Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 1/2008

01-01-2008

How Many Lymph Nodes Properly Stage a Periampullary Malignancy?

Authors: Juan C. Gutierrez, Dido Franceschi, Leonidas G. Koniaris, MD

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The impact of lymphadenectomy in prognosis and staging in periampullary malignancies remains largely undefined. We examined all pancreaticoduodenectomies for periampullary carcinomas in the SEER cancer registry from 1993 through 2003. Overall, 5465 pancreaticoduodenectomies for nonmetastatic periampullary carcinomas were identified. The cohort was comprised of 62.5% pancreatic, 18.9% ampullary, 11.6% distal bile duct, and 7.0% duodenal cancers. A linear association between the number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and overall survival was observed overall and for pancreas and ampullary cancers for node-negative (N0) disease. Median survival for all patients with localized, N0 disease improved from 24 to 31 months, with sampling of a minimum of 10 LNs, whereas 2 and 5-year survival improved from 52 and 29%, with <10 nodes examined to 58 and 37% with 10+ nodes examined (P < 0.001). A 1-month median survival advantage was seen in patients with node-positive disease when more than 10 lymph nodes examined (15 versus 16 months, P < 0.001). Significantly better median survival and cure rates are observed after pancreaticoduodenectomy for localized periampullary adenocarcinoma when a minimum of 10 lymph nodes are examined. This benefit likely represents more accurate staging. To optimize the prognostic accuracy and prevent stage migration errors in multicenter trials a minimum of 10 lymph nodes should be obtained and examined before the determination of node-negative disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cameron JL. Current surgical therapy, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2004. Cameron JL. Current surgical therapy, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2004.
2.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56(2):106–130.PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56(2):106–130.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’Graggen K. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: Toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003;138(12):1310–1314; discussion 1315.PubMedCrossRef Buchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’Graggen K. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: Toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003;138(12):1310–1314; discussion 1315.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL. Pancreatic cancer: State-of-the-art care. CA Cancer J Clin 2000;50(4):241–268.PubMedCrossRef Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL. Pancreatic cancer: State-of-the-art care. CA Cancer J Clin 2000;50(4):241–268.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sitzmann JV, Hruban RH, Goodman SN, Dooley WC, Coleman J, Pitt HA. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann Surg 1995;221(6):721–731; discussion 731–733.PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sitzmann JV, Hruban RH, Goodman SN, Dooley WC, Coleman J, Pitt HA. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann Surg 1995;221(6):721–731; discussion 731–733.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C, Antes G, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 2007;245(2):187–200.PubMedCrossRef Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C, Antes G, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 2007;245(2):187–200.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fortner JG. Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. Surgery 1973;73(2):307–320.PubMed Fortner JG. Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. Surgery 1973;73(2):307–320.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sohn TA, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Abrams RA, Hruban RH. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: Part 2. Randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 2002;236(3):355–366; discussion 366–368.PubMedCrossRef Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sohn TA, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Abrams RA, Hruban RH. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: Part 2. Randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 2002;236(3):355–366; discussion 366–368.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Satake K, Nishiwaki H, Yokomatsu H, Kawazoe Y, Kim K, Haku A, Umeyama K, Miyazaki I. Surgical curability and prognosis for standard versus extended resection for T1 carcinoma of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;175(3):259–265.PubMed Satake K, Nishiwaki H, Yokomatsu H, Kawazoe Y, Kim K, Haku A, Umeyama K, Miyazaki I. Surgical curability and prognosis for standard versus extended resection for T1 carcinoma of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;175(3):259–265.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K, Ohta T, Tsukioka Y, Miyazaki I. Surgical strategy for carcinoma of the pancreas head area based on clinicopathologic analysis of nodal involvement and plexus invasion. Surgery 1995;117(6):616–623.PubMedCrossRef Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K, Ohta T, Tsukioka Y, Miyazaki I. Surgical strategy for carcinoma of the pancreas head area based on clinicopathologic analysis of nodal involvement and plexus invasion. Surgery 1995;117(6):616–623.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Manabe T, Ohshio G, Baba N, Miyashita T, Asano N, Tamura K, Yamaki K, Nonaka A, Tobe T. Radical pancreatectomy for ductal cell carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer 1989;64(5):1132–1137.PubMedCrossRef Manabe T, Ohshio G, Baba N, Miyashita T, Asano N, Tamura K, Yamaki K, Nonaka A, Tobe T. Radical pancreatectomy for ductal cell carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer 1989;64(5):1132–1137.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, Kloppel G, Dhaene K, Michelassi F. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg 1998;228(4):508–517.PubMedCrossRef Pedrazzoli S, DiCarlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, Kloppel G, Dhaene K, Michelassi F. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann Surg 1998;228(4):508–517.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Henne-Bruns D, Vogel I, Luttges J, Kloppel G, Kremer B. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head: Survival after regional versus extended lymphadenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45(21):855–866.PubMed Henne-Bruns D, Vogel I, Luttges J, Kloppel G, Kremer B. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head: Survival after regional versus extended lymphadenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45(21):855–866.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: Information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(9):1189–1200.PubMedCrossRef Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: Information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(9):1189–1200.