Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 12/2016

01-12-2016 | Urology - Original Paper

A novel technique for repair of mid-penile hypospadias using a preputial skin flap: results of 110 patients

Authors: Hazem Elmoghazy, Mohamed M. Hussein, Elnisr Mohamed, Abdelbasset Badawy, Gamal Alsagheer, Ahmed Mamdouh Abd Elhamed

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several techniques have been used to repair mid-penile hypospadias; however, high failure rates and major complications have been reported. In this study, we describe a novel technique using a well-vascularized flap of the inner and outer preputial skin.

Methods

A total of 110 male children with hypospadias underwent repair by our technique between 2008 and 2015. The inclusion criteria were children with mid-penile or slightly more proximal hypospadias, with or without ventral chordae, and an intact prepuce of the cobra eyes variety. Recurrent cases, patients with other preputial types, and circumcised children were excluded from this study. The prepared flap was sutured in its natural longitudinal orientation to the created urethral plate strip to form a neo-urethra over a urethral catheter. Outcome measures included surgical success without the formation of a urethra-cutaneous fistula, no ischaemia of the flaps, glans dehiscence or infection and functional outcome and cosmetic appearance.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 3.3 years. There were 63 cases of mid-penile hypospadias (57.3 %), and in 47 cases (42.7 %), the meatus was slightly more proximal. The age of the patients ranged from 1.1 to 8.0 years, with a mean age of 4.6 ± 1.2 years. Surgery was successful in 106 (96.4 %) cases. Minor complications occurred in 11 patients (10 %) and included oedema of glans in ten patients and bluish discoloration on the ventral aspect of the glans close to the suture line in three patients. All patients improved within 2 weeks after surgery. Long-term follow-up revealed a properly functioning urethra with a forward, projectile, single, compact, and rifled urinary stream of adequate calibre and cosmetically acceptable repair. No cases of meatal retraction, meatal stenosis, urethral stricture, or acquired urethral diverticulum occurred.

Discussion

Our technique is different from the split prepuce in situ technique. We create a narrow strip of the urethral plate that facilitates glanular closure, and we use the inner and adjacent outer skin in a vertical manner to preserve excess skin for penile coverage. Prepuce is split at midline to preserve more preputial skin with favourable dartos tissue for penile skin coverage. The glans is closed using a stitch-by-stitch method that has not been described previously.

