Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 3/2022

Open Access 01-03-2022 | Hepatitis

Psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-HCC18 in patients with previously treated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Authors: Daniel Serrano, Lauren Podger, Gisoo Barnes, James Song, Boxiong Tang

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

To demonstrate the measurement properties of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Hepatocellular Carcinoma 18-question module (EORTC QLQ-HCC18) within a previously treated, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) clinical trial population that was distinct from the published QLQ-HCC18 validation population. Analyses were conducted using data from BGB-A317-208, an open label, international, clinical trial assessing efficacy and safety of the monoclonal antibody tislelizumab in adult HCC patients. The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and QLQ-HCC18 instruments were assessed at baseline and weeks 3 and 9 follow-up visits. Per US Food and Drug Administration guidance, psychometric validation of the QLQ-HCC18 included reliability (internal consistency and test–retest), construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity and known-groups validity), ability to detect change, and meaningful within-patient change (MWPC). Known-groups validity and MWPC analyses were also stratified on several pre-defined subgroups. A total of 248 patients were included. Only the QLQ-HCC18 fatigue, nutrition, and index domains demonstrated acceptable internal consistency; acceptable test–retest reliability was found for fatigue, body image, nutrition, pain, sexual interest, and index domains. The QLQ-HCC18 fatigue domain achieved the pre-specified criterion defining acceptable convergent and discriminant validity for 13 of 16 correlations, whereas the index domain achieved the pre-specified criterion for 14 of 16 correlations. Clear differentiation of the QLQ-HCC18 change scores between improvement and maintenance anchor groups were observed for body image, fatigue, pain, and index domains, whereas differentiation between deterioration and maintenance anchor groups were observed for fever and fatigue domains. MWPC point estimates defining improvement for the QLQ-HCC18 fatigue and index domains were −7.18 and −4.07, respectively; MWPC point estimates defining deterioration were 5.34 and 3.16, respectively. The EORTC QLQ-HCC18 fatigue and index domains consistently demonstrated robust psychometric properties, supporting the use of these domains as suitable patient-reported endpoints within a previously treated, unresectable HCC patient population.
Footnotes
1
The \({\omega }^{2}\) statistic is a less biased estimate, which corrects for sample size bias associated with other uncorrected effect size estimates such as Eta squared.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hauser, S. L., Bar-Or, A., Comi, G., Giovannoni, G., Hartung, H.-P., Hemmer, B., et al. (2017). Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine., 376(3), 221–234.CrossRef Hauser, S. L., Bar-Or, A., Comi, G., Giovannoni, G., Hartung, H.-P., Hemmer, B., et al. (2017). Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine., 376(3), 221–234.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference El-Serag, H. B. (2012). Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology, 142(6), 1264–73.e1.PubMedCrossRef El-Serag, H. B. (2012). Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology, 142(6), 1264–73.e1.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Torre, L. A., Bray, F., Siegel, R. L., Ferlay, J., Lortet-Tieulent, J., & Jemal, A. (2015). Global cancer statistics 2012. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 65(2), 87–108.CrossRef Torre, L. A., Bray, F., Siegel, R. L., Ferlay, J., Lortet-Tieulent, J., & Jemal, A. (2015). Global cancer statistics 2012. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 65(2), 87–108.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ghouri, Y., Mian, I., & Rowe, J. (2017). Review of hepatocellular carcinoma: Epidemiology, etiology, and carcinogenesis. Journal of Carcinogenesis., 16(1), 1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ghouri, Y., Mian, I., & Rowe, J. (2017). Review of hepatocellular carcinoma: Epidemiology, etiology, and carcinogenesis. Journal of Carcinogenesis., 16(1), 1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bosch, F. X., Ribes, J., Cléries, R., & Díaz, M. (2005). Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinics in liver disease., 9(2), 191–211.PubMedCrossRef Bosch, F. X., Ribes, J., Cléries, R., & Díaz, M. (2005). Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinics in liver disease., 9(2), 191–211.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gandhi, S., Khubchandani, S., & Iyer, R. (2014). Quality of life and hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology., 5(4), 296–317.PubMedPubMedCentral Gandhi, S., Khubchandani, S., & Iyer, R. (2014). Quality of life and hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology., 5(4), 296–317.