Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 4/2013

01-08-2013 | Urology - Original Paper

Analysis of female voiding dysfunction: a prospective, multi-center study

Authors: Yong Sun Choi, Joon Chul Kim, Kyu Sung Lee, Ju Tae Seo, Hyung-Jee Kim, Tag Keun Yoo, Jong Bouk Lee, Myung-Soo Choo, Jeong Gu Lee, Ji Youl Lee

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Female voiding dysfunction lacks clear definitions or objective data even to this day due to the relatively low prevalence and complex etiologies of voiding dysfunction in women compared to men. The prevalence varies widely from 2.7 to 23 % (Nitti et al. in J Urol 161(5):1535–1540, 1999; Rees et al. in Br J Urol 47(7):853–860, 1975; Groutz et al. in Neurourol Urodyn 19(3):213–220, 2000; Farrar et al. in Br J Urol 47(7):815–822, 1975; Massey and Abrams in Br J Urol 61(1):36–39, 1988; Chassagne et al. in Urology 51(3):408–411, 1998). Diagnostic criteria and management of female voiding dysfunction have not yet been established. We performed a prospective, multi-center study at nine hospitals to investigate the characteristics and prevalence of female voiding dysfunction.

Materials and methods

A total of 1,415 women visited urology clinics in nine hospitals from September to December 2005. Among them, 792 patients presented with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). We analyzed their urinary symptoms with an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and obtained objective data using uroflowmetry, residual urine volume, and urinalysis. The authors hereby define female voiding dysfunction as maximum flow rate (Q max) of 15 ml/s or less, which may be due to either bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) or bladder dysfunction caused by detrusor underactivity. BOO was defined as Q max <15 ml/s with detrusor pressure >20 cmH2O at Q max, and detrusor underactivity was defined as Q max <15 ml/s with detrusor pressure <20 cmH2O at Q max on pressure flow studies.

Results

Hundred and two patients (12.8 %) from a total of 792 LUTS patients complained of voiding difficulty. Mean total IPSS score, mean IPSS subscores for voiding and storage symptom was 19.5 ± 7.9, 12.0 ± 5.0, and 8.4 ± 3.4, respectively. Among the seven categories of IPSS, incomplete emptying was the most common symptom followed by weak stream. Eighty-nine patients (87.2 %) from a total of 102 voiding dysfunction patients showed BOO, while 13 patients (12.8 %) showed detrusor underactivity. Concomitant diseases observed with voiding dysfunctions were overactive bladder (32 patients), stress urinary incontinence (25), detrusor underactivity (13), previous stress urinary incontinence surgery (12), pelvic organ prolapse (4), and anatomical obstruction (3 patients).

Conclusion

The prevalence of voiding difficulty in female urology patients who visit urologic office clinic was 7.2 and 12.8 % in female LUTS patients. Voiding symptoms were more common than storage symptoms, while functional BOO was more prevalent than detrusor underactivity in female voiding difficulty patients. We may expect alpha blockers to be an effective treatment option in female voiding difficulty due to functional BOO.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nitti VW, Tu LM, Gitlin J (1999) Diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. J Urol 161(5):1535–1540PubMedCrossRef Nitti VW, Tu LM, Gitlin J (1999) Diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. J Urol 161(5):1535–1540PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rees DL, Whitfield HN, Islam AK, Doyle PT, Mayo ME, Wickham JE (1975) Urodynamic findings in adult females with frequency and dysuria. Br J Urol 47(7):853–860PubMedCrossRef Rees DL, Whitfield HN, Islam AK, Doyle PT, Mayo ME, Wickham JE (1975) Urodynamic findings in adult females with frequency and dysuria. Br J Urol 47(7):853–860PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC (2000) Bladder outlet obstruction in women: definition and characteristics. Neurourol Urodyn 19(3):213–220PubMedCrossRef Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC (2000) Bladder outlet obstruction in women: definition and characteristics. Neurourol Urodyn 19(3):213–220PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Farrar DJ, Osborne JL, Stephenson TP, Whiteside CG, Weir J, Berry J, Milroy EJ, Warwick RT (1975) A urodynamic view of bladder outflow obstruction in the female: factors influencing the results of treatment. Br J Urol 47(7):815–822PubMedCrossRef Farrar DJ, Osborne JL, Stephenson TP, Whiteside CG, Weir J, Berry J, Milroy EJ, Warwick RT (1975) A urodynamic view of bladder outflow obstruction in the female: factors influencing the results of treatment. Br J Urol 47(7):815–822PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chassagne S, Bernier PA, Haab F, Roehrborn CG, Reisch JS, Zimmern PE (1998) Proposed cutoff values to define bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urology 51(3):408–411PubMedCrossRef Chassagne S, Bernier PA, Haab F, Roehrborn CG, Reisch JS, Zimmern PE (1998) Proposed cutoff values to define bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urology 51(3):408–411PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Stanton SL, Ozsoy C, Hilton P (1983) Voiding difficulties in the female: prevalence, clinical and urodynamic review. Obstet Gynecol 61(2):144–147PubMed Stanton SL, Ozsoy C, Hilton P (1983) Voiding difficulties in the female: prevalence, clinical and urodynamic review. Obstet Gynecol 61(2):144–147PubMed
8.
go back to reference Dwyer PL, Desmedt E (1994) Impaired bladder emptying in women. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 34(1):73–78CrossRef Dwyer PL, Desmedt E (1994) Impaired bladder emptying in women. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 34(1):73–78CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kim HS, Lee U, Lee MH, Choo (2001) Cut-off value for bladder outlet obstruction in pressure-flow study in female: a prospective study. Korean J Urol 42:1146–1151 Kim HS, Lee U, Lee MH, Choo (2001) Cut-off value for bladder outlet obstruction in pressure-flow study in female: a prospective study. Korean J Urol 42:1146–1151
10.
go back to reference Quesada EM, Scott FB, Cardus D (1968) Functional classification of neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 49(12):692–697PubMed Quesada EM, Scott FB, Cardus D (1968) Functional classification of neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 49(12):692–697PubMed
11.
go back to reference Wein AJ (1981) Classification of neurogenic voiding dysfunction. J Urol 125(5):605–609PubMed Wein AJ (1981) Classification of neurogenic voiding dysfunction. J Urol 125(5):605–609PubMed
12.
go back to reference Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT (1988) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 114:5–19PubMed Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT (1988) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 114:5–19PubMed
13.
go back to reference Groutz A, Gordon D, Lessing JB, Wolman I, Jaffa A, David MP (1999) Prevalence and characteristics of voiding difficulties in women: are subjective symptoms substantiated by objective urodynamic data? Urology 54(2):268–272PubMedCrossRef Groutz A, Gordon D, Lessing JB, Wolman I, Jaffa A, David MP (1999) Prevalence and characteristics of voiding difficulties in women: are subjective symptoms substantiated by objective urodynamic data? Urology 54(2):268–272PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Axelrod SL, Blaivas JG (1987) Bladder neck obstruction in women. J Urol 137(3):497–499PubMed Axelrod SL, Blaivas JG (1987) Bladder neck obstruction in women. J Urol 137(3):497–499PubMed
Metadata
Title
Analysis of female voiding dysfunction: a prospective, multi-center study
Authors
Yong Sun Choi
Joon Chul Kim
Kyu Sung Lee
Ju Tae Seo
Hyung-Jee Kim
Tag Keun Yoo
Jong Bouk Lee
Myung-Soo Choo
Jeong Gu Lee
Ji Youl Lee
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0475-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

International Urology and Nephrology 4/2013 Go to the issue