Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Urology - Original Paper

Midline lesions of the prostate: role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy and implications in Gleason risk stratification

Authors: Akhil Muthigi, Abhinav Sidana, Arvin K. George, Michael Kongnyuy, Nabeel Shakir, Meet Kadakia, Mahir Maruf, Thomas P. Frye, Francesca Mertan, Daniel Su, Maria J. Merino, Peter L. Choyke, Baris Turkbey, Bradford J. Wood, Peter A. Pinto

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy (FBx) has proven efficacy in targeting suspicious areas that are traditionally missed by systematic 12-core biopsy (SBx). Midline prostate lesions are undersampled during SBx, as traditional approaches aim laterally during TRUS biopsy. The aim of our study was to determine the utility of FBx for targeting midline lesions identified on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI).

Methods

A review was performed of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing mpMRI followed by FBx and SBx from 2007 to 2015. Midline location was defined as any lesion crossing the midline on axial imaging and involving both prostatic lobes. Index lesion was defined as lesion with highest Gleason score on biopsy. Patient demographic, imaging, and histopathologic data were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to determine independent predictors of having clinically significant (CS) cancer (Gleason ≥ 7) in midline lesions.

Results

Out of 1266 patients, we identified 202 suspicious midline lesions in 190 patients [median (IQR) age 63 (10) years; PSA 7.6 (6.6)]. Eighty-eight (46.3 %) patients had cancer detection on FBx of midline lesion. A midline target represented the index lesion of the prostate in 63/190 (33.2 %) patients. Risk category upgrading based on FBx of a midline lesion compared to SBx occurred in 45/190 patients (23.7 %). On multivariate analysis, higher PSA (p = .001), lower MRI-derived prostate volume (p < .001), and moderate–high or high suspicion on mpMRI (p = .014) predicted CS cancer in midline lesions.

