Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Urban Health 1/2006

Open Access 01-11-2006

Respondent-Driven Sampling in a Study of Drug Users in New York City: Notes from the Field

Authors: Courtney McKnight, Don Des Jarlais, Heidi Bramson, Lisa Tower, Abu S. Abdul-Quader, Chris Nemeth, Douglas Heckathorn

Published in: Journal of Urban Health | Special Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Beth Israel Medical Center (BIMC), in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH), used respondent-driven sampling (RDS) in a study of HIV seroprevalence among drug users in New York City in 2004. We report here on operational issues with RDS including recruitment, coupon distribution, storefront operations, police and community relations, and the overall lessons we learned. Project staff recruited eight seeds from a syringe exchange in Lower Manhattan to serve as the initial study participants. Upon completion of the interview that lasted approximately 1 h and a blood draw, each seed was given three coupons to recruit three drug users into the study. Each of the subsequent eligible participants was also given three coupons to recruit three of their drug-using acquaintances. Eligible participants had to have: injected, smoked or snorted an illicit drug in the last 6 months (other than marijuana), aged 18 or older, adequate English language knowledge to permit informed consent and complete questionnaire. From April to July 2004, 618 drug users were interviewed, including 263 (43%) current injectors, 119 (19%) former injectors, and 236 (38%) never injectors. Four hundred sixty nine (76%) participants were men, 147 (24%) were women, and two (<1%) were transgender. By race/ethnicity, 285 (46%) were black, 218 (35%) Hispanic, 88 (14%) white, 23 (4%) mixed/not specified, and four (<1%) native American. Interviews were initially done on a drop-in basis but this system changed to appointments 1 month into the study due to the large volume of subjects coming in for interviews. Data collection was originally proposed to last for 1 year with a target recruitment of 500 drug users. Utilizing RDS, we were able to recruit and interview 118 more drug users than originally proposed in one quarter of the time. RDS was efficient with respect to time and economics (we did not have to hire an outreach worker) and effective in recruiting a diverse sample of drug users.
Footnotes
1
We had one instance of a person trying to re-enroll in the study. Even though the person tried to disguise himself with a hat and glasses, the screener recognized him and did not enroll him in the study.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Heckathorn D. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997;44:174–199.CrossRef Heckathorn D. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997;44:174–199.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Heckathorn D. Respondent driven sampling II. Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 2002;49:11–34.CrossRef Heckathorn D. Respondent driven sampling II. Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 2002;49:11–34.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Magnani R, Sabin K, Saidel T, Heckathorn D. Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations or HIV surveillance. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 2):S67–S72.PubMedCrossRef Magnani R, Sabin K, Saidel T, Heckathorn D. Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations or HIV surveillance. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 2):S67–S72.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Watters JK, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1989;36:416–430.CrossRef Watters JK, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1989;36:416–430.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Semaan S, Lauby J, Liebman J. Street and network sampling in evaluation studies of HIV risk-reduction interventions. AIDS Rev. 2002;4:213–223.PubMed Semaan S, Lauby J, Liebman J. Street and network sampling in evaluation studies of HIV risk-reduction interventions. AIDS Rev. 2002;4:213–223.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Salganik MJ, Heckathorn D. Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociol Method. 2004;34:193–239.CrossRef Salganik MJ, Heckathorn D. Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociol Method. 2004;34:193–239.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Des Jarlais DC, Diaz T, Perlis T, et al. Variability in the incidence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus infection among young injecting drug users in New York City. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(5):467–471.PubMedCrossRef Des Jarlais DC, Diaz T, Perlis T, et al. Variability in the incidence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus infection among young injecting drug users in New York City. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(5):467–471.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Respondent-Driven Sampling in a Study of Drug Users in New York City: Notes from the Field
Authors
Courtney McKnight
Don Des Jarlais
Heidi Bramson
Lisa Tower
Abu S. Abdul-Quader
Chris Nemeth
Douglas Heckathorn
Publication date
01-11-2006
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Urban Health / Issue Special Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Electronic ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9102-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2006

Journal of Urban Health 1/2006 Go to the issue