Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Original Article

Subgrouping of intermediate-stage (BCLC stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma based on tumor number and size and Child–Pugh grade correlated with prognosis after transarterial chemoembolization

Authors: Koichiro Yamakado, Shiro Miyayama, Shozo Hirota, Kimiyoshi Mizunuma, Kenji Nakamura, Yoshitaka Inaba, Hiroaki Maeda, Kunihiro Matsuo, Norifumi Nishida, Takeshi Aramaki, Hiroshi Anai, Shinichi Koura, Shigeo Oikawa, Ken Watanabe, Taku Yasumoto, Kinya Furuichi, Masato Yamaguchi

Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To find a subgroup that benefits most from transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in terms of tumor number and size and liver profile in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods

Data of 325 intermediate-stage HCC patients who received TACE as the initial treatment were gathered. Four tumor numbers (3–6 tumors) and five maximum tumor diameters (3–7 cm) as well as all of their combinations but one (3 tumors and 3 cm) and Child–Pugh grade were used as variables to ascertain prognostic factors.

Results

The respective 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates in all patients were 86.5, 47.0, and 23.7 %, respectively. Tumor numbers of 4 (P = 0.00145) and 5 (P = 0.036), and tumor size of 7 cm (P = 0.015), and 12 other combinations of tumor number and size, and Child–Pugh grade (P = 0.0015) were identified as significant prognostic factors in univariate analysis, and 4 tumors of 7 cm (P = 0.0008) and Child–Pugh grade (P = 0.0036) remained significant in the stepwise Cox proportional hazard model. The overall survival was significantly better in a patient subgroup having two factors other than patient subgroups having one or no prognostic factors.

Conclusion

A patient subgroup having two prognostic factors benefited most from TACE in intermediate-stage HCC patients.
Literature
2.
go back to reference de Lope CR, Tremosini S, Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Management of HCC. J Hepatol. 2012;56(Suppl 1):S75–87.PubMedCrossRef de Lope CR, Tremosini S, Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Management of HCC. J Hepatol. 2012;56(Suppl 1):S75–87.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cammà C, Schepis F, Orlando A, Albanese M, Shahied L, Trevisani F, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiology. 2002;224:47–54.PubMedCrossRef Cammà C, Schepis F, Orlando A, Albanese M, Shahied L, Trevisani F, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiology. 2002;224:47–54.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003;37:429–42.PubMedCrossRef Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003;37:429–42.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Llovet JM, Real MI, Montaña X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, et al. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1734–9.PubMedCrossRef Llovet JM, Real MI, Montaña X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, et al. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1734–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, Liu CL, Lam CM, Poon RT, et al. Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;35:1164–71.PubMedCrossRef Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, Liu CL, Lam CM, Poon RT, et al. Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;35:1164–71.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yamakado K, Miyayama S, Hirota S, Mizunuma K, Nakamura K, Inaba Y, et al. Hepatic arterial embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas: do technical factors affect prognosis? Jpn J Radiol. 2012;30(7):560–6.PubMedCrossRef Yamakado K, Miyayama S, Hirota S, Mizunuma K, Nakamura K, Inaba Y, et al. Hepatic arterial embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas: do technical factors affect prognosis? Jpn J Radiol. 2012;30(7):560–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bruix J, Sherman M. Practice guidelines committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208–36.PubMedCrossRef Bruix J, Sherman M. Practice guidelines committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208–36.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bolondi L, Burroughs A, Dufour JF, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, et al. Heterogeneity of patients with intermediate (BCLC B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: proposal for a subclassification to facilitate treatment decisions. Semin Liver Dis. 2012;32(4):348–59.PubMed Bolondi L, Burroughs A, Dufour JF, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, et al. Heterogeneity of patients with intermediate (BCLC B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: proposal for a subclassification to facilitate treatment decisions. Semin Liver Dis. 2012;32(4):348–59.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R, Bhoori S, Schiavo M, Mariani L, et al. Metroticket Investigator Study Group. Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):35–43.PubMedCrossRef Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R, Bhoori S, Schiavo M, Mariani L, et al. Metroticket Investigator Study Group. Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):35–43.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Subgrouping of intermediate-stage (BCLC stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma based on tumor number and size and Child–Pugh grade correlated with prognosis after transarterial chemoembolization
Authors
Koichiro Yamakado
Shiro Miyayama
Shozo Hirota
Kimiyoshi Mizunuma
Kenji Nakamura
Yoshitaka Inaba
Hiroaki Maeda
Kunihiro Matsuo
Norifumi Nishida
Takeshi Aramaki
Hiroshi Anai
Shinichi Koura
Shigeo Oikawa
Ken Watanabe
Taku Yasumoto
Kinya Furuichi
Masato Yamaguchi
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Japanese Journal of Radiology / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1867-1071
Electronic ISSN: 1867-108X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-014-0298-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Japanese Journal of Radiology 5/2014 Go to the issue