Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 12/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Article

Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction

Authors: Frank Wilde, Henning Hanken, Florian Probst, Alexander Schramm, Max Heiland, Carl-Peter Cornelius

Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Issue 12/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

 For the new generation of mandibular reconstruction, patient-specific mandible reconstruction plates (PSMPs) have been developed which are milled from titanium after preoperative computer planning using CAD/CAM procedures. Resection margins and plate position are determined by surgical guides. In addition, length and shape of the plate and the number and angulation of the screw holes can be planned.

Methods

 30 patients received such PSMP. Indication ranged from stabilization osteosynthesis, single alloplastic stand-alone reconstruction to microvascular reconstructions. Time for planning, fit of surgical guides and plates, pre-/postoperative occlusion, radiological position of the temporo mandibular joint and complications were recorded.

Results

 The median time for online planning was 35 min. The results concerning fit and handling of the PSMP and the surgical guides were mainly very positive. In six cases, the plan had to be adapted to the intraoperative clinical needs. The postoperative position of the condyles in the temporo mandibular fossae was regular in 28 cases. The evaluation of the occlusion was not representative due to not clearly identifiable occlusion in 2/3 of the cases. Nevertheless, complications like postoperative extraoral plate exposure, infection, graft and flap necrosis or difficulties to position the guides or the plate during surgery occurred.

