel JD. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: the learning curve is for operative speed, not for quality. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12(10 Online):e304-9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sonoda T, Pandey S, Trencheva K, et al. Longterm complications of hand-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208(1):62–6.PubMedCrossRef Sonoda T, Pandey S, Trencheva K, et al. Longterm complications of hand-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 208(1):62–6.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vogel JD, Lian L, Kalady MF, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic right colectomy: how does it compare to conventional laparoscopy? J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212(3):367–72.PubMedCrossRef Vogel JD, Lian L, Kalady MF, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic right colectomy: how does it compare to conventional laparoscopy? J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212(3):367–72.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yun HR, Cho YK, Cho YB, et al. Comparison and short-term outcomes between hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for anterior resections of left-sided colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25(8):975–81.PubMedCrossRef Yun HR, Cho YK, Cho YB, et al. Comparison and short-term outcomes between hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for anterior resections of left-sided colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25(8):975–81.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cima RR, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, et al. Utility and short-term outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single-institution experience in 1103 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54(9):1076–81.PubMedCrossRef Cima RR, Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, et al. Utility and short-term outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single-institution experience in 1103 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54(9):1076–81.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Moloo H, Haggar F, Coyle D, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010(10):CD006585.PubMed Moloo H, Haggar F, Coyle D, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010(10):CD006585.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Pattan-Arun J, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer surgery: feasibility, short-term, and oncological outcomes. Surgery 2010; 148(2):378–85.PubMedCrossRef Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Pattan-Arun J, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal cancer surgery: feasibility, short-term, and oncological outcomes. Surgery 2010; 148(2):378–85.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bratzler DW, Houck PM. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Am J Surg 2005; 189(4):395–404.PubMedCrossRef Bratzler DW, Houck PM. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Am J Surg 2005; 189(4):395–404.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, Privitera A, et al. Minimally invasive colectomy for Crohn's colitis: a single institution experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010; 16(11):1940–6.PubMedCrossRef Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, Privitera A, et al. Minimally invasive colectomy for Crohn's colitis: a single institution experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2010; 16(11):1940–6.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pendlimari R, Touzios JG, Azodo IA, et al. Short-term outcomes after elective minimally invasive colectomy for diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2011; 98(3):431–5.PubMedCrossRef Pendlimari R, Touzios JG, Azodo IA, et al. Short-term outcomes after elective minimally invasive colectomy for diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2011; 98(3):431–5.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference El-Gazzaz G, Geisler D, Hull T. Risk of clinical leak after laparoscopic versus open bowel anastomosis. Surg Endosc 2010; 24(8):1898–903.PubMedCrossRef El-Gazzaz G, Geisler D, Hull T. Risk of clinical leak after laparoscopic versus open bowel anastomosis. Surg Endosc 2010; 24(8):1898–903.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ozturk E, Kiran RP, Geisler DP, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: benefits of laparoscopic colectomy at no extra cost. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209(2):242–7.PubMedCrossRef Ozturk E, Kiran RP, Geisler DP, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: benefits of laparoscopic colectomy at no extra cost. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209(2):242–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Aalbers AG, Doeksen A, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12(4):287–95.PubMedCrossRef Aalbers AG, Doeksen A, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12(4):287–95.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Li JC, Lee JF, Ng SS, et al. Conversion in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for right colon cancer: risk factors and clinical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25(8):983–8.PubMedCrossRef Li JC, Lee JF, Ng SS, et al. Conversion in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for right colon cancer: risk factors and clinical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25(8):983–8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference HALS Study Group. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2000; 14(10):896–901.CrossRef HALS Study Group. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2000; 14(10):896–901.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51(6):818–26; discussion 826–8.PubMedCrossRef Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51(6):818–26; discussion 826–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery for Obese Patients: Decreased Conversions with the Hand-Assisted Technique
Authors
Helen M. Heneghan
Sean T. Martin
Ravi P. Kiran
Wisam Khoury
Luca Stocchi
Feza H. Remzi
Jon D. Vogel
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2089-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2013 Go to the issue