Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Sleep and Breathing 1/2015

01-03-2015 | Original Article

Process and outcome for international reliability in sleep scoring

Authors: Xiaozhe Zhang, Xiaosong Dong, Jan W. Kantelhardt, Jing Li, Long Zhao, Carmen Garcia, Martin Glos, Thomas Penzel, Fang Han

Published in: Sleep and Breathing | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability in scoring sleep stages in two sleep labs in Berlin Germany and Beijing China.

Methods

The subjects consist of polysomnography (PSGs) from 15 subjects in a German sleep laboratory, with 7 mild to moderate sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) patients and 8 healthy controls, and PSGs from 15 narcolepsy patients in a Chinese sleep laboratory. Five experienced technologists including two Chinese and three Germans without common training scored the PSGs following the 2007 AASM manual except the EEG signals included only two EEG leads (C3/A2 and C4/A1). Differences in inter-scorer agreement were analyzed based on epoch-by-epoch comparison by means of Cohen’s κ, and quantitative sleep parameters by means of intra-class correlation coefficients.

Results

Inter-laboratory epoch-by-epoch agreement comparison between scorers from the two countries yielded a moderate agreement with a mean κ value of 0.57 for controls, 0.58 for SAHS, and 0.54 for narcolepsy. When compared with controls, the inter-scoring agreement is higher for wake and N3 stage scoring in SAHS and N1 and N3 scoring in narcolepsy (p < 0.05). The only sleep stage with lower scoring agreement in both SAHS (κ 0.69 vs. 0.79, p = 0.034) and narcolepsy (0.66 vs 0.79, p = 0.022) was stage REM. Inter-laboratory comparisons showed that the most common combinations of deviating scorings were N1 and N2, N2 and N3, and N1 and wake. A 6.5 % deviating scoring rate of wake and REM and a 13.4 % deviating scoring rate of N1 and REM indicated that inter-laboratory scoring in narcolepsy was about twice as in SAHS and controls confused. This was further confirmed by agreement analysis of quantitative parameters using intra-class correlation coefficients ICC(2,1) indicating REM sleep scoring agreement was lower in narcolepsy than in controls (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Low REM stage scoring agreement exists for narcoleptics and SAHS, indicating the necessity to study sleep stage scoring agreement for a specific sleep disorder. Intensive training is needed for the scoring of sleep in international multiple center studies to improve the scoring agreement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rechtschaffen A, Kales A (1968) A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects. US Department of health, Education and Welfare Public Health Service—NIH/NIND, Washington, DC Rechtschaffen A, Kales A (1968) A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects. US Department of health, Education and Welfare Public Health Service—NIH/NIND, Washington, DC
2.
go back to reference Iber C, Ancoli-Israel S, Chesson A, Quan S, for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2007) The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: rules, terminology and technical specifications. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Westchester Iber C, Ancoli-Israel S, Chesson A, Quan S, for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2007) The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: rules, terminology and technical specifications. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Westchester
3.
go back to reference Berry RB, Brooks R, Gamaldo CE, Harding SM, Marcus CL, Vaughn BV, for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2012) The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: rules, terminology and technical specifications, version 2.0. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Darien, www.aasmnet.org Berry RB, Brooks R, Gamaldo CE, Harding SM, Marcus CL, Vaughn BV, for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2012) The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: rules, terminology and technical specifications, version 2.0. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Darien, www.aasmnet.org
4.
go back to reference Penzel T, Zhang X, Fietze I (2013) Inter-scorer reliability between sleep centers can teach us what to improve in the scoring rules. J Clin Sleep Med 9:89–91PubMedCentralPubMed Penzel T, Zhang X, Fietze I (2013) Inter-scorer reliability between sleep centers can teach us what to improve in the scoring rules. J Clin Sleep Med 9:89–91PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rosenberg RS, Van Hout S (2013) The American Academy of Sleep Medicine interscorer reliability program: sleep stage scoring. J Clin Sleep Med 9:81–87PubMedCentralPubMed Rosenberg RS, Van Hout S (2013) The American Academy of Sleep Medicine interscorer reliability program: sleep stage scoring. J Clin Sleep Med 9:81–87PubMedCentralPubMed
6.
go back to reference Danker-Hopfe H, Anderer P, Zeitlhofer J et al (2009) Interrater reliability for sleep scoring according to the Rechtschaffen & Kales and the new AASM standard. J Sleep Res 18:74–84CrossRefPubMed Danker-Hopfe H, Anderer P, Zeitlhofer J et al (2009) Interrater reliability for sleep scoring according to the Rechtschaffen & Kales and the new AASM standard. J Sleep Res 18:74–84CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ruehland WR, O’Donoghue FJ, Pierce RJ et al (2011) The 2007 AASM recommendations for EEG electrode placement in polysomnography: impact on sleep and cortical arousal scoring. Sleep 34:73–81PubMedCentralPubMed Ruehland WR, O’Donoghue FJ, Pierce RJ et al (2011) The 2007 AASM recommendations for EEG electrode placement in polysomnography: impact on sleep and cortical arousal scoring. Sleep 34:73–81PubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Norman RG, Pal I, Stewart C et al (2000) Interobserver agreement among sleep scorers from different centers in a large dataset. Sleep 23:901–908PubMed Norman RG, Pal I, Stewart C et al (2000) Interobserver agreement among sleep scorers from different centers in a large dataset. Sleep 23:901–908PubMed
9.
go back to reference Whitney CW, Gottlieb DJ, Redline S et al (1998) Reliability of scoring respiratory disturbance indices and sleep staging. Sleep 21:749–757PubMed Whitney CW, Gottlieb DJ, Redline S et al (1998) Reliability of scoring respiratory disturbance indices and sleep staging. Sleep 21:749–757PubMed
10.
go back to reference Danker-Hopfe H, Kunz D, Gruber G et al (2004) Interrater reliability between scorers from eight European sleep laboratories in subjects with different sleep disorders. J Sleep Res 13:63–69CrossRefPubMed Danker-Hopfe H, Kunz D, Gruber G et al (2004) Interrater reliability between scorers from eight European sleep laboratories in subjects with different sleep disorders. J Sleep Res 13:63–69CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Magalang UJ, Chen NH, Cistulli PA et al (2013) Agreement in the scoring of respiratory events and sleep among international sleep centers. Sleep 36:591–596PubMedCentralPubMed Magalang UJ, Chen NH, Cistulli PA et al (2013) Agreement in the scoring of respiratory events and sleep among international sleep centers. Sleep 36:591–596PubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2005) International classification of sleep disorders: diagnostic and coding manual, 2nd edn. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Westchester American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2005) International classification of sleep disorders: diagnostic and coding manual, 2nd edn. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Westchester
13.
14.
go back to reference Chen L, Ho CK, Lam VK et al (2008) Interrater and intrarater reliability in multiple sleep latency test. J Clin Neurophysiol 25:218–221CrossRefPubMed Chen L, Ho CK, Lam VK et al (2008) Interrater and intrarater reliability in multiple sleep latency test. J Clin Neurophysiol 25:218–221CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Munro BH (2005) Statistical methods for health care research, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 248–249 Munro BH (2005) Statistical methods for health care research, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 248–249
Metadata
Title
Process and outcome for international reliability in sleep scoring
Authors
Xiaozhe Zhang
Xiaosong Dong
Jan W. Kantelhardt
Jing Li
Long Zhao
Carmen Garcia
Martin Glos
Thomas Penzel
Fang Han
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Sleep and Breathing / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1520-9512
Electronic ISSN: 1522-1709
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-014-0990-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Sleep and Breathing 1/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.