Conclusions

MRI-TRUS FBx facilitates sampling of midline lesions. Integration of mpMRI and FBx for targeting of midline lesions improves detection of CS prostate cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jiang X, Zhu S, Feng G, Zhang Z, Li C, Li H et al (2013) Is an initial saturation prostate biopsy scheme better than an extended scheme for detection of prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 63(6):1031–1039CrossRefPubMed Jiang X, Zhu S, Feng G, Zhang Z, Li C, Li H et al (2013) Is an initial saturation prostate biopsy scheme better than an extended scheme for detection of prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 63(6):1031–1039CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ukimura O, Coleman JA, de la Taille A, Emberton M, Epstein JI, Freedland SJ et al (2013) Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care. Eur Urol 63(2):214–230CrossRefPubMed Ukimura O, Coleman JA, de la Taille A, Emberton M, Epstein JI, Freedland SJ et al (2013) Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care. Eur Urol 63(2):214–230CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kanao K, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Reuter VE, Fine SW (2013) Can transrectal needle biopsy be optimised to detect nearly all prostate cancer with a volume of >/=0.5 mL? A three-dimensional analysis. BJU Int 112(7):898–904PubMed Kanao K, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Reuter VE, Fine SW (2013) Can transrectal needle biopsy be optimised to detect nearly all prostate cancer with a volume of >/=0.5 mL? A three-dimensional analysis. BJU Int 112(7):898–904PubMed
4.
go back to reference Hwang I, Kim SY, Cho JY, Lee MS, Kim SH (2016) The diagnostic ability of an additional midline peripheral zone biopsy in transrectal ultrasonography-guided 12-core prostate biopsy to detect midline prostate cancer. Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) 35(1):61–68 Hwang I, Kim SY, Cho JY, Lee MS, Kim SH (2016) The diagnostic ability of an additional midline peripheral zone biopsy in transrectal ultrasonography-guided 12-core prostate biopsy to detect midline prostate cancer. Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) 35(1):61–68
5.
go back to reference Guichard G, Larre S, Gallina A, Lazar A, Faucon H, Chemama S et al (2007) Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 52(2):430–435CrossRefPubMed Guichard G, Larre S, Gallina A, Lazar A, Faucon H, Chemama S et al (2007) Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 52(2):430–435CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carter HB (2001) Importance of posterolateral needle biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer. Urology 57(6):1112–1116CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carter HB (2001) Importance of posterolateral needle biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer. Urology 57(6):1112–1116CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference George AK, Turkbey B, Valayil SG, Muthigi A, Mertan F, Kongnyuy M et al (2016) A urologist’s perspective on prostate cancer imaging: past, present, and future. Abdom Radiol 41(5):805–816CrossRef George AK, Turkbey B, Valayil SG, Muthigi A, Mertan F, Kongnyuy M et al (2016) A urologist’s perspective on prostate cancer imaging: past, present, and future. Abdom Radiol 41(5):805–816CrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Kongnyuy M, George AK, Rastinehad AR, Pinto PA (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy: review of technology, techniques, and outcomes. Curr Urol Rep 17(4):32CrossRefPubMed Kongnyuy M, George AK, Rastinehad AR, Pinto PA (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy: review of technology, techniques, and outcomes. Curr Urol Rep 17(4):32CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, George AK, Rothwax J, Shakir N et al (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA 313(4):390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, George AK, Rothwax J, Shakir N et al (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA 313(4):390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, Ehdaie B, Hadaschik BA, Marks LS et al (2015) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 68(1):8–19CrossRefPubMed Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, Ehdaie B, Hadaschik BA, Marks LS et al (2015) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 68(1):8–19CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rastinehad AR, Turkbey B, Salami SS, Yaskiv O, George AK, Fakhoury M et al (2014) Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 191(6):1749–1754CrossRefPubMed Rastinehad AR, Turkbey B, Salami SS, Yaskiv O, George AK, Fakhoury M et al (2014) Improving detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 191(6):1749–1754CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Radtke JP, Boxler S, Kuru TH, Wolf MB, Alt CD, Popeneciu IV et al (2015) Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric and multiparametric MRI with MRI-targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance. Prost Cancer Prost Dis 18(3):288–296CrossRef Radtke JP, Boxler S, Kuru TH, Wolf MB, Alt CD, Popeneciu IV et al (2015) Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric and multiparametric MRI with MRI-targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance. Prost Cancer Prost Dis 18(3):288–296CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nix JW, Turkbey B, Hoang A, Volkin D, Yerram N, Chua C et al (2012) Very distal apical prostate tumours: identification on multiparametric MRI at 3 Tesla. BJU Int 110(11b):E694–E700CrossRefPubMed Nix JW, Turkbey B, Hoang A, Volkin D, Yerram N, Chua C et al (2012) Very distal apical prostate tumours: identification on multiparametric MRI at 3 Tesla. BJU Int 110(11b):E694–E700CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sankineni S, George AK, Brown AM, Rais-Bahrami S, Wood BJ, Merino MJ et al (2015) Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy. Abdom Imaging 40(7):2557–2565CrossRefPubMed Sankineni S, George AK, Brown AM, Rais-Bahrami S, Wood BJ, Merino MJ et al (2015) Posterior subcapsular prostate cancer: identification with mpMRI and MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy. Abdom Imaging 40(7):2557–2565CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kongnyuy M, Sidana A, George AK, Muthigi A, Iyer A, Fascelli M et al (2016) The significance of anterior prostate lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in African-American men. Urol Oncol 34(6):254.e15–254.e21CrossRef Kongnyuy M, Sidana A, George AK, Muthigi A, Iyer A, Fascelli M et al (2016) The significance of anterior prostate lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in African-American men. Urol Oncol 34(6):254.e15–254.e21CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rais-Bahrami S, Siddiqui MM, Turkbey B, Stamatakis L, Logan J, Hoang AN et al (2013) Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer. J Urol 190(5):1721–1727CrossRefPubMed Rais-Bahrami S, Siddiqui MM, Turkbey B, Stamatakis L, Logan J, Hoang AN et al (2013) Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer. J Urol 190(5):1721–1727CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Muller BG, Shih JH, Sankineni S, Marko J, Rais-Bahrami S, George AK et al (2015) Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 277(3):741–750CrossRefPubMed Muller BG, Shih JH, Sankineni S, Marko J, Rais-Bahrami S, George AK et al (2015) Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 277(3):741–750CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chelluri R, Kilchevsky A, George AK, Sidana A, Frye TP, Su D et al (2016) Prostate cancer diagnosis on repeat MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of benign lesions: recommendations for repeat sampling. J Urol. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.066 Chelluri R, Kilchevsky A, George AK, Sidana A, Frye TP, Su D et al (2016) Prostate cancer diagnosis on repeat MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of benign lesions: recommendations for repeat sampling. J Urol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2016.​02.​066
21.
go back to reference Hong CW, Rais-Bahrami S, Walton-Diaz A, Shakir N, Su D, George AK et al (2015) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (MRI-US) fusion-guided prostate biopsies obtained from axial and sagittal approaches. BJU Int 115(5):772–779CrossRefPubMed Hong CW, Rais-Bahrami S, Walton-Diaz A, Shakir N, Su D, George AK et al (2015) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (MRI-US) fusion-guided prostate biopsies obtained from axial and sagittal approaches. BJU Int 115(5):772–779CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Frye TP, Pinto PA, George AK (2015) Optimizing patient population for MP-MRI and fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection. Curr Urol Rep 16(7):50CrossRefPubMed Frye TP, Pinto PA, George AK (2015) Optimizing patient population for MP-MRI and fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection. Curr Urol Rep 16(7):50CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Raskolnikov D, George AK, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, Shakir NA, Okoro C et al (2014) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and image-guided biopsy to detect seminal vesicle invasion by prostate cancer. J Endourol 28(11):1283–1289CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Raskolnikov D, George AK, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, Shakir NA, Okoro C et al (2014) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and image-guided biopsy to detect seminal vesicle invasion by prostate cancer. J Endourol 28(11):1283–1289CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Okoro C, George AK, Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Walton-Diaz A, Shakir NA et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy significantly outperforms systematic 12-Core biopsy for prediction of total magnetic resonance imaging tumor volume in active surveillance patients. J Endourol 29(10):1115–1121CrossRefPubMed Okoro C, George AK, Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Walton-Diaz A, Shakir NA et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion prostate biopsy significantly outperforms systematic 12-Core biopsy for prediction of total magnetic resonance imaging tumor volume in active surveillance patients. J Endourol 29(10):1115–1121CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Baco E, Rud E, Ukimura O, Vlatkovic L, Svindland A, Matsugasumi T et al (2014) Effect of targeted biopsy guided by elastic image fusion of MRI with 3D-TRUS on diagnosis of anterior prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 32(8):1300–1307CrossRefPubMed Baco E, Rud E, Ukimura O, Vlatkovic L, Svindland A, Matsugasumi T et al (2014) Effect of targeted biopsy guided by elastic image fusion of MRI with 3D-TRUS on diagnosis of anterior prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 32(8):1300–1307CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Walton Diaz A, Hoang AN, Turkbey B, Hong CW, Truong H, Sterling T et al (2013) Can magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy improve cancer detection in enlarged prostates? J Urol 190(6):2020–2025CrossRefPubMed Walton Diaz A, Hoang AN, Turkbey B, Hong CW, Truong H, Sterling T et al (2013) Can magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy improve cancer detection in enlarged prostates? J Urol 190(6):2020–2025CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Costa DN, Lotan Y, Rofsky NM, Roehrborn C, Liu A, Hornberger B et al (2016) Assessment of prospectively assigned likert scores for targeted magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsies in patients with suspected prostate cancer. J Urol 195(1):80–87CrossRefPubMed Costa DN, Lotan Y, Rofsky NM, Roehrborn C, Liu A, Hornberger B et al (2016) Assessment of prospectively assigned likert scores for targeted magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsies in patients with suspected prostate cancer. J Urol 195(1):80–87CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ, Macairan M, Lieu P et al (2014) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65(4):809–815CrossRefPubMed Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ, Macairan M, Lieu P et al (2014) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65(4):809–815CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Rastinehad AR, Abboud SF, George AK, Frye T, Ho R, Chelluri R et al (2016) Reproducibility of multiparametric MRI and fusion-guided prostate biopsy: multi-institutional external validation by a propensity score matched cohort. J Urol 195(6):1737–1743CrossRefPubMed Rastinehad AR, Abboud SF, George AK, Frye T, Ho R, Chelluri R et al (2016) Reproducibility of multiparametric MRI and fusion-guided prostate biopsy: multi-institutional external validation by a propensity score matched cohort. J Urol 195(6):1737–1743CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Midline lesions of the prostate: role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy and implications in Gleason risk stratification
Authors
Akhil Muthigi
Abhinav Sidana
Arvin K. George
Michael Kongnyuy
Nabeel Shakir
Meet Kadakia
Mahir Maruf
Thomas P. Frye
Francesca Mertan
Daniel Su
Maria J. Merino
Peter L. Choyke
Baris Turkbey
Bradford J. Wood
Peter A. Pinto
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1336-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

International Urology and Nephrology 9/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.