Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2012

01-04-2012 | Original Article

Outcomes for Consecutive Patients Undergoing Single-Site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Authors: David B. Stewart, Evangelos Messaris

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Single-site laparoscopy (SSL) represents an innovation whose wider adoption may be limited by technical challenges and a current dearth of outcomes data.

Methods

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on all consecutive laparoscopic colorectal resections, including elective and emergent surgeries. Patient demographics and operative details were collected, and outcomes were analyzed for 30 days following surgery.

Results

Forty-one single-site laparoscopic procedures were performed, with 12 (29%) being nonelective. Surgeries included seven right colectomies, eight sigmoidectomies, four ileocolectomies, five total colectomies, two low anterior resections, and two abdominoperineal resections. The most frequent indication for surgery was inflammatory bowel disease (31.7%), followed by cancer (24.4%) and diverticular disease (24.4%). Thirty-seven percent of the patients had undergone previous abdominal surgery, with 64% of these having undergone previous laparotomy. One (2.5%) patient required conversion to multiple trocar laparoscopy, and five (12%) required conversion to laparotomy. Mean length of hospital stay was 4.2 days for SSL without a conversion. There was one anastomotic leak, no postoperative bleeding, no surgical site infections, and no deaths. The readmission rate was 14%.

Conclusions

SSL is safe when applied to unselected patients undergoing colorectal surgery, including those patients who have undergone a previous laparotomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005: CD00314. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005: CD00314.
2.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2224–2229.PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2224–2229.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zimmern A, Prasad L, Desouza A, Marecik S, Park J, Abcarian H. Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg 2010; 34: 1954–1958.PubMedCrossRef Zimmern A, Prasad L, Desouza A, Marecik S, Park J, Abcarian H. Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg 2010; 34: 1954–1958.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sodergren MH, Clark J, Athanasiou T, Teare J, Yang GZ, Darzi A. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: critical appraisal of applications in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 680–687.PubMedCrossRef Sodergren MH, Clark J, Athanasiou T, Teare J, Yang GZ, Darzi A. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: critical appraisal of applications in clinical practice. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 680–687.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leroy J, Cahill RA, Perretta S, Forgione A, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) applied totally to sigmoidectomy: an original technique with survival in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 24–30.PubMedCrossRef Leroy J, Cahill RA, Perretta S, Forgione A, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) applied totally to sigmoidectomy: an original technique with survival in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 24–30.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Knol J, D’Hondt M, Dozois EJ, Vanden Boer J, Malisse P. Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy with transanal specimen extraction: a bridge to NOTES? Tech Coloproctol 2009; 13: 65–68.PubMedCrossRef Knol J, D’Hondt M, Dozois EJ, Vanden Boer J, Malisse P. Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy with transanal specimen extraction: a bridge to NOTES? Tech Coloproctol 2009; 13: 65–68.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 823–826.PubMedCrossRef Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 823–826.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 1013–1016.PubMedCrossRef Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 1013–1016.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 1549–5154.PubMedCrossRef Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 1549–5154.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ross H, Steele S, Whiteford M, Lee S, Albert M, Mutch M, Rivadeneira D, Marcello P. Early multi-institution experience with single-incision laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 187–192.PubMedCrossRef Ross H, Steele S, Whiteford M, Lee S, Albert M, Mutch M, Rivadeneira D, Marcello P. Early multi-institution experience with single-incision laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 187–192.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ross H, Simmang C, Fleshman J, Marcello PW. Adoption of laparoscopic colectomy: results and implications of ASCRS hands-on course participation. Surg Innov 2008; 15: 179–183.PubMedCrossRef Ross H, Simmang C, Fleshman J, Marcello PW. Adoption of laparoscopic colectomy: results and implications of ASCRS hands-on course participation. Surg Innov 2008; 15: 179–183.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lee S. Laparoscopic procedures for colon and rectal cancer surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2009; 22: 218–224.PubMedCrossRef Lee S. Laparoscopic procedures for colon and rectal cancer surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2009; 22: 218–224.