Conclusions

 Mandibular reconstruction with PSMP offers a broad range of opportunities and benefits compared with standard procedures and can be recommended for all kind of mandibular reconstructions. It is not yet foreseeable whether PSMP will in future become routine clinical practice for mandibular reconstruction or will be confined to selected isolated cases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hallermann W, Olsen S, Bardyn T, Taghizadeh F, Banic A, Iizuka T (2006) A new method for computer-aided operation planning for extensive mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2431–2437CrossRefPubMed Hallermann W, Olsen S, Bardyn T, Taghizadeh F, Banic A, Iizuka T (2006) A new method for computer-aided operation planning for extensive mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2431–2437CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Baker A, McMahon J, Parmar S (2001) Immediate reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible after tumor surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:1333–1339CrossRefPubMed Baker A, McMahon J, Parmar S (2001) Immediate reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible after tumor surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:1333–1339CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schimmele S (2001) Delayed reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible after tumor surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:1340–1344CrossRefPubMed Schimmele S (2001) Delayed reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible after tumor surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:1340–1344CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Schraag C, Yang-Ming C, Chi-Ying T, Fu-Chan W (2006) Complete rehabilitation of the mandible following segmental resection. J Surg Oncol 94:538–545CrossRef Schraag C, Yang-Ming C, Chi-Ying T, Fu-Chan W (2006) Complete rehabilitation of the mandible following segmental resection. J Surg Oncol 94:538–545CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wilde F, Winter K, Kletsch K, Lorenz K, Schramm A (2015) Mandible reconstruction using patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of standard and transfer key methods. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10:129–140CrossRefPubMed Wilde F, Winter K, Kletsch K, Lorenz K, Schramm A (2015) Mandible reconstruction using patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of standard and transfer key methods. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10:129–140CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Toro C, Robiony M, Costa M, Zerman N, Politi M (2007) Feasibility of preoperative planning using anatomical facsimile models for mandibular reconstruction. Head Face Med 15(3):5CrossRef Toro C, Robiony M, Costa M, Zerman N, Politi M (2007) Feasibility of preoperative planning using anatomical facsimile models for mandibular reconstruction. Head Face Med 15(3):5CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wilde F, Plail M, Riese C, Schramm A, Winter K (2011) Mandible reconstruction with patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of a transfer key method to the standard method - results of an in vitro study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7:57–63CrossRefPubMed Wilde F, Plail M, Riese C, Schramm A, Winter K (2011) Mandible reconstruction with patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of a transfer key method to the standard method - results of an in vitro study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7:57–63CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wilde F, Cornelius C-P, Schramm A (2014) Computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction using a patient-specific reconstruction plate fabricated with computer-aided design and manufacturing techniques. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 7:158–166PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Wilde F, Cornelius C-P, Schramm A (2014) Computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction using a patient-specific reconstruction plate fabricated with computer-aided design and manufacturing techniques. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 7:158–166PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Essig H, Rana M, Kokemueller H, von See C, Ruecker M, Tavassol F, Gellrich NC (2011) Pre-operative planning for mandibular reconstruction—a full digital planning workflow resulting in a patient specific reconstruction. Head Neck Oncol 3:45PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Essig H, Rana M, Kokemueller H, von See C, Ruecker M, Tavassol F, Gellrich NC (2011) Pre-operative planning for mandibular reconstruction—a full digital planning workflow resulting in a patient specific reconstruction. Head Neck Oncol 3:45PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Freudlsperger C, Bodem JP, Engel E, Hoffmann J (2014) Mandibular reconstruction with a prefabricated free vascularized fibula and implant-supported prosthesis based on fully three-dimensional virtual planning. J Craniofac Surg 25:980–982CrossRefPubMed Freudlsperger C, Bodem JP, Engel E, Hoffmann J (2014) Mandibular reconstruction with a prefabricated free vascularized fibula and implant-supported prosthesis based on fully three-dimensional virtual planning. J Craniofac Surg 25:980–982CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hellem S, Olofsson J (1988) Titanium-coated hollow screw and reconstruction plate system (THORP) in mandibular reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 16:173–183CrossRefPubMed Hellem S, Olofsson J (1988) Titanium-coated hollow screw and reconstruction plate system (THORP) in mandibular reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 16:173–183CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Vuillemin T, Raveh J, Sutter F (1988) Mandibular reconstruction with the titanium hollow screw reconstruction plate (THORP) system: evaluation of 62 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:804–814CrossRefPubMed Vuillemin T, Raveh J, Sutter F (1988) Mandibular reconstruction with the titanium hollow screw reconstruction plate (THORP) system: evaluation of 62 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:804–814CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wilde F, Cornelius C-P, Mascha F, Heufelder M, Schramm A (2012) Computerassistierte Unterkieferrekonstruktion unter Verwendung CAD/CAM gefertigter patientenspezifischer Unterkieferrekonstruktionsplatten. Eine Kadavermachbarkeitsstudie. Poster presentation, 62. Congress of the German Society of Oral-Maxillo-Facial-Surgery (DGMKG e.V.), 31 May–2 June 2012, Freiburg i. Brsg, Germany Wilde F, Cornelius C-P, Mascha F, Heufelder M, Schramm A (2012) Computerassistierte Unterkieferrekonstruktion unter Verwendung CAD/CAM gefertigter patientenspezifischer Unterkieferrekonstruktionsplatten. Eine Kadavermachbarkeitsstudie. Poster presentation, 62. Congress of the German Society of Oral-Maxillo-Facial-Surgery (DGMKG e.V.), 31 May–2 June 2012, Freiburg i. Brsg, Germany
17.
go back to reference Wilde F, Cornelius C-P, Schramm A (2013) Computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with CAD/CAM-fabricated patient-specific reconstruction plates: a cadaver feasibility study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(Suppl 1):87–88 Wilde F, Cornelius C-P, Schramm A (2013) Computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with CAD/CAM-fabricated patient-specific reconstruction plates: a cadaver feasibility study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(Suppl 1):87–88
18.
go back to reference Modabber A, Ayoub N, Möhlhenrich SC, Goloborodko E, Sönmez TT, Ghassemi M, Loberg C, Lethaus B, Ghassemi A, Hölzle F (2014) The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. Med Devices (Auckl) 7:211–217CrossRef Modabber A, Ayoub N, Möhlhenrich SC, Goloborodko E, Sönmez TT, Ghassemi M, Loberg C, Lethaus B, Ghassemi A, Hölzle F (2014) The accuracy of computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction with vascularized bone flaps: iliac crest bone flap versus osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. Med Devices (Auckl) 7:211–217CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Crawford S (1999) Condylar axis position, as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction. Angle Orthod 69:103–115PubMed Crawford S (1999) Condylar axis position, as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction. Angle Orthod 69:103–115PubMed
20.
go back to reference Leonard M (1985) Maintenance of condylar position after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofax Surg 43:391–392CrossRef Leonard M (1985) Maintenance of condylar position after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofax Surg 43:391–392CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Leonard M (1976) Preventing rotation of the proximal fragment in the sagittal ramus split operation. J Oral Surg 34:942–942PubMed Leonard M (1976) Preventing rotation of the proximal fragment in the sagittal ramus split operation. J Oral Surg 34:942–942PubMed
22.
go back to reference Seruya M, Fisher M, Rodriguez ED (2013) Computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula flap technique for craniofacial reconstruction: an outcomes comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1219–1228CrossRefPubMed Seruya M, Fisher M, Rodriguez ED (2013) Computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula flap technique for craniofacial reconstruction: an outcomes comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1219–1228CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Martola M, Lindqvist C, Hänninen H, Al-Sukhun J (2007) Fracture of titanium plates used for mandibular reconstruction following ablative tumor surgery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 80:345–352CrossRefPubMed Martola M, Lindqvist C, Hänninen H, Al-Sukhun J (2007) Fracture of titanium plates used for mandibular reconstruction following ablative tumor surgery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 80:345–352CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction
Authors
Frank Wilde
Henning Hanken
Florian Probst
Alexander Schramm
Max Heiland
Carl-Peter Cornelius
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Electronic ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1193-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 12/2015 Go to the issue