Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Nephrectomy | Urology - Original Paper

Is there a benefit to additional neuroaxial anesthesia in open nephrectomy? A prospective NSQIP propensity score analysis

Authors: Amr Mahran, Kirtishri Mishra, Danly Omil-Lima, Bissan Abboud, Michael Wang, Jason Jankowski, Robert Abouassaly, Lee Ponsky, Irma Lengu, Laura Bukavina

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Neuroaxial (i.e., spinal, regional, epidural) anesthesia has been shown to be associated with reduced readmission rate, decreased hospital stay, and decreased overall complication rate in orthopedic and gynecologic surgery. Our aim was to identify differences in intra- and postoperative complications, length of stay and readmission rates in open nephrectomy patients managed with neuroaxial anesthesia.

Materials and methods

Utilizing National Surgical Quality Inpatient Program (NSQIP) database, we identified patients who have undergone an open nephrectomy between 2014 and 2017. Patients were further subdivided based on anesthesia modality. We used the propensity score-matching (PSM) method to adjust for baseline differences among patients who received general anesthesia alone and those with additional neuroaxial anesthesia. Using step-wise multivariable logistic regression, we identified preoperative and intraoperative predictors associated with 30-day procedure-related readmission, complications, and postoperative length of stay.

Results

Out of 3,633 patients identified, 2346 patients met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. There was no difference in baseline characteristics after propensity score matching between general and additional neuroaxial anesthesia. Postoperative outcomes including: procedure-related readmission, rate of reoperation, operative time, all complications were similar between the groups. Adjuvant neuroaxial anesthesia group did experience a prolonged postoperative hospital stay that was statistically significant as compared to patients with general anesthesia alone [5.3 (3.5) days vs 4.8 (2.9) days, p = 0.007].
Compared to GA alone after multivariable logistic regression, neuroaxial anesthesia was not statistically significant for readmission (p = 0.909), any complication (p = 0.505), but did showed increased odds ratio of prolonged postoperative stay [aOR 1.107, 95% CI 1.042–1.176, p = 0.001] after adjusting for multiple factors.

