Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2009

01-12-2009 | 2009 SSAT Poster Presentation

The Value of High-Resolution Manometry in the Assessment of the Resting Characteristics of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter

Authors: Shahin Ayazi, Jeffrey A. Hagen, Joerg Zehetner, Oliver Ross, Calvin Wu, Arzu Oezcelik, Emmanuele Abate, Helen J. Sohn, Farzaneh Banki, John C. Lipham, Steven R. DeMeester, Tom R. DeMeester

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 12/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is faster and easier to perform than conventional water perfused manometry. There is general acceptance of its usefulness in evaluating upper esophageal sphincter and esophageal body. There has been less emphasis on the use of HRM to evaluate the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure and length, both factors important in LES barrier function. The aim of this study was to compare the resting characteristics of the LES determined by HRM and conventional manometry in the same patients.

Methods

We performed both HRM and conventional manometry including a slow motorized pull-through technique in 55 patients with foregut symptoms. The characteristics of the LES analyzed were: resting pressure, total length, and abdominal length. Four available modes of HRM analysis were used to assess resting characteristics of the LES: spatiotemporal mode using both abrupt color change and isobaric contour, line tracing, and pressure profile. The values obtained from these four HRM modes were then compared to the conventional manometry measurements.

Results

High-resolution manometry and conventional manometry did not differ in their measurement of LES resting pressure. LES overall and abdominal length were consistently overestimated by HRM. A variability up to 4 cm in overall length was observed and was greatest in patients with hiatal hernia (1.8 vs. 0.9 cm, p = 0.027).

Conclusion

The current construction of the catheter and software analysis used in high-resolution manometry do not allow precise measurement of LES length. Errors in the identification of the upper border of the sphincter may compromise accurate positioning of a pH probe.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Sifrim D. High-resolution manometry and impedance-pH/manometry: valuable tools in clinical and investigational esophagology. Gastroenterology 2008;135(3):756–769.CrossRefPubMed Kahrilas PJ, Sifrim D. High-resolution manometry and impedance-pH/manometry: valuable tools in clinical and investigational esophagology. Gastroenterology 2008;135(3):756–769.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Campos GM, Oberg S, Gastal O, et al. Manometry of the lower esophageal sphincter: inter- and intraindividual variability of slow motorized pull-through versus station pull-through manometry. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48(6):1057–1061.CrossRefPubMed Campos GM, Oberg S, Gastal O, et al. Manometry of the lower esophageal sphincter: inter- and intraindividual variability of slow motorized pull-through versus station pull-through manometry. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48(6):1057–1061.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ayazi S, Hagen JA, Chan LS, et al. Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux: quantifying the association between body mass index, esophageal acid exposure, and lower esophageal sphincter status in a large series of patients with reflux symptoms. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13(8):1440–1447.CrossRefPubMed Ayazi S, Hagen JA, Chan LS, et al. Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux: quantifying the association between body mass index, esophageal acid exposure, and lower esophageal sphincter status in a large series of patients with reflux symptoms. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13(8):1440–1447.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Clouse RE, Staiano A, Alrakawi A, Haroian L. Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95(10):2720–2730.CrossRefPubMed Clouse RE, Staiano A, Alrakawi A, Haroian L. Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95(10):2720–2730.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Takasaki K, Umeki H, Enatsu K, et al. Investigation of pharyngeal swallowing function using high-resolution manometry. Laryngoscope 2008;118(10):1729–1732.CrossRefPubMed Takasaki K, Umeki H, Enatsu K, et al. Investigation of pharyngeal swallowing function using high-resolution manometry. Laryngoscope 2008;118(10):1729–1732.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, et al. Deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation: a study of 75 volunteer subjects using solid-state high-resolution manometry. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006;291(3):G525–G531.CrossRefPubMed Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, et al. Deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation: a study of 75 volunteer subjects using solid-state high-resolution manometry. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006;291(3):G525–G531.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, et al. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103(1):27–37.PubMed Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, et al. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103(1):27–37.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42(5):627–635.CrossRefPubMed Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago Classification. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42(5):627–635.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Lodhia N, Kahrilas PJ. Utilizing intraluminal pressure gradients to predict esophageal clearance: a validation study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103(8):1898–1905.CrossRefPubMed Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Lodhia N, Kahrilas PJ. Utilizing intraluminal pressure gradients to predict esophageal clearance: a validation study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103(8):1898–1905.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ayazi S, Lipham JC, Portale G, et al. Bravo catheter-free pH monitoring: normal values, concordance, optimal diagnostic thresholds, and accuracy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7(1):60–67.CrossRefPubMed Ayazi S, Lipham JC, Portale G, et al. Bravo catheter-free pH monitoring: normal values, concordance, optimal diagnostic thresholds, and accuracy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7(1):60–67.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ayazi S, Leers JM, Oezcelik A, et al. Measurement of gastric pH in ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Surg Endosc 2009;23(9):1968–1973.CrossRefPubMed Ayazi S, Leers JM, Oezcelik A, et al. Measurement of gastric pH in ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Surg Endosc 2009;23(9):1968–1973.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mekapati J, Knight LC, Maurer AH, et al. Transsphincteric pH profile at the gastroesophageal junction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6(6):630–634.CrossRefPubMed Mekapati J, Knight LC, Maurer AH, et al. Transsphincteric pH profile at the gastroesophageal junction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6(6):630–634.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pandolfino JE, Lee TJ, Schreiner MA, et al. Comparison of esophageal acid exposure at 1 cm and 6 cm above the squamocolumnar junction using the Bravo pH monitoring system. Dis Esophagus 2006;19(3):177–182.CrossRefPubMed Pandolfino JE, Lee TJ, Schreiner MA, et al. Comparison of esophageal acid exposure at 1 cm and 6 cm above the squamocolumnar junction using the Bravo pH monitoring system. Dis Esophagus 2006;19(3):177–182.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Challenging the limits of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 2008;134(1):16–18.CrossRefPubMed Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Challenging the limits of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 2008;134(1):16–18.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Naspetti R, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg. 1991;214(4):374–383.CrossRefPubMed Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Naspetti R, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg. 1991;214(4):374–383.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Code CF, Fyke FE, Schlegel JF. The gastroesophageal sphincter in healthy human beings. Gastroenterologia 1956;86(3):135–150.CrossRefPubMed Code CF, Fyke FE, Schlegel JF. The gastroesophageal sphincter in healthy human beings. Gastroenterologia 1956;86(3):135–150.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Value of High-Resolution Manometry in the Assessment of the Resting Characteristics of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter
Authors
Shahin Ayazi
Jeffrey A. Hagen
Joerg Zehetner
Oliver Ross
Calvin Wu
Arzu Oezcelik
Emmanuele Abate
Helen J. Sohn
Farzaneh Banki
John C. Lipham
Steven R. DeMeester
Tom R. DeMeester
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 12/2009
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1042-0

Other articles of this Issue 12/2009

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2009 Go to the issue