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Bonnetain, F., Paoletti, X., Collette, S., Doffoel, M., Bouché, O., Raoul, J. L., et al. (2008). Quality of life as a prognostic factor of overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from two French clinical trials. Quality of life research : An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation., 17(6), 831–843.CrossRef Bonnetain, F., Paoletti, X., Collette, S., Doffoel, M., Bouché, O., Raoul, J. L., et al. (2008). Quality of life as a prognostic factor of overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from two French clinical trials. Quality of life research : An international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation., 17(6), 831–843.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Li, L., Mo, F. K., Chan, S. L., Hui, E. P., Tang, N. S., Koh, J., et al. (2017). Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma - clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data. BMC Cancer, 17(1), 8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Li, L., Mo, F. K., Chan, S. L., Hui, E. P., Tang, N. S., Koh, J., et al. (2017). Prognostic values of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 index-scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma - clinical application of health-related quality-of-life data. BMC Cancer, 17(1), 8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Diouf, M., Filleron, T., Barbare, J. C., Fin, L., Picard, C., Bouché, O., et al. (2013). The added value of quality of life (QoL) for prognosis of overall survival in patients with palliative hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of hepatology., 58(3), 509–521.PubMedCrossRef Diouf, M., Filleron, T., Barbare, J. C., Fin, L., Picard, C., Bouché, O., et al. (2013). The added value of quality of life (QoL) for prognosis of overall survival in patients with palliative hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of hepatology., 58(3), 509–521.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wible, B. C., Rilling, W. S., Drescher, P., Hieb, R. A., Saeian, K., Frangakis, C., et al. (2010). Longitudinal quality of life assessment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after primary transarterial chemoembolization. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 21(7), 1024–1030.PubMedCrossRef Wible, B. C., Rilling, W. S., Drescher, P., Hieb, R. A., Saeian, K., Frangakis, C., et al. (2010). Longitudinal quality of life assessment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after primary transarterial chemoembolization. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 21(7), 1024–1030.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chie, W. C., Blazeby, J. M., Hsiao, C. F., Chiu, H. C., Poon, R. T., Mikoshiba, N., et al. (2012). International cross-cultural field validation of an european organization for research and treatment of cancer questionnaire module for patients with primary liver cancer, the european organization for research and treatment of cancer quality-of-life questionnaire HCC18. Hepatology, 55(4), 1122–1129.PubMedCrossRef Chie, W. C., Blazeby, J. M., Hsiao, C. F., Chiu, H. C., Poon, R. T., Mikoshiba, N., et al. (2012). International cross-cultural field validation of an european organization for research and treatment of cancer questionnaire module for patients with primary liver cancer, the european organization for research and treatment of cancer quality-of-life questionnaire HCC18. Hepatology, 55(4), 1122–1129.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yang, Z., Wan, C., Li, W., Cun, Y., Meng, Q., Ding, Y., et al. (2015). Development and validation of the simplified chinese version of EORTC QLQ-HCC18 for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer investigation., 33(8), 340–346.PubMedCrossRef Yang, Z., Wan, C., Li, W., Cun, Y., Meng, Q., Ding, Y., et al. (2015). Development and validation of the simplified chinese version of EORTC QLQ-HCC18 for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer investigation., 33(8), 340–346.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Piena, M. A., Schoeman, O., Palace, J., Duddy, M., Harty, G. T., & Wong, S. L. (2020). Modified Delphi study of decision-making around treatment sequencing in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. European Journal of Neurology., 27(8), 1530–1536.PubMedCrossRef Piena, M. A., Schoeman, O., Palace, J., Duddy, M., Harty, G. T., & Wong, S. L. (2020). Modified Delphi study of decision-making around treatment sequencing in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. European Journal of Neurology., 27(8), 1530–1536.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Palace, J., Bregenzer, T., Tremlett, H., Oger, J., Zhu, F., Boggild, M., et al. (2014). UK multiple sclerosis risk-sharing scheme: a new natural history dataset and an improved Markov model. British Medical Journal Open, 4(1), 004073. Palace, J., Bregenzer, T., Tremlett, H., Oger, J., Zhu, F., Boggild, M., et al. (2014). UK multiple sclerosis risk-sharing scheme: a new natural history dataset and an improved Markov model. British Medical Journal Open, 4(1), 004073.
16.