Conclusion

Using 2014–2017 NSQIP database, we were able to demonstrate no additional reduction in complication or readmission rate in patients with neuroaxial anesthesia as compared to general anesthesia alone. Furthermore, patients who did receive neuroaxial anesthesia experienced a longer postoperative course.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Turan A et al (2019) Association of neuraxial anesthesia with postoperative venous thromboembolism after noncardiac surgery: a propensity-matched analysis of ACS-NSQIP database. Anesth Analg 128(3):494–501CrossRefPubMed Turan A et al (2019) Association of neuraxial anesthesia with postoperative venous thromboembolism after noncardiac surgery: a propensity-matched analysis of ACS-NSQIP database. Anesth Analg 128(3):494–501CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jaitly VK, Kumar C (2009) Continuous spinal anaesthesia for laparotomy. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 20:60–64CrossRef Jaitly VK, Kumar C (2009) Continuous spinal anaesthesia for laparotomy. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 20:60–64CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Amin SM, Sadek S (2016) Continuous spinal anesthesia for elderly patients with cardiomyopathy undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. Egypt J Anaesth 32:535–540CrossRef Amin SM, Sadek S (2016) Continuous spinal anesthesia for elderly patients with cardiomyopathy undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. Egypt J Anaesth 32:535–540CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gülçin Ö, Mensure K, Gonca T et al (2006) Original continuous spinal anaesthesia and analgesia in high-risk patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Indian J Surg 68:73–79 Gülçin Ö, Mensure K, Gonca T et al (2006) Original continuous spinal anaesthesia and analgesia in high-risk patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Indian J Surg 68:73–79
5.
go back to reference Michaloudis D et al (2000) Continuous spinal anaesthesia/analgesia for the perioperative management of high-risk patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 17(4):239–247CrossRefPubMed Michaloudis D et al (2000) Continuous spinal anaesthesia/analgesia for the perioperative management of high-risk patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 17(4):239–247CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Parthasarathy S, Ravishankar M (2011) Continuous spinal anesthesia with epidural catheters: an experience in the periphery. Anesth Essays Res 5(2):187–189CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Parthasarathy S, Ravishankar M (2011) Continuous spinal anesthesia with epidural catheters: an experience in the periphery. Anesth Essays Res 5(2):187–189CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Desai V, Chan PH, Prentice HA, Zohman GL, Diekmann GR, Maletis GB (2018) Is anesthesia technique associated with a higher risk of mortality or complications within 90 days of surgery for geriatric patients with hip fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 476:1178–1188CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Desai V, Chan PH, Prentice HA, Zohman GL, Diekmann GR, Maletis GB (2018) Is anesthesia technique associated with a higher risk of mortality or complications within 90 days of surgery for geriatric patients with hip fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 476:1178–1188CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Poeran J et al (2015) Anesthesia type and perioperative outcome: open colectomies in the United States. J Surg Res 193(2):684–692CrossRefPubMed Poeran J et al (2015) Anesthesia type and perioperative outcome: open colectomies in the United States. J Surg Res 193(2):684–692CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Özbek U et al (2015) Patient safety and comparative effectiveness of anesthetic technique in open lung resections. Chest 148(3):722–730CrossRefPubMed Özbek U et al (2015) Patient safety and comparative effectiveness of anesthetic technique in open lung resections. Chest 148(3):722–730CrossRefPubMed
10.
13.
go back to reference Plante K et al (2017) Treatment trends, determinants, and survival of partial and radical nephrectomy for stage I renal cell carcinoma: results from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004–2013. Int Urol Nephrol 49(8):1375–1381CrossRefPubMed Plante K et al (2017) Treatment trends, determinants, and survival of partial and radical nephrectomy for stage I renal cell carcinoma: results from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004–2013. Int Urol Nephrol 49(8):1375–1381CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Helwani MA et al (2015) Effects of regional versus general anesthesia on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97(3):186–193CrossRef Helwani MA et al (2015) Effects of regional versus general anesthesia on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97(3):186–193CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chu CC et al (2015) Propensity score-matched comparison of postoperative adverse outcomes between geriatric patients given a general or a neuraxial anesthetic for hip surgery: a population-based study. Anesthesiology 123(1):136–147CrossRefPubMed Chu CC et al (2015) Propensity score-matched comparison of postoperative adverse outcomes between geriatric patients given a general or a neuraxial anesthetic for hip surgery: a population-based study. Anesthesiology 123(1):136–147CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wongyingsinn M et al (2011) Intravenous lidocaine versus thoracic epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an enhanced recovery program. Reg Anesth Pain Med 36(3):241–248CrossRefPubMed Wongyingsinn M et al (2011) Intravenous lidocaine versus thoracic epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an enhanced recovery program. Reg Anesth Pain Med 36(3):241–248CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wongyingsinn M et al (2012) Spinal analgesia for laparoscopic colonic resection using an enhanced recovery after surgery programme: better analgesia, but no benefits on postoperative recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 108(5):850–856CrossRefPubMed Wongyingsinn M et al (2012) Spinal analgesia for laparoscopic colonic resection using an enhanced recovery after surgery programme: better analgesia, but no benefits on postoperative recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 108(5):850–856CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cummings KC et al (2018) Epidural compared with non-epidural analgesia and cardiopulmonary complications after colectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 20,880 patients using a national quality database. J Clin Anesth 47:12–18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cummings KC et al (2018) Epidural compared with non-epidural analgesia and cardiopulmonary complications after colectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 20,880 patients using a national quality database. J Clin Anesth 47:12–18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Lawson EH et al (2015) Comparison between clinical registry and medicare claims data on the classification of hospital quality of surgical care. Ann Surg 261(2):290–296CrossRefPubMed Lawson EH et al (2015) Comparison between clinical registry and medicare claims data on the classification of hospital quality of surgical care. Ann Surg 261(2):290–296CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Weingarten TN et al (2014) Hospitalization for partial nephrectomy was not associated with intrathecal opioid analgesia: retrospective analysis. Saudi J Anaesth 8(4):517–522CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weingarten TN et al (2014) Hospitalization for partial nephrectomy was not associated with intrathecal opioid analgesia: retrospective analysis. Saudi J Anaesth 8(4):517–522CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Edwards MS et al (2011) Results of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with general, regional, and local/monitored anesthesia care in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Vasc Surg 54(5):1273–1282CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Edwards MS et al (2011) Results of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with general, regional, and local/monitored anesthesia care in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Vasc Surg 54(5):1273–1282CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Neuman MD et al (2012) Comparative effectiveness of regional versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Anesthesiology 117(1):72–92CrossRefPubMed Neuman MD et al (2012) Comparative effectiveness of regional versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Anesthesiology 117(1):72–92CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Thurm M et al (2017) Spinal analgesia improves surgical outcome after open nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Urol 51(4):277–281CrossRefPubMed Thurm M et al (2017) Spinal analgesia improves surgical outcome after open nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Urol 51(4):277–281CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Babazade R et al (2019) The cost-effectiveness of epidural, patient-controlled intravenous opioid analgesia, or transversus abdominis plane infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain management. J Clin Anesth 53:56–63CrossRefPubMed Babazade R et al (2019) The cost-effectiveness of epidural, patient-controlled intravenous opioid analgesia, or transversus abdominis plane infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative pain management. J Clin Anesth 53:56–63CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Pugely AJ et al (2013) Differences in short-term complications between spinal and general anesthesia for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95(3):193–199CrossRef Pugely AJ et al (2013) Differences in short-term complications between spinal and general anesthesia for primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95(3):193–199CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Santaguida PL et al (2008) Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Can J Surg 51(6):428–436PubMedPubMedCentral Santaguida PL et al (2008) Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Can J Surg 51(6):428–436PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Chen LH, Hedegaard H, Warner M (2014) Drug-poisoning deaths involving opioid analgesics: United States, 1999–2011. NCHS Data Brief 166:1–8 Chen LH, Hedegaard H, Warner M (2014) Drug-poisoning deaths involving opioid analgesics: United States, 1999–2011. NCHS Data Brief 166:1–8
29.
31.
go back to reference Shiloach M, Frencher S, Steeger JE Jr (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210:6–16CrossRefPubMed Shiloach M, Frencher S, Steeger JE Jr (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210:6–16CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Is there a benefit to additional neuroaxial anesthesia in open nephrectomy? A prospective NSQIP propensity score analysis
Authors
Amr Mahran
Kirtishri Mishra
Danly Omil-Lima
Bissan Abboud
Michael Wang
Jason Jankowski
Robert Abouassaly
Lee Ponsky
Irma Lengu
Laura Bukavina
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02208-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

International Urology and Nephrology 9/2019 Go to the issue