Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 7/2016

Open Access 01-07-2016 | Brief Communication

The EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaire for colorectal cancer: validation of the Dutch version

Authors: A. M. Stiggelbout, M. Kunneman, M. C. M. Baas-Thijssen, P. A. Neijenhuis, A. K. Loor, S. Jägers, R. Vree, C. A. M. Marijnen, A. H. Pieterse

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To validate the Dutch version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaire for colorectal cancer.

Methods

We translated and pilot-tested the original questionnaire in the Netherlands, following EORTC guidelines. We assessed factor structure, reliability and construct validity in different samples of patients from four hospitals.

Results

Of 296 patients, 236 (80 %) returned the questionnaire, and 27 out of 48 patients returned the retest questionnaire. In addition to the original three scales, we found a reliable bowel functioning scale (α = 0.80), reducing the number of individual items by five. Two of the other scales had sufficient to good reliability (urinary frequency, α = 0.71, original α = 0.75, body image α = 0.80, original α = 0.84), the third, blood and mucus in stool, only moderate (α = 0.56, original α = 0.69). Item functioning was sufficient to excellent for all but two items (urinary incontinence and dysuria). Construct validity was similar to that in earlier studies.

Conclusion

We found a very satisfactory scale for bowel problems, in patients both with and without stoma. The body image and urinary incontinence scales were reliable, and construct validity was sufficient. We suggest the questionnaire to be adapted to decrease the number of individual items, improve the scales, and therefore increase reliability of the entire questionnaire.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sprangers, M. A., Te Velde, A., & Aaronson, N. K. (1999). The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. European Journal of Cancer, 35, 238–247.CrossRefPubMed Sprangers, M. A., Te Velde, A., & Aaronson, N. K. (1999). The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. European Journal of Cancer, 35, 238–247.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gujral, S., Conroy, T., Fleissner, C., Sezer, O., King, P. M., Avery, K. N., et al. (2007). Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: an update of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire. European Journal of Cancer, 43, 1564–1573.CrossRefPubMed Gujral, S., Conroy, T., Fleissner, C., Sezer, O., King, P. M., Avery, K. N., et al. (2007). Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: an update of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire. European Journal of Cancer, 43, 1564–1573.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Whistance, R. N., Conroy, T., Chie, W., Costantini, A., Sezer, O., Koller, M., et al. (2009). Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 45, 3017–3026.CrossRefPubMed Whistance, R. N., Conroy, T., Chie, W., Costantini, A., Sezer, O., Koller, M., et al. (2009). Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 45, 3017–3026.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nowak, W., Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B., Brzyski, P., Sałówka, J., Kuliś, D., & Richter, P. (2011). Adaptation of quality of life module EORTC QLQ-CR29 for Polish patients with rectal cancer: initial assessment of validity and reliability. Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny, 83, 502–510.CrossRefPubMed Nowak, W., Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B., Brzyski, P., Sałówka, J., Kuliś, D., & Richter, P. (2011). Adaptation of quality of life module EORTC QLQ-CR29 for Polish patients with rectal cancer: initial assessment of validity and reliability. Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny, 83, 502–510.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Arraras, J. I., Suárez, J., de la Vega, F. A., Vera, R., Asín, G., Arrazubi, V., et al. (2011). The EORTC quality of Life questionnaire for patients with colorectal cancer: EORTC QLQ-CR29 validation study for Spanish patients. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 13, 50–56.CrossRefPubMed Arraras, J. I., Suárez, J., de la Vega, F. A., Vera, R., Asín, G., Arrazubi, V., et al. (2011). The EORTC quality of Life questionnaire for patients with colorectal cancer: EORTC QLQ-CR29 validation study for Spanish patients. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 13, 50–56.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Thaysen, H. V., Jess, P., Laurberg, S., & Groenvold, M. (2012). Validation of the Danish version of the disease specific instrument EORTC QLQ-CR38 to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes., 10, 150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thaysen, H. V., Jess, P., Laurberg, S., & Groenvold, M. (2012). Validation of the Danish version of the disease specific instrument EORTC QLQ-CR38 to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes., 10, 150.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Dewolf, L., Koller, M., Velikova, G., Johnson, C., Scott, N., & Andrew Bottomley on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. (2009). EORTC quality of life group translation procedure. Brussels: EORTC. Dewolf, L., Koller, M., Velikova, G., Johnson, C., Scott, N., & Andrew Bottomley on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. (2009). EORTC quality of life group translation procedure. Brussels: EORTC.
8.
go back to reference Peeters, K. C., van de Velde, C. J., Leer, J. W., Martijn, H., Junggeburt, J. M., Kranenbarg, E. K., et al. (2005). Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients: A Dutch colorectal cancer group study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 6199–6206.CrossRefPubMed Peeters, K. C., van de Velde, C. J., Leer, J. W., Martijn, H., Junggeburt, J. M., Kranenbarg, E. K., et al. (2005). Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients: A Dutch colorectal cancer group study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 6199–6206.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kunneman, M., Marijnen, C. A., Rozema, T., Ceha, H. M., Grootenboers, D. A., Neelis, K. J., et al. (2015). Decision consultations on preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: large variation in benefits and harms that are addressed. British Journal of Cancer, 112, 39–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kunneman, M., Marijnen, C. A., Rozema, T., Ceha, H. M., Grootenboers, D. A., Neelis, K. J., et al. (2015). Decision consultations on preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: large variation in benefits and harms that are addressed. British Journal of Cancer, 112, 39–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Kleinbaum, D. G., & Kupper, L. L. (1978). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Boston, MA: Duxbury Press. Kleinbaum, D. G., & Kupper, L. L. (1978). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Boston, MA: Duxbury Press.
Metadata
Title
The EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaire for colorectal cancer: validation of the Dutch version
Authors
A. M. Stiggelbout
M. Kunneman
M. C. M. Baas-Thijssen
P. A. Neijenhuis
A. K. Loor
S. Jägers
R. Vree
C. A. M. Marijnen
A. H. Pieterse
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1210-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Quality of Life Research 7/2016 Go to the issue