Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Urban Health 5/2006

01-09-2006

A Multilevel Analysis of Key Forms of Community- and Individual-Level Social Capital as Predictors of Self-Rated Health in the United States

Authors: Daniel Kim, Ichiro Kawachi

Published in: Journal of Urban Health | Issue 5/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Communities may be rich or poor in a variety of stocks of social capital. Studies that have investigated relations among these forms and their simultaneous and combined health effects are sparse. Using data on a sample of 24,835 adults (more than half of whom resided in core urban areas) nested within 40 U.S. communities from the Social Capital Benchmark Survey, correlational and factor analyses were applied to determine appropriate groupings among eight key social capital indicators (social trust, informal social interactions, formal group involvement, religious group involvement, giving and volunteering, diversity of friendship networks, electoral political participation, and non-electoral political participation) at each of the community and individual levels. Multilevel logistic regression models were estimated to analyze the associations between the grouped social capital forms and individual self-rated health. Adjusting the three identified community-level social capital groupings/scales for one another and community- and individual-level sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics, each of the odds ratios of fair/poor health associated with living in a community one standard deviation higher in the respective social capital form was modestly below one. Being high on all three (vs. none of the) scales was significantly associated with 18% lower odds of fair/poor health (odds ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval = 0.69–0.98). Adding individual-level social capital variables to the model attenuated two of the three community-level social capital associations, with a few of the former characteristics appearing to be moderately significantly protective of health. We further observed several significant interactions between community-level social capital and one's proximity to core urban areas, individual-level race/ethnicity, gender, and social capital. Overall, our results suggest primarily beneficial yet modest health effects of key summary forms of community social capital, and heterogeneity in some of these effects by urban context and population subgroup.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lin N. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001. Lin N. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
2.
go back to reference Harpham T, Grant E, Thomas E. Measuring social capital within health surveys: key issues. Health Policy Plan. 2002;17:106–111.PubMedCrossRef Harpham T, Grant E, Thomas E. Measuring social capital within health surveys: key issues. Health Policy Plan. 2002;17:106–111.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Putnam RD, Goss KA. Introduction. In: Putnam RD, ed. Democracies in Flux. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:3–19.CrossRef Putnam RD, Goss KA. Introduction. In: Putnam RD, ed. Democracies in Flux. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:3–19.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Putnam RD. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2000. Putnam RD. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2000.
5.
go back to reference Kawachi I, Kim D, Coutts A, Subramanian SV. Commentary: reconciling the three accounts of social capital. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:682–690.PubMedCrossRef Kawachi I, Kim D, Coutts A, Subramanian SV. Commentary: reconciling the three accounts of social capital. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:682–690.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kawachi I, Berkman LF. Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, eds. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:174–190. Kawachi I, Berkman LF. Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, eds. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:174–190.
7.
go back to reference Helliwell JF, Putnam RD. The social context of well-being. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;359:1435–1446.PubMedCrossRef Helliwell JF, Putnam RD. The social context of well-being. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;359:1435–1446.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kim D, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I. Bonding versus bridging social capital and their associations with self-rated health: a multilevel analysis of 40 U.S. communities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(2):116–122.PubMedCrossRef Kim D, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I. Bonding versus bridging social capital and their associations with self-rated health: a multilevel analysis of 40 U.S. communities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(2):116–122.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Subramanian SV, Kim DJ, Kawachi I. Social trust and self-rated health in U.S. communities: a multilevel analysis. J Urban Health. 2002;79:S21–S34.PubMed Subramanian SV, Kim DJ, Kawachi I. Social trust and self-rated health in U.S. communities: a multilevel analysis. J Urban Health. 2002;79:S21–S34.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Research TRCfPO. The Social Capital Benchmark Survey (Data Codebook). Storrs, Connecticut: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research; 2002. Research TRCfPO. The Social Capital Benchmark Survey (Data Codebook). Storrs, Connecticut: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research; 2002.
11.
go back to reference Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38:21–37.PubMedCrossRef Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38:21–37.PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, et al. A User's Guide to MLwiN, Version 2.1. Multilevel Models Project. London: University of London; 2000. Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, et al. A User's Guide to MLwiN, Version 2.1. Multilevel Models Project. London: University of London; 2000.
14.
go back to reference Goldstein H, Rasbash J. Improved approximations for multilevel models with binary responses. J R Stat Soc A. 1996;159:505–513.CrossRef Goldstein H, Rasbash J. Improved approximations for multilevel models with binary responses. J R Stat Soc A. 1996;159:505–513.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vlahov D, Galea S, Freudenberg N. The urban health “advantage”. J Urban Health. 2005;82:1–4.PubMed Vlahov D, Galea S, Freudenberg N. The urban health “advantage”. J Urban Health. 2005;82:1–4.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Portes A. Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Ann Rev Sociol. 1998;24:1–24.CrossRef Portes A. Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Ann Rev Sociol. 1998;24:1–24.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Burg MM, Seeman TE. Families and health: the negative side of social ties. Annals Behav Med. 1994;16:109–115. Burg MM, Seeman TE. Families and health: the negative side of social ties. Annals Behav Med. 1994;16:109–115.
18.
go back to reference Wamala SP, Agren G. Gender differences and health. In: Anderson N, Kawachi I, et al., eds. Encyclopedia of Health and Behavior. New York: Sage; 2004. Wamala SP, Agren G. Gender differences and health. In: Anderson N, Kawachi I, et al., eds. Encyclopedia of Health and Behavior. New York: Sage; 2004.
Metadata
Title
A Multilevel Analysis of Key Forms of Community- and Individual-Level Social Capital as Predictors of Self-Rated Health in the United States
Authors
Daniel Kim
Ichiro Kawachi
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Urban Health / Issue 5/2006
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Electronic ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9082-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2006

Journal of Urban Health 5/2006 Go to the issue