Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HSS Journal ® 3/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Normal Femorotibial Rotational Alignment and Implications for Total Knee Arthroplasty: an MRI Analysis

Authors: Gregory C. Wernecke, MBBS (Hons), Ian A. Harrris, FRACS (Orth), Bradley G. Seeto, FRACS (Orth), Darren B. Chen, FRACS (Orth), Samuel J. MacDessi, FRACS (Orth)

Published in: HSS Journal ® | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Rotational alignment of prosthetic components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important to successful outcomes. Component malrotation is a known cause of revision and understanding normal rotational alignment may help recreate normal joint kinematics. To date, no large MRI study assessing femorotibial rotational alignment in nonarthritic knees has been undertaken.

Questions/Purposes

Is Insall’s tibial axis a reliable rotational landmark against common femoral rotational axes in the nonarthritic patient population?

Methods

We reviewed 544 knee MRI scans performed for suspected soft tissue pathology and identified Insall’s tibial rotational axis as well as the femoral clinical trans-epicondylar axis (TEAc), femoral surgical trans-epicondylar axis (TEAs), posterior condylar articular axis (PCA), and a modified Eckhoff’s cylindrical axis. The perpendiculars of these axes were superimposed on Insall’s tibial axis, and the angular differences were measured.

Results

Insall’s axis was internally rotated to the TEAc by 1.4°, externally rotated to Eckhoff’s cylindrical axis by 1.8°, externally rotated to the TEAs by 2.7°, and externally rotated to the PCA by 3.5°. The mean deviation from 0° (optimal alignment for each femoral axis) was significantly greater for the PCA relative to all other femoral axis.

