Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 6/2010

01-08-2010

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

Authors: Linda S. Deal, Valerie S. L. Williams, Dana Britt DiBenedetti, Sheri E. Fehnel

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and psychometrically evaluate the Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, a patient-reported assessment of satisfaction with endometriosis treatment.

Methods

The Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire was developed based on the results of five focus groups and three iterative sets of cognitive interviews along with expert opinion and a review of the literature. The psychometric properties were assessed using data collected during a multicenter, randomized, proof-of-concept trial. The development and validation processes followed the guidance recommended by the United States FDA for patient-reported outcome instruments.

Results

The Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire’s reliability, validity, and utility as a measure of patient satisfaction with their endometriosis treatment were supported. The results of the item-level analyses showed no evidence of distributional anomalies or response scale biases. The Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire is unidimensional, has excellent internal consistency reliability, and discriminates well between known groups. Scores correlated well with other patient-reported outcome measures of endometriosis without being redundant.

Conclusions

The Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire has utility for assessing patient satisfaction with endometriosis treatment and may be useful in clinical trials that are assessing new treatments for endometriosis, especially when deciding between competing treatments or regimens that are found to have similar tolerability and efficacy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gao, X., Outley, J., Botteman, M., et al. (2006). Economic burden of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility, 86, 1561–1572.CrossRefPubMed Gao, X., Outley, J., Botteman, M., et al. (2006). Economic burden of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility, 86, 1561–1572.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference D’Hooghe, T., & Hummelshoj, L. (2006). Multi-disciplinary centres/networks of excellence for endometriosis management and research: A proposal. Human Reproduction, 21, 2743–2748.CrossRefPubMed D’Hooghe, T., & Hummelshoj, L. (2006). Multi-disciplinary centres/networks of excellence for endometriosis management and research: A proposal. Human Reproduction, 21, 2743–2748.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Atkinson, M. J., Sinha, A., Hass, S. L., et al. (2004). Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 12.CrossRefPubMed Atkinson, M. J., Sinha, A., Hass, S. L., et al. (2004). Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 12.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Weaver, M., Patrick, D. L., Markson, L. E., et al. (1997). Issues in the measurement of satisfaction with treatment. American Journal of Managed Care, 3, 579–594.PubMed Weaver, M., Patrick, D. L., Markson, L. E., et al. (1997). Issues in the measurement of satisfaction with treatment. American Journal of Managed Care, 3, 579–594.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Biberoglu, K. O., & Behrman, S. J. (1981). Dosage aspects of danazol therapy in endometriosis: short-term and long-term effectiveness. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 139, 645–654.PubMed Biberoglu, K. O., & Behrman, S. J. (1981). Dosage aspects of danazol therapy in endometriosis: short-term and long-term effectiveness. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 139, 645–654.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Jones, G., Kennedy, S., Barnard, A., et al. (2001). Development of an endometriosis quality-of-life instrument: The endometriosis health profile-30. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 98, 258–264.CrossRefPubMed Jones, G., Kennedy, S., Barnard, A., et al. (2001). Development of an endometriosis quality-of-life instrument: The endometriosis health profile-30. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 98, 258–264.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jones, G. L., Jenkinson, C., & Kennedy, S. (2004). Evaluating the responsiveness of the endometriosis health profile questionnaire: The EHP-30. Quality of Life Research, 13, 705–713.CrossRefPubMed Jones, G. L., Jenkinson, C., & Kennedy, S. (2004). Evaluating the responsiveness of the endometriosis health profile questionnaire: The EHP-30. Quality of Life Research, 13, 705–713.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 294–334. Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 294–334.
10.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
go back to reference MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., et al. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.CrossRef MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., et al. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference SAS Institute Inc. (2005). SAS proprietary software, version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. SAS Institute Inc. (2005). SAS proprietary software, version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
13.
go back to reference Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press. Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Metadata
Title
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire
Authors
Linda S. Deal
Valerie S. L. Williams
Dana Britt DiBenedetti
Sheri E. Fehnel
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9640-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Quality of Life Research 6/2010 Go to the issue