Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Urban Health
Published in: Journal of Urban Health 2/2007

01-03-2007

Exploring Associations between Physical Activity and Perceived and Objective Measures of the Built Environment

Authors: Aileen P. McGinn, Kelly R. Evenson, Amy H. Herring, Sara L. Huston, Daniel A. Rodriguez

Published in: Journal of Urban Health | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

The built environment may be responsible for making nonmotorized transportation inconvenient, resulting in declines in physical activity. However, few studies have assessed both the perceived and objectively measured environment in association with physical activity outcomes. The purpose of this study was to describe the associations between perceptions and objective measures of the built environment and their associations with leisure, walking, and transportation activity. Perception of the environment was assessed from responses to 1,270 telephone surveys conducted in Forsyth County, NC and Jackson, MS from January to July 2003. Participants were asked if high-speed cars, heavy traffic, and lack of crosswalks or sidewalks were problems in their neighborhood or barriers to physical activity. They were also asked if there are places to walk to instead of driving in their neighborhood. Speed, volume, and street connectivity were assessed using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for both study areas. Locations of crashes were measured using GIS for the NC study area as well. Objective and perceived measures of the built environment were in poor agreement as calculated by kappa coefficients. Few associations were found between any of the physical activity outcomes and perception of speed, volume, or presence of sidewalks as problems in the neighborhood or as barriers to physical activity in regression analyses. Associations between perceptions of having places to walk to and presence of crosswalks differed between study sites. Several associations were found between objective measures of traffic volume, traffic speed, and crashes with leisure, walking, and transportation activity in Forsyth County, NC; however, in Jackson, MS, only traffic volume was associated with any of the physical activity outcomes. When both objective and perceived measures of the built environment were combined into the same model, we observed independent associations with physical activity; thus, we feel that evaluating both objective and perceived measures of the built environment may be necessary when examining the relationship between the built environment and physical activity.
Literature
1.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Physical activity and health: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.
2.
Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995;273(5):402–407.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Breslow L. Social ecological strategies for promoting healthy lifestyles. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10(4):253–257.PubMed
4.
Hill JO, Goldberg JP, Pate RR, Peters JC. Proceedings of the partnership to promote healthy eating and active living summit. Nutr Rev. March 2001;59(3):S4–S6.CrossRef
5.
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Stecker A, Glanz K. An ecologic perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–377.PubMed
6.
von Korff M, Koepsell T, Curry S, Diehr P. Multi-level analysis in epidemiologic research on health behaviors and outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135(10):1077–1082.
7.
Green L, McAlister A. Macro-intervention to support health behavior: some theoretical perspectives and practical reflections. Health Educ. 1984;11:322–339.
8.
Green L, Richard L. The need to combine health education and health promotion: the case of cardiovascular disease prevention. Promot Educ. 1993;1:11–17.
9.
Schmid TL, Pratt M, Howze E. Policy as intervention: environmental and policy approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1207–1211.PubMed
10.
Handy SL, Boarnet MG, Ewing R, Killingsworth R. How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23(2S):64–73.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Frumkin H. Urban sprawl and public health. Public Health Rep. May–June 2002;117:201–217.PubMed
12.
Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med. 2003;25(2):80–91.PubMedCrossRef
13.
1000 Friends of Oregon. The pedestrian environment (Vol 4a). Portland, OR: Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas Inc.; 1993.
14.
Greenwald M, Boarnet M. The built environment as a determinant of walking behavior: analyzing non-work pedestrian travel in Portland, Oregon. Transp Res Rec. 2002;1780:33–42.
15.
Cervero R, Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp Res Part D Trans Environ. 1997;2(3):199–219.CrossRef
16.
Cervero R, Duncan M. Walking, bicycling and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(9):1478–1483.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Krizek KJ. Residential relocation and changes in urban travel: does neighborhood-scale urban form matter? J Am Plan Assoc. 2003;69(3):265–282.
18.
Song Y. Comparing urban growth in U.S. metropolitan areas: a spatial analysis of urban form. Int Reg Sci Rev. 2005;28(2):239–265.CrossRef
19.
Song Y, Knaap G-J. Measuring urban form: Is Portland winning the war on sprawl. J Am Plan Assoc. 2004;70(2):210–225.
20.
Frank LD, Schmid TL, Sallis JF, Chapman J, Saelens BE. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2 Suppl 2):117–125.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Ross C, Dunning A. Land Use Transportation Interaction: An Examination of the 1995 NPTS Data. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; 1997.
22.
Frank L, Pivo G. Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: Single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transp Res Rec. 1994;1466:44–52.
23.
Eyler AA, Brownson RC, Bacak SJ, Housemann R. The epidemiology of walking for physical activity in the United States. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2003;35(9):1529–1536.CrossRef
24.
