Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Sport Sciences for Health 2/2020

01-06-2020 | Original Article

Anaerobic capacity estimated by a single effort distinguishes training status in male cyclists

Authors: Yago Medeiros Dutra, Rodrigo Araujo Bonetti de Poli, Willian Eiji Miyagi, Júlia Bombini Faustini, Alessandro Moura Zagatto

Published in: Sport Sciences for Health | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Measurement of anaerobic capacity through estimating the glycolytic and phosphagen energy pathways (AC[La]+PCr) has been considered a time-efficient, valid, and reproducible method, however, the sensitivity of this protocol to discriminate training levels in cyclists has not yet been elucidated.

Aims

The main purpose of the present investigation was to verify the sensitivity of AC[La]+PCr to distinguish the anaerobic capacity of male cyclists with different training status.

Methods

Fifty-five healthy men performed a maximum incremental test to determine maximal oxygen uptake \((\dot{\text{V}}{{\text{O}}}_{\text{2max}})\) and the intensity associated with it \((i\dot{\text{V}}{{\text{O}}}_{\text{2max}})\), and a constant-load supramaximal-intensity cycling exercise at 115% of the i\(\dot{\text{V}}{{\text{O}}}_{\text{2max}}\) to determine anaerobic capacity through AC[La]+PCr.

Results

According to performance in the incremental test, 20 subjects were classified as untrained (\(\dot{\text{V}}{{\text{O}}}_{\text{2max}}\) = 2.92 ± 0.28 L min−1), 25 classified as recreationally trained (\(\dot{\text{V}}{{\text{O}}}_{\text{2max}}\)3.78 ± 0.19 L min−1), and 10 classified as trained (\(\dot{\text{V}}{{\text{O}}}_{\text{2max}}\) = 4.36 ± 0.41 L min−1). Expressed in absolute values, the trained group presented higher anaerobic capacity measured through AC[La]+PCr [4.82 ± 1.07 L (4.05–5.59 L)] than the recreationally trained [4.13 ± 0.64 L (3.87–4.4 L)] (p = 0.027) and untrained groups [3.22 ± 0.42 L (3.02–3.42 L)] (p = 0.001). In addition, the recreationally trained group also demonstrated significantly higher anaerobic capacity values than the untrained group (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The AC[La]+PCr was sensitive to discriminate the anaerobic capacity between trained, recreationally trained, and untrained male cyclists.
Literature
17.
21.
go back to reference Thibault V, Guillaume M, Berthelot G, ElHelouSchaal NK, Quinquis L et al (2010) Women and men in sport performance: the gender gap has not evolved since 1983. J Sport Sci Med 9:214–223 Thibault V, Guillaume M, Berthelot G, ElHelouSchaal NK, Quinquis L et al (2010) Women and men in sport performance: the gender gap has not evolved since 1983. J Sport Sci Med 9:214–223
Metadata
Title
Anaerobic capacity estimated by a single effort distinguishes training status in male cyclists
Authors
Yago Medeiros Dutra
Rodrigo Araujo Bonetti de Poli
Willian Eiji Miyagi
Júlia Bombini Faustini
Alessandro Moura Zagatto
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Sport Sciences for Health / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1824-7490
Electronic ISSN: 1825-1234
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-020-00634-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Sport Sciences for Health 2/2020 Go to the issue