Conclusion

This study presents a novel technique for mid-penile hypospadias repair using a preputial skin flap with excellent results in terms of short- and long-term outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Radojicic ZI, Perovic SV (2004) Classification of prepuce in hypospadias according to morphological abnormalities and their impact on hypospadias repair. J Urol 172(1):301–304CrossRefPubMed Radojicic ZI, Perovic SV (2004) Classification of prepuce in hypospadias according to morphological abnormalities and their impact on hypospadias repair. J Urol 172(1):301–304CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Duplay S (1874) De l’hypospadias perineo-scrotal et de son traitement chirurgical. Arch Gen Med 23:513 Duplay S (1874) De l’hypospadias perineo-scrotal et de son traitement chirurgical. Arch Gen Med 23:513
3.
go back to reference Santangelo K, Rushton HG, Belman AB (2003) Outcome analysis of simple and complex urethrocutaneous fistula closure using a de-epithelialized or full-thickness skin advancement flap for coverage. J Urol 170:1589CrossRefPubMed Santangelo K, Rushton HG, Belman AB (2003) Outcome analysis of simple and complex urethrocutaneous fistula closure using a de-epithelialized or full-thickness skin advancement flap for coverage. J Urol 170:1589CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gonazlez R, Smith C, Denes ED (1996) Double onlay preputial flap for proximal hypospadias repair. J Urol 156:832–835CrossRef Gonazlez R, Smith C, Denes ED (1996) Double onlay preputial flap for proximal hypospadias repair. J Urol 156:832–835CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jayanthi V (2003) The modified Snodgrass hypospadias repair: reducing the risk of fistula and meatal stenosis. J Urol 170:1603CrossRefPubMed Jayanthi V (2003) The modified Snodgrass hypospadias repair: reducing the risk of fistula and meatal stenosis. J Urol 170:1603CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Snodgrass W, Yucel S (2007) Tubularized incised plate for midshaft and proximal hypospadias repair. J Urol 177:698CrossRefPubMed Snodgrass W, Yucel S (2007) Tubularized incised plate for midshaft and proximal hypospadias repair. J Urol 177:698CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Braga LHP, Pippi Salle JL, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S, Dave S, Farhat WA, Khoury AE, Bagli DJ (2007) Comparative analysis of tubularized incised plate versus onlay island flap urethroplasty for penoscrotal hypospadias. J Urol 178:1451–1457CrossRefPubMed Braga LHP, Pippi Salle JL, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S, Dave S, Farhat WA, Khoury AE, Bagli DJ (2007) Comparative analysis of tubularized incised plate versus onlay island flap urethroplasty for penoscrotal hypospadias. J Urol 178:1451–1457CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Xiao D, Nie X, Wang W, Zhou J, Zhang M, Zhou Z et al (2014) Comparison of transverse island flap onlay and tubularized incised-plate urethroplasties for primary proximal hypospadias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9:e106917CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xiao D, Nie X, Wang W, Zhou J, Zhang M, Zhou Z et al (2014) Comparison of transverse island flap onlay and tubularized incised-plate urethroplasties for primary proximal hypospadias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9:e106917CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Holland AJA, Smith GHH (2000) Effect of the depth and width of the urethral plate on tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. J Urol 164:489CrossRefPubMed Holland AJA, Smith GHH (2000) Effect of the depth and width of the urethral plate on tubularized incised plate urethroplasty. J Urol 164:489CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Standoli L (1982) One-stage repair of hypospadias: preputial island flap technique. Ann Plast Surg 9(1):81–88CrossRefPubMed Standoli L (1982) One-stage repair of hypospadias: preputial island flap technique. Ann Plast Surg 9(1):81–88CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Snodgrass W (1994) Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol 151(2):464–465PubMed Snodgrass W (1994) Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol 151(2):464–465PubMed
12.
go back to reference Duckett JW; DuckettJW (1981) The island flap technique for hypospadias repair. Urol Clin N Am 8(3):503–511 Duckett JW; DuckettJW (1981) The island flap technique for hypospadias repair. Urol Clin N Am 8(3):503–511
13.
go back to reference Turner-Warwick R (1979) Observations upon techniques for reconstruction of the urethral meatus, the hypospadiac glans deformity and the penile urethra. Urol Clin N Am 6(3):643–655 Turner-Warwick R (1979) Observations upon techniques for reconstruction of the urethral meatus, the hypospadiac glans deformity and the penile urethra. Urol Clin N Am 6(3):643–655
15.