go back to reference Topalian, S. L., Hodi, F. S., Brahmer, J. R., Gettinger, S. N., Smith, D. C., McDermott, D. F., et al. (2012). Safety, activity, and immune correlates of Anti–PD-1 antibody in cancer. New England Journal of Medicine., 366(26), 2443–2454.CrossRef Topalian, S. L., Hodi, F. S., Brahmer, J. R., Gettinger, S. N., Smith, D. C., McDermott, D. F., et al. (2012). Safety, activity, and immune correlates of Anti–PD-1 antibody in cancer. New England Journal of Medicine., 366(26), 2443–2454.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bersanelli, M., Leonetti, A., & Buti, S. (2017). The link between calcitriol and anticancer immunotherapy: Vitamin D as the possible balance between inflammation and autoimmunity in the immune-checkpoint blockade. Immunotherapy, 9(14), 1127–1131.PubMedCrossRef Bersanelli, M., Leonetti, A., & Buti, S. (2017). The link between calcitriol and anticancer immunotherapy: Vitamin D as the possible balance between inflammation and autoimmunity in the immune-checkpoint blockade. Immunotherapy, 9(14), 1127–1131.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Oken, M. M., Creech, R. H., Tormey, D. C., Horton, J., Davis, T. E., McFadden, E. T., et al. (1982). Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group. American Journal of Clinical Oncology., 5(6), 649–655.PubMedCrossRef Oken, M. M., Creech, R. H., Tormey, D. C., Horton, J., Davis, T. E., McFadden, E. T., et al. (1982). Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group. American Journal of Clinical Oncology., 5(6), 649–655.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute., 85(5), 365–376.PubMedCrossRef Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute., 85(5), 365–376.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kemmler, G., Holzner, B., Kopp, M., Dünser, M., Margreiter, R., Greil, R., et al. (1999). Comparison of two quality-of-life instruments for cancer patients: The functional assessment of cancer therapy-general and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire-C30. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology., 17(9), 2932–2940.CrossRef Kemmler, G., Holzner, B., Kopp, M., Dünser, M., Margreiter, R., Greil, R., et al. (1999). Comparison of two quality-of-life instruments for cancer patients: The functional assessment of cancer therapy-general and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire-C30. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology., 17(9), 2932–2940.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Blazeby, J. M., Currie, E., Zee, B. C., Chie, W. C., Poon, R. T., & Garden, O. J. (2004). Development of a questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, the EORTC QLQ-HCC18. European Journal of Cancer, 40(16), 2439–2444.PubMedCrossRef Blazeby, J. M., Currie, E., Zee, B. C., Chie, W. C., Poon, R. T., & Garden, O. J. (2004). Development of a questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, the EORTC QLQ-HCC18. European Journal of Cancer, 40(16), 2439–2444.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Clinical Trial Endpoints for the Approval of Cancer Drugs and Biologics U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration; 2018. Clinical Trial Endpoints for the Approval of Cancer Drugs and Biologics U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration; 2018.
23.
go back to reference Hettle, R., Harty, G., & Wong, S. L. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets, alemtuzumab, and natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with high disease activity in England. Journal of Medical Economics, 21(7), 676–686.PubMedCrossRef Hettle, R., Harty, G., & Wong, S. L. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets, alemtuzumab, and natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with high disease activity in England. Journal of Medical Economics, 21(7), 676–686.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 37.CrossRef Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 37.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin., 86(2), 420–428.PubMedCrossRef Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin., 86(2), 420–428.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology., 60(1), 34–42.PubMedCrossRef Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology., 60(1), 34–42.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2007) Adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2007) Adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
28.
go back to reference Choo, S. P., Tan, W. L., Goh, B. K. P., Tai, W. M., & Zhu, A. X. (2016). Comparison of hepatocellular carcinoma in Eastern versus Western populations. Cancer, 122(22), 3430–3446.PubMedCrossRef Choo, S. P., Tan, W. L., Goh, B. K. P., Tai, W. M., & Zhu, A. X. (2016). Comparison of hepatocellular carcinoma in Eastern versus Western populations. Cancer, 122(22), 3430–3446.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Liang, M. H. (2000). Longitudinal construct validity: establishment of clinical meaning in patient evaluative instruments. Medical Care., 38(9), 84–90. Liang, M. H. (2000). Longitudinal construct validity: establishment of clinical meaning in patient evaluative instruments. Medical Care., 38(9), 84–90.
30.
go back to reference Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods., 8(4), 434–447.PubMedCrossRef Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods., 8(4), 434–447.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Chie, W. C., Blazeby, J. M., Hsiao, C. F., Chiu, H. C., Poon, R. T., Mikoshiba, N., et al. (2017). Differences in health-related quality of life between European and Asian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology., 13(5), e304–e311.PubMedCrossRef Chie, W. C., Blazeby, J. M., Hsiao, C. F., Chiu, H. C., Poon, R. T., Mikoshiba, N., et al. (2017). Differences in health-related quality of life between European and Asian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology., 13(5), e304–e311.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Osoba, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J., Zee, B., & Pater, J. (1998). Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal Of The American Society Of Clinical Oncology., 16(1), 139–144.CrossRef Osoba, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J., Zee, B., & Pater, J. (1998). Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal Of The American Society Of Clinical Oncology., 16(1), 139–144.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference King, M. T. (1996). The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal Of Quality Of Life Aspects Of Treatment, Care And Rehabilitation., 5(6), 555–567.CrossRef King, M. T. (1996). The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Quality of Life Research : An International Journal Of Quality Of Life Aspects Of Treatment, Care And Rehabilitation., 5(6), 555–567.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology 1904–1920, 3(3), 271–295.CrossRef Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology 1904–1920, 3(3), 271–295.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Brown, W. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology 1904–1920, 3(3), 296–322.CrossRef Brown, W. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology 1904–1920, 3(3), 296–322.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-HCC18 in patients with previously treated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Authors
Daniel Serrano
Lauren Podger
Gisoo Barnes
James Song
Boxiong Tang
Publication date
01-03-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02992-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Quality of Life Research 3/2022 Go to the issue