Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2006

01-11-2006

Evaluation of Preoperative Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Using a Prognostic Nomogram

Authors: Rebekah R. White, MD, Michael W. Kattan, PhD, John C. Haney, MD, Bryan M. Clary, MD, Theodore N. Pappas, MD, Douglas S. Tyler, MD, Murray F. Brennan, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 11/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Theoretical benefits of preoperative chemoradiation therapy (preop CRT) for pancreatic cancer include improved efficacy, resectability, and patient selection. The goal of this study was to evaluate the applicability of a nomogram, which was developed for patients undergoing resection without preop CRT and which incorporates several post-resection pathological factors, to a population of patients who received preop CRT prior to resection.

Methods

From 1994 to 2004, 82 patients with biopsy-proven, radiographically localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head underwent preop CRT followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD); 50 concurrent patients underwent PD without preop CRT. Mean nomogram-predicted disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were compared with observed DSS rates from the time of resection.

Results

Despite having more locally advanced tumors on initial staging (21 vs. 8%; < .05), patients who received preop CRT had smaller resected tumors (mean 2.3 vs. 3.1 cm; < .01), were less likely to have T3 tumors (54 vs. 80%, < .01), were less likely to have positive lymph nodes (29 vs. 58%, < .01), and had fewer positive lymph nodes (mean .4 vs. 1.9, < .01), all factors that imply treatment effect and favorably impact on nomogram-predicted DSS. Observed DSS was similar to predicted DSS in both groups.

Conclusions

The similarity in observed and predicted DSS following resection in patients who received preop CRT suggests that the effects of preop CRT—whether treatment, selection, or no effect—are reflected by the nomogram. The ability of the nomogram to evaluate the effects of preop CRT on survival is limited by the potential effects of preop CRT on factors within the nomogram.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg 1985; 120:899–903PubMed Kalser MH, Ellenberg SS. Pancreatic cancer. Adjuvant combined radiation and chemotherapy following curative resection. Arch Surg 1985; 120:899–903PubMed
2.
go back to reference Klinkenbijl JH, Jeekel J, Sahmoud T, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group. Ann Surg 1999; 230:776–84CrossRefPubMed Klinkenbijl JH, Jeekel J, Sahmoud T, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil after curative resection of cancer of the pancreas and periampullary region: phase III trial of the EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group. Ann Surg 1999; 230:776–84CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1200–10CrossRefPubMed Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Friess H, et al. A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1200–10CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Abrams RA, Grochow LB, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival. A prospective, single-institution experience. Ann Surg 1997; 225:621–36CrossRefPubMed Yeo CJ, Abrams RA, Grochow LB, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival. A prospective, single-institution experience. Ann Surg 1997; 225:621–36CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Spitz FR, Abbruzzese JL, Lee JE, et al. Preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:928–37PubMed Spitz FR, Abbruzzese JL, Lee JE, et al. Preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:928–37PubMed
6.
go back to reference White RR, Hurwitz HI, Morse MA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:758–65CrossRefPubMed White RR, Hurwitz HI, Morse MA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:758–65CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hoffman JP, Lipsitz S, Pisansky T, et al. Benson AB, 3rd. Phase II trial of preoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy for patients with localized, resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:317–23PubMed Hoffman JP, Lipsitz S, Pisansky T, et al. Benson AB, 3rd. Phase II trial of preoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy for patients with localized, resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:317–23PubMed
8.
go back to reference Brennan MF, Kattan MW, Klimstra D, et al. Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2004; 240:293–8CrossRefPubMed Brennan MF, Kattan MW, Klimstra D, et al. Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2004; 240:293–8CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ferrone CR, Kattan MW, Tomlinson JS, et al. Validation of a postresection pancreatic adenocarcinoma nomogram for disease-specific survival. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:7529–35CrossRefPubMed Ferrone CR, Kattan MW, Tomlinson JS, et al. Validation of a postresection pancreatic adenocarcinoma nomogram for disease-specific survival. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:7529–35CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ghali WA, Quan H, Brant R, et al. Comparison of 2 methods for calculating adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models. JAMA 2001; 286:1494–7CrossRefPubMed Ghali WA, Quan H, Brant R, et al. Comparison of 2 methods for calculating adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models. JAMA 2001; 286:1494–7CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Conlon KC, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF. Long-term survival after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clinicopathologic analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg 1996; 223:273–9CrossRefPubMed Conlon KC, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF. Long-term survival after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clinicopathologic analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg 1996; 223:273–9CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Breslin TM, Hess KR, Harbison DB, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: treatment variables and survival duration. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:123–32CrossRefPubMed Breslin TM, Hess KR, Harbison DB, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: treatment variables and survival duration. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:123–32CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference White RR, Xie HB, Gottfried MR, et al. Significance of histological response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12:214–21CrossRefPubMed White RR, Xie HB, Gottfried MR, et al. Significance of histological response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12:214–21CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of Preoperative Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Using a Prognostic Nomogram
Authors
Rebekah R. White, MD
Michael W. Kattan, PhD
John C. Haney, MD
Bryan M. Clary, MD
Theodore N. Pappas, MD
Douglas S. Tyler, MD
Murray F. Brennan, MD
Publication date
01-11-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 11/2006
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9104-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2006

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2006 Go to the issue