go back to reference Metro MJ, Wu HY, Snyder HM III, Zderic SA, Canning DA (2001) Buccal mucosal grafts: lessons learned from an 8-year experience. J Urol 166(4):1459–1461CrossRefPubMed Metro MJ, Wu HY, Snyder HM III, Zderic SA, Canning DA (2001) Buccal mucosal grafts: lessons learned from an 8-year experience. J Urol 166(4):1459–1461CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ozgök Y, Ozgür Tan M, Kilciler M, Tahmaz L, Erduran D (2000) Use of bladder mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction. Int J Urol 7(10):355–360CrossRefPubMed Ozgök Y, Ozgür Tan M, Kilciler M, Tahmaz L, Erduran D (2000) Use of bladder mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction. Int J Urol 7(10):355–360CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Schnapka J, Mildenberger H (1991) Urethral reconstruction using anautologous bladder mucosal graft. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1(3):180–182CrossRefPubMed Schnapka J, Mildenberger H (1991) Urethral reconstruction using anautologous bladder mucosal graft. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1(3):180–182CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rushton HG, Belman AB (1998) The split prepuce in situ onlay hypospadias repair. J Urol 160(3 Pt 2):11346 Rushton HG, Belman AB (1998) The split prepuce in situ onlay hypospadias repair. J Urol 160(3 Pt 2):11346
20.
go back to reference Snodgrass WT (2002) Tubularized incised plate (TIP) hypospadias repair. Urol Clin N Am 29(2):285–290CrossRef Snodgrass WT (2002) Tubularized incised plate (TIP) hypospadias repair. Urol Clin N Am 29(2):285–290CrossRef
21.
go back to reference MacGillivray DM, Shankar KR, Rickwood AM (2002) Management of severe hypospadias using Glassberg’s modification of the Duckett repair. BJU Int 89(1):101–102CrossRefPubMed MacGillivray DM, Shankar KR, Rickwood AM (2002) Management of severe hypospadias using Glassberg’s modification of the Duckett repair. BJU Int 89(1):101–102CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Valla JS, Takvorian P, Dodat H et al (1991) Single-stage correction of posterior hypospadias (178 cases). Comparison of three techniques: free skin graft, free bladder mucosal graft, transverse pedicle preputial graft. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1(5):287–290CrossRefPubMed Valla JS, Takvorian P, Dodat H et al (1991) Single-stage correction of posterior hypospadias (178 cases). Comparison of three techniques: free skin graft, free bladder mucosal graft, transverse pedicle preputial graft. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1(5):287–290CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Elbakry A (2001) Management of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias repair: 10 years’ experience. BJU Int 88(6):590–595CrossRefPubMed Elbakry A (2001) Management of urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias repair: 10 years’ experience. BJU Int 88(6):590–595CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Demirbilek S, Kanmaz T, Aydin G, Yücesan S (2001) Outcomes of one-stage techniques for proximal hypospadias repair. Urology 58(2):267–270CrossRefPubMed Demirbilek S, Kanmaz T, Aydin G, Yücesan S (2001) Outcomes of one-stage techniques for proximal hypospadias repair. Urology 58(2):267–270CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Singh BP, Solanki FS, Kapoor R et al (2010) Factors predicting success in hypospadias repair using preputial flap with limited pedicle mobilization (Asopa procedure). Urology 76(1):92–96CrossRefPubMed Singh BP, Solanki FS, Kapoor R et al (2010) Factors predicting success in hypospadias repair using preputial flap with limited pedicle mobilization (Asopa procedure). Urology 76(1):92–96CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Fraumann SA, Stephany HA, Clayton DB, Thomas JC, Adams MC et al (2014) Long-term follow-up of children who underwent severe hypospadias repair using an online survey with validated questionnaires. J Pediatr Urol. 10(3):446–450CrossRefPubMed Fraumann SA, Stephany HA, Clayton DB, Thomas JC, Adams MC et al (2014) Long-term follow-up of children who underwent severe hypospadias repair using an online survey with validated questionnaires. J Pediatr Urol. 10(3):446–450CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Yildiz T, Tahtali IN, Ates Dc, Keles I (2013) age of patient is a risk factor for urethrocutaneous fistula in hypospadias surgery. J Urol 9(6ptA):900–903 Yildiz T, Tahtali IN, Ates Dc, Keles I (2013) age of patient is a risk factor for urethrocutaneous fistula in hypospadias surgery. J Urol 9(6ptA):900–903
28.
go back to reference Chin TW, Liu CS, Wei CF (2001) Hypospadias repair using a double onlay preputial flap. Pediatr Surg Int 17:496–498CrossRefPubMed Chin TW, Liu CS, Wei CF (2001) Hypospadias repair using a double onlay preputial flap. Pediatr Surg Int 17:496–498CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A novel technique for repair of mid-penile hypospadias using a preputial skin flap: results of 110 patients
Authors
Hazem Elmoghazy
Mohamed M. Hussein
Elnisr Mohamed
Abdelbasset Badawy
Gamal Alsagheer
Ahmed Mamdouh Abd Elhamed
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1416-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

International Urology and Nephrology 12/2016 Go to the issue