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Koniaris L, Kaushal S, Abrams RA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—616 patients: Results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4(6):567–579.PubMedCrossRef Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Koniaris L, Kaushal S, Abrams RA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—616 patients: Results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4(6):567–579.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Khanna A, Walker GR, Livingstone AS, Arheart KL, Rocha-Lima C, Koniaris LG. Is adjuvant 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma beneficial? A meta-analysis of an unanswered question. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10(5):689–697.PubMedCrossRef Khanna A, Walker GR, Livingstone AS, Arheart KL, Rocha-Lima C, Koniaris LG. Is adjuvant 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma beneficial? A meta-analysis of an unanswered question. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10(5):689–697.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference White RR, Kattan MW, Haney JC, Clary BM, Pappas TN, Tyler DS, Brennan MF. Evaluation of preoperative therapy for pancreatic cancer using a prognostic nomogram. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(11):1485–1492.PubMedCrossRef White RR, Kattan MW, Haney JC, Clary BM, Pappas TN, Tyler DS, Brennan MF. Evaluation of preoperative therapy for pancreatic cancer using a prognostic nomogram. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(11):1485–1492.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Surveillance E, and End Results (SEER) Program http://www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence—SEER 17 Regs Limited-Use, Nov 2005 Sub (1973–2003), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2006, based on the November 2005 submission. Surveillance E, and End Results (SEER) Program http://​www.​seer.​cancer.​gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence—SEER 17 Regs Limited-Use, Nov 2005 Sub (1973–2003), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2006, based on the November 2005 submission.
19.
go back to reference Fritz AG. International classification of diseases for oncology: ICD-O, 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000. Fritz AG. International classification of diseases for oncology: ICD-O, 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000.
20.
go back to reference Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(28):7114–7124.PubMedCrossRef Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(28):7114–7124.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Bottcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: Ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg 1998;228(4):449–461.PubMedCrossRef Siewert JR, Bottcher K, Stein HJ, Roder JD. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: Ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg 1998;228(4):449–461.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Shimizu Y, Torii A, Hirai T, Yasui K, Morimoto T, Kato T, Kito T. The number of metastatic lymph nodes: A promising prognostic determinant for gastric carcinoma in the latest edition of the TNM classification. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187(6):597–603.PubMedCrossRef Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Shimizu Y, Torii A, Hirai T, Yasui K, Morimoto T, Kato T, Kito T. The number of metastatic lymph nodes: A promising prognostic determinant for gastric carcinoma in the latest edition of the TNM classification. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187(6):597–603.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Roukos DH, Lorenz M, Karakostas K, Paraschou P, Batsis C, Kappas AM. Pathological serosa and node-based classification accurately predicts gastric cancer recurrence risk and outcome, and determines potential and limitation of a Japanese-style extensive surgery for Western patients: A prospective with quality control 10-year follow-up study. Br J Cancer 2001;84(12):1602–1609.PubMedCrossRef Roukos DH, Lorenz M, Karakostas K, Paraschou P, Batsis C, Kappas AM. Pathological serosa and node-based classification accurately predicts gastric cancer recurrence risk and outcome, and determines potential and limitation of a Japanese-style extensive surgery for Western patients: A prospective with quality control 10-year follow-up study. Br J Cancer 2001;84(12):1602–1609.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lee HY, Choi HJ, Park KJ, Shin JS, Kwon HC, Roh MS, Kim C. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colon carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14(5):1712–1717.PubMedCrossRef Lee HY, Choi HJ, Park KJ, Shin JS, Kwon HC, Roh MS, Kim C. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colon carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14(5):1712–1717.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, Mayer RJ, Macdonald JS, Catalano PJ, Haller DG. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: A secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 2003;21(15):2912–2919.PubMedCrossRef Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, Mayer RJ, Macdonald JS, Catalano PJ, Haller DG. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: A secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 2003;21(15):2912–2919.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10(1):65–71.PubMedCrossRef Swanson RS, Compton CC, Stewart AK, Bland KI. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10(1):65–71.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, Layfield LJ. Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106(2):209–216.PubMed Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, Layfield LJ. Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106(2):209–216.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Sosa JA, Diener-West M, Gusev Y, Choti MA, Lange JR, Dooley WC, Zeiger MA. Association between extent of axillary lymph node dissection and survival in patients with stage I breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5(2):140–149.PubMedCrossRef Sosa JA, Diener-West M, Gusev Y, Choti MA, Lange JR, Dooley WC, Zeiger MA. Association between extent of axillary lymph node dissection and survival in patients with stage I breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5(2):140–149.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Polednak AP. Survival of lymph node-negative breast cancer patients in relation to number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg 2003;237(2):163–167.PubMedCrossRef Polednak AP. Survival of lymph node-negative breast cancer patients in relation to number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg 2003;237(2):163–167.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
How Many Lymph Nodes Properly Stage a Periampullary Malignancy?
Authors
Juan C. Gutierrez
Dido Franceschi
Leonidas G. Koniaris, MD
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0251-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 1/2008 Go to the issue