King AC, Castro C, Wilcox S, et al. Personal and environmental factors associated with physical inactivity among different racial/ethnic groups of U.S. middle- and older-aged women. Health Psychol. 2000;19(4):354–364.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Wilcox S, Castro C, King AC, Housemann R, Brownson RC. Determinants of leisure time physical activity in rural compared with urban older and ethnically diverse women in the United States. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54(9):667–672.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Huston S, Evenson KR, Bors P, Gizlice Z. Neighborhood environment, access to places for physical activity, and leisure time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population. Am J Health Promot. 2003;18(1):58–69.PubMed
27.
Kirtland KA, Porter DE, Addy CL, et al. Environmental measures of physical activity supports: Perception versus reality. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(4):323–331.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Troped PJ, Saunders RP, Pate RR, et al. Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail. Prev Med. 2001;32:191–200.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1793–1812.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to supportive physical environment. Prev Med. 2002;35(6):601–611.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System User’s Guide. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1998.
32.
33.
Evenson KR, McGinn AP. Test–retest reliability of a questionnaire to assess physical environmental factors pertaining to physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005;2:7–13.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Evenson KR, McGinn AP. Test–retest reliability of adult surveillance measures of physical activity and inactivity. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(5):470–478.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Pikora T, Giles-Corti B, Bull F, Jamrozik K, Donovan R. Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:1693–1703.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of physical activity, including lifestyle activities among adults—United States, 2000–2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(32):764–769.
37.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity trends—United States, 1990–1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50(9):166–169.
38.
Strath S, Bassett Jr. D, Ham S, Swartz A. Assessment of physical activity by telephone interview versus objective monitoring. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2003;35(Suppl 5):S114.CrossRef
39.
Baecke JAH, Burema J, Frijters JER. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;36(5):936–942.PubMed
40.
41.
Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc. TigerLine Road Network. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc. Available at: www.​esri.​com. Accessed July 2003.
42.
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Spatial Analyst Extension for Arcview 3.x (computer program). Version. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.; 1998.
43.
Dill J. Measuring Network Connectivity for Bicycling and Walking. Washington DC: 83rd annual meeting of the transportation research board; 2004.
44.
45.
46.
47.
Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc. ArcGIS (computer program). Version 8.1. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc.; 2000.
48.
SAS Institute Inc. SAS [computer program]. Version 8.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2002.
49.
50.
51.
Kaiser H. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:141–151.CrossRef
52.
Hatcher L, Stepanski E. A Step-by-step Approach to Using the SAS System for Univariate and Multivariate Statistics, 1st edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 1994.
53.
Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Research Triangle Institute. Sudaan Software for the Statistical Analysis of Correlated Data (computer program). Version 8.0.2. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute; 2003.
55.
Little RJ, Lewitzky S, Heeringa S, Lepkowski J, Kessler RC. Assessment of weighting methodology for the National Co-morbidity Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146(5):439–449.PubMed
56.
Hoehner CM, Brennan Ramirez LK, Elliott MB, Handy SL, Brownson RC. Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2Suppl 2):105–116.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Ball K, Bauman A, Leslie E, Owen N. Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Prev Med. 2001;33:434–440.PubMedCrossRef
58.
King WC, Brach JS, Belle S, et al. The relationship between convenience of destinations and walking levels in older women. Am J Health Promot. 2003;18(1):74–82.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Exploring Associations between Physical Activity and Perceived and Objective Measures of the Built Environment
Authors
Aileen P. McGinn
Kelly R. Evenson
Amy H. Herring
Sara L. Huston
Daniel A. Rodriguez
Publication date
01-03-2007
Published in
Journal of Urban Health / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Electronic ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9136-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Journal of Urban Health 2/2007 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Patterns of Nonfatal Heroin Overdose Over a 3-Year Period: Findings From the Australian Treatment Outcome Study

OriginalPaper

Depressive Symptoms among Firefighters and Related Factors after the Response to Hurricane Katrina

OriginalPaper

Observed Patterns of Illicit Opiate Overdose Deaths in Chicago, 1999–2003

OriginalPaper

The Puerto Rico–New York Airbridge for Drug Users: Description and Relationship to HIV Risk Behaviors

OriginalPaper

The Sociobiologic Integrative Model (SBIM): Enhancing the Integration of Sociobehavioral, Environmental, and Biomolecular Knowledge in Urban Health and Disparities Research

OriginalPaper

Shooting Gallery Operation in the Context of Establishing a Medically Supervised Injecting Center: Sydney, Australia