Conclusion

Insall’s axis is a reliable landmark for rotational positioning of the tibial component and may optimize femorotibial kinematics in fixed-bearing TKA.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(7): 857-862.CrossRefPubMed Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(7): 857-862.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Aglietti P, Sensi L, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A. Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 11: 2751-5.CrossRef Aglietti P, Sensi L, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A. Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 11: 2751-5.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, et al. Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 366: 155-63.CrossRefPubMed Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, et al. Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 366: 155-63.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C. Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 436: 172-76.CrossRefPubMed Akagi M, Mori S, Nishimura S, Nishimura A, Asano T, Hamanishi C. Variability of extraarticular tibial rotation references for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 436: 172-76.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 420: 213-219.CrossRefPubMed Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 420: 213-219.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Amaranath JE, Moopanar TR, Sorial RM. Defining distal femoral anatomy for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a magnetic resonance imaging-based study. ANZ J Surg. 2014. doi:10.1111/ans.12708. Amaranath JE, Moopanar TR, Sorial RM. Defining distal femoral anatomy for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a magnetic resonance imaging-based study. ANZ J Surg. 2014. doi:10.​1111/​ans.​12708.
7.
go back to reference Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 392: 46-55.CrossRefPubMed Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 392: 46-55.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bedard M, Vince KG, Redfern J, Collen SR. Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rela Res. 2011. Aug;469(8):2346–55 Bedard M, Vince KG, Redfern J, Collen SR. Internal rotation of the tibial component is frequent in stiff total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rela Res. 2011. Aug;469(8):2346–55
9.
go back to reference Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1998; 356: 144-53.CrossRef Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1998; 356: 144-53.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; 286: 40-7.PubMed Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; 286: 40-7.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Bindelglass DF. Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2001; 24(11): 1049-1052.PubMed Bindelglass DF. Rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2001; 24(11): 1049-1052.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bonnin MP, Saffarini M, Mercier PE, Laurent JR, Carrillon Y. Is the anterior tibial tuberosity a reliable rotational landmark for the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2011 Feb;26)2):260–7 Bonnin MP, Saffarini M, Mercier PE, Laurent JR, Carrillon Y. Is the anterior tibial tuberosity a reliable rotational landmark for the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2011 Feb;26)2):260–7
13.
go back to reference Eckhoff DG, Metzger RG, Vandewalle MV. Malrotation associated with implant alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 321: 28-31.PubMed Eckhoff DG, Metzger RG, Vandewalle MV. Malrotation associated with implant alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 321: 28-31.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(6 Suppl): 39-34.CrossRefPubMed Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(6 Suppl): 39-34.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hancock CW, Winston MJ, Bach JM, Davidson BS, Eckhoff DG. Cylindrical axis, not epicondyles, approximates perpendicular to knee axes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(7): 2278-83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hancock CW, Winston MJ, Bach JM, Davidson BS, Eckhoff DG. Cylindrical axis, not epicondyles, approximates perpendicular to knee axes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(7): 2278-83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2000; 82-B: 1196-1198.CrossRef Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2000; 82-B: 1196-1198.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Incavo SJ, Coughlin KM, Pappas C, Beynnon BD. Anatomic rotational relationships of the proximal tibia, distal femur, and patella: implications for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18(5): 643-8.CrossRefPubMed Incavo SJ, Coughlin KM, Pappas C, Beynnon BD. Anatomic rotational relationships of the proximal tibia, distal femur, and patella: implications for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18(5): 643-8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Incavo SJ, Wild JJ, Coughlin KM, Beynnon BD. Early revision for component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007. May;458:131–6 Incavo SJ, Wild JJ, Coughlin KM, Beynnon BD. Early revision for component malrotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007. May;458:131–6
19.
go back to reference Insall JN. Surgical technique and instrumentation in TKA. In:INsall JN, ed. Surgery of the Knee. New York NY: Churchill Livingstone: 1993;739–893 Insall JN. Surgical technique and instrumentation in TKA. In:INsall JN, ed. Surgery of the Knee. New York NY: Churchill Livingstone: 1993;739–893
20.
go back to reference KimYH PJW, Kim JS, Park SD. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2014; 38(2): 379-85.CrossRef KimYH PJW, Kim JS, Park SD. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2014; 38(2): 379-85.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, et al. Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2000; 82-B: 1199-1200.CrossRef Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, et al. Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2000; 82-B: 1199-1200.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Park IS, Ong A, Nam CH, et al. Transepicondylr axes for femoral component rotation might produce flexion asymmetry during total knee arthroplasty in knees with proximal tibia vara. Knee. 2014; 21(2): 369-73.CrossRefPubMed Park IS, Ong A, Nam CH, et al. Transepicondylr axes for femoral component rotation might produce flexion asymmetry during total knee arthroplasty in knees with proximal tibia vara. Knee. 2014; 21(2): 369-73.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Paternostre F, Schwab PE, Thienpont E. The combined Whiteside’s and posterior condylar line as a reliable reference to describe axial distal femoral anantomy in patient-specific instrument planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-2836-5. Paternostre F, Schwab PE, Thienpont E. The combined Whiteside’s and posterior condylar line as a reliable reference to describe axial distal femoral anantomy in patient-specific instrument planning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-014-2836-5.
25.
go back to reference Romero J, Stahelin T, Binkert C, Pfirrmann C, Hodler J, Kessler O. The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(2): 235-40.CrossRefPubMed Romero J, Stahelin T, Binkert C, Pfirrmann C, Hodler J, Kessler O. The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(2): 235-40.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Uehara K, Kadoya Y, Kobyashi A, Ohashi H, Yamona Y. Bone anatomy and rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 402: 196-201.CrossRefPubMed Uehara K, Kadoya Y, Kobyashi A, Ohashi H, Yamona Y. Bone anatomy and rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 402: 196-201.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Wernecke GC, Harris IA, Houang M, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ. Comparison of tibial bone coverage of 6 knee prostheses: a magnetic resonance imaging study with controlled rotation. J Orthop Surg. 2012; 20(2): 143-7. Wernecke GC, Harris IA, Houang M, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ. Comparison of tibial bone coverage of 6 knee prostheses: a magnetic resonance imaging study with controlled rotation. J Orthop Surg. 2012; 20(2): 143-7.
Metadata
Title
Normal Femorotibial Rotational Alignment and Implications for Total Knee Arthroplasty: an MRI Analysis
Authors
Gregory C. Wernecke, MBBS (Hons)
Ian A. Harrris, FRACS (Orth)
Bradley G. Seeto, FRACS (Orth)
Darren B. Chen, FRACS (Orth)
Samuel J. MacDessi, FRACS (Orth)
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
HSS Journal ® / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1556-3316
Electronic ISSN: 1556-3324
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-016-9491-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

HSS Journal ® 3/2016 Go to the issue