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Robinson C, Chen G, Balentine C, Sansgiry S, Marshall CL, Anaya DA, Artinyan A, Albo D, Berger DH. Minimally invasive surgery is underutilized for colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 1412–1418.PubMedCrossRef Robinson C, Chen G, Balentine C, Sansgiry S, Marshall CL, Anaya DA, Artinyan A, Albo D, Berger DH. Minimally invasive surgery is underutilized for colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 1412–1418.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bosker R, Groen H, Hoff C, Totte E, Ploeg R, Pierie JP. Effect of proctoring on implementation and results of elective laparoscopic colon surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 941–947.PubMedCrossRef Bosker R, Groen H, Hoff C, Totte E, Ploeg R, Pierie JP. Effect of proctoring on implementation and results of elective laparoscopic colon surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26: 941–947.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Franks PJ, Bosanquet N, Thorpe H, Brown JM, Copeland J, Smith AM, Quirke P, Guillou PJ; CLASICC trial participants. Short-term costs of conventional vs laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial). Br J Cancer 2006; 95: 6–12.PubMedCrossRef Franks PJ, Bosanquet N, Thorpe H, Brown JM, Copeland J, Smith AM, Quirke P, Guillou PJ; CLASICC trial participants. Short-term costs of conventional vs laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial). Br J Cancer 2006; 95: 6–12.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM; Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 477–484.PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM; Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 477–484.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Marcello PW. Single incision laparoscopic colectomy: boutique surgery or the new standard? Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 660–661.PubMedCrossRef Marcello PW. Single incision laparoscopic colectomy: boutique surgery or the new standard? Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 660–661.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Geisler D, Condon E, Remzi F. Single incision laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileopouch anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 941–943.PubMedCrossRef Geisler D, Condon E, Remzi F. Single incision laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileopouch anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 941–943.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Geisler D, Kirat H, Remzi F. Single-port laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: initial operative experience. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2175–2178.PubMedCrossRef Geisler D, Kirat H, Remzi F. Single-port laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: initial operative experience. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2175–2178.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chambers W, Bicsak M, Lamparelli M, Dixon AR. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in complex colorectal surgery: a technique offering potential and not just cosmesis. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 393–398.PubMedCrossRef Chambers W, Bicsak M, Lamparelli M, Dixon AR. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in complex colorectal surgery: a technique offering potential and not just cosmesis. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 393–398.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Leblanc F, Makhija R, Champagne B, Delaney CP. Single incision laparoscopic total colectomy and proctocolectomy for benign disease–initial experience. Colorectal Dis 2010 Oct 19. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02448.x. [Epub ahead of print]. Leblanc F, Makhija R, Champagne B, Delaney CP. Single incision laparoscopic total colectomy and proctocolectomy for benign disease–initial experience. Colorectal Dis 2010 Oct 19. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1463-1318.​2010.​02448.​x. [Epub ahead of print].
22.
go back to reference Lu KC, Cone MM, Diggs BS, Rea JD, Herzig DO. Laparoscopic converted to open colectomy: predictors and outcomes from the nationwide inpatient sample. Am J Surg 2011; 201: 630–634.CrossRef Lu KC, Cone MM, Diggs BS, Rea JD, Herzig DO. Laparoscopic converted to open colectomy: predictors and outcomes from the nationwide inpatient sample. Am J Surg 2011; 201: 630–634.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ragupathi M, Ramos-Valadez D, Yaakovian M, Haas EM. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a novel approach through a Pfannenstiel incision. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 15: 61–65.PubMedCrossRef Ragupathi M, Ramos-Valadez D, Yaakovian M, Haas EM. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a novel approach through a Pfannenstiel incision. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 15: 61–65.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcomes for Consecutive Patients Undergoing Single-Site Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
Authors
David B. Stewart
Evangelos Messaris
Publication date
01-04-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1783-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2012 Go to the issue