Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2013

01-03-2013 | Original Article

Preoperative Chemotherapy Does Not Adversely Affect Pancreatic Structure and Short-Term Outcome after Pancreatectomy

Authors: Nicolò Pecorelli, Marco Braga, Claudio Doglioni, Gianpaolo Balzano, Michele Reni, Stefano Cereda, Luca Albarello, Renato Castoldi, Giovanni Capretti, Valerio Di Carlo

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Preoperative chemotherapy (PCHT) has recently been proposed also in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Few data are currently available on the impact of PCHT on short-term postoperative outcome after pancreatic resection. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of PCHT on pancreatic structure and short-term outcome after surgical resection.

Methods

Fifty consecutive patients successfully underwent resection after PCHT. Each patient was matched with two control patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma selected from our prospective electronic database. Match criteria were age (±3 years), gender, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, type of resection, pancreatic duct diameter (±1 mm), and tumor size (±5 mm). Primary endpoint was morbidity rate. Secondary endpoints were pancreatic parenchymal structure, mortality rate, and length of hospital stay (LOS).

Results

Both degree of fibrosis and fatty infiltration of the pancreas were similar in the two groups. Overall morbidity rate was 48.0 % in the PCHT group vs. 54.0 % in the control group (p = 0.37). Pancreatic fistula rate was 18.0 % in the PCHT group vs. 25.0 % in the control group (p = 0.41). Mortality was 4.0 % in the PCHT group vs. 2.0 % in the control group (p = 0.60). Mean LOS (days) was 12.7 in the PCHT group vs. 12.4 in the control group (p = 0.74). There was no difference in resection margin status, while the rate of patients without nodal involvement was higher in the PCHT group (46.0 vs. 23.0 %, p = 0.004).

Conclusion

PCHT did not induce significant structural changes in pancreatic parenchyma and did not adversely affect short-term outcome after surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reni M, Cereda S, Balzano G, et al. Outcome of upfront combination chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2009; 64(6): 1253–1259.PubMedCrossRef Reni M, Cereda S, Balzano G, et al. Outcome of upfront combination chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2009; 64(6): 1253–1259.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Katz MH, Pisters PW, Evans DB, et al.: Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: The importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206:833–846.PubMedCrossRef Katz MH, Pisters PW, Evans DB, et al.: Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: The importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206:833–846.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Büschenfelde C, et al. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 2010 Apr 20;7(4):e1000267. Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Büschenfelde C, et al. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 2010 Apr 20;7(4):e1000267.
4.
go back to reference Raut CP, Evans DB, Crane CH, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 2004;13:639–661CrossRef Raut CP, Evans DB, Crane CH, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 2004;13:639–661CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Palmer DH, Stocken DD, Hewitt H, et al. A randomized phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 2088–2096PubMedCrossRef Palmer DH, Stocken DD, Hewitt H, et al. A randomized phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 2088–2096PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Karoui M, Penna C, Amin-Hashem M, et al. Influence of preoperative chemotherapy on the risk of major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 2006;243:1–7PubMedCrossRef Karoui M, Penna C, Amin-Hashem M, et al. Influence of preoperative chemotherapy on the risk of major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 2006;243:1–7PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Buie WD, MacLean AR, Attard JA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation increases the risk of pelvic sepsis after radical excision of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48(10): 1868–74.PubMedCrossRef Buie WD, MacLean AR, Attard JA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation increases the risk of pelvic sepsis after radical excision of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48(10): 1868–74.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tsikitis VL, Larson DW, Poola VP, et al. Postoperative morbidity with diversion after low anterior resection in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: a single institution experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209(1): 114–118PubMedCrossRef Tsikitis VL, Larson DW, Poola VP, et al. Postoperative morbidity with diversion after low anterior resection in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: a single institution experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209(1): 114–118PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(1): 11–20.PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(1): 11–20.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind CH (eds). Exocrine pancreas. In: AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. New York: Springer; 2002; 157. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH (eds). Exocrine pancreas. In: AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. New York: Springer; 2002; 157.
11.
go back to reference Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Capretti G et al. Effect of surgeon volume on outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16(3): 518–523.PubMedCrossRef Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Capretti G et al. Effect of surgeon volume on outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16(3): 518–523.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001; 358: 1487–1492.PubMedCrossRef Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001; 358: 1487–1492.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138:8–13.PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138:8–13.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, et al. Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 2008; 95:1387–1393.PubMedCrossRef Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, et al. Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 2008; 95:1387–1393.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2006; 244:931–937.PubMedCrossRef DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2006; 244:931–937.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H, et al. A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB (Oxford) 2010; 12(10): 696–702CrossRef Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H, et al. A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB (Oxford) 2010; 12(10): 696–702CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M, et al. Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg 2007, 246:1058–1064.PubMedCrossRef Mathur A, Pitt HA, Marine M, et al. Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg 2007, 246:1058–1064.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, et al. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 2006; 244:10–15.PubMedCrossRef Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, et al. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 2006; 244:10–15.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Seiler CA, Wagner M, Bachmann T, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whipple resection-long term results. Br J Surg 2005; 92:547–556.PubMedCrossRef Seiler CA, Wagner M, Bachmann T, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whipple resection-long term results. Br J Surg 2005; 92:547–556.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1200–1210PubMedCrossRef Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1200–1210PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with Gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative intent resection of pancreatic cancer. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 297: 267–277PubMedCrossRef Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with Gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative intent resection of pancreatic cancer. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 297: 267–277PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Heinrich S, Schafer M, Weber A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy generates a significant tumor response in resectable pancreatic cancer without increasing morbidity: results of a prospective phase II trial. Ann Surg. 2008; 248:1014–1022PubMedCrossRef Heinrich S, Schafer M, Weber A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy generates a significant tumor response in resectable pancreatic cancer without increasing morbidity: results of a prospective phase II trial. Ann Surg. 2008; 248:1014–1022PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, et al. Effect of hospital volume on the outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 357–362.PubMedCrossRef Balzano G, Zerbi A, Capretti G, et al. Effect of hospital volume on the outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 357–362.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hartman DJ, Krasinskas AM. Assessing Treatment Effect in Pancreatic Cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012; 136(1): 100–109.PubMedCrossRef Hartman DJ, Krasinskas AM. Assessing Treatment Effect in Pancreatic Cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012; 136(1): 100–109.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Katz MH, Varadhachary GR, Fleming JB, et al. Serum CA 19-9 as a marker of resectability and survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17(7):1794–801.PubMedCrossRef Katz MH, Varadhachary GR, Fleming JB, et al. Serum CA 19-9 as a marker of resectability and survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17(7):1794–801.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRef Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006; 13(8):1035–46.PubMedCrossRef Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006; 13(8):1035–46.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preoperative Chemotherapy Does Not Adversely Affect Pancreatic Structure and Short-Term Outcome after Pancreatectomy
Authors
Nicolò Pecorelli
Marco Braga
Claudio Doglioni
Gianpaolo Balzano
Michele Reni
Stefano Cereda
Luca Albarello
Renato Castoldi
Giovanni Capretti
Valerio Di Carlo
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2063-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2013 Go to the issue