Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Prevention Science 3/2019

01-04-2019

Ensuring Causal, Not Casual, Inference

Authors: Rashelle J. Musci, Elizabeth Stuart

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

With innovation in causal inference methods and a rise in non-experimental data availability, a growing number of prevention researchers and advocates are thinking about causal inference. In this commentary, we discuss the current state of science as it relates to causal inference in prevention research, and reflect on key assumptions of these methods. We review challenges associated with the use of causal inference methodology, as well as considerations for hoping to integrate causal inference methods into their research. In short, this commentary addresses the key concepts of causal inference and suggests a greater emphasis on thoughtfully designed studies (to avoid the need for strong and potentially untestable assumptions) combined with analyses of sensitivity to those assumptions.
Literature
go back to reference Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–455.CrossRef Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–455.CrossRef
go back to reference Bray, B.C., Dziak, J.J., Oatrick, M.E., and Lanza, S. T. (2018). Inverse propensity score weighting with a latent class exposure: Estimating the causal effect of reported reasons for alcohol use on problem alcohol use 16 years later. Prevention Science. Bray, B.C., Dziak, J.J., Oatrick, M.E., and Lanza, S. T. (2018). Inverse propensity score weighting with a latent class exposure: Estimating the causal effect of reported reasons for alcohol use on problem alcohol use 16 years later. Prevention Science.
go back to reference Ding, M., Chen, Y., & Bressler, S. L. (2006). Granger causality: Basic theory and application to neuroscience. In Handbook of Time Series Analysis: Recent Theoretical Developments and Applications (pp. 437–460). Ding, M., Chen, Y., & Bressler, S. L. (2006). Granger causality: Basic theory and application to neuroscience. In Handbook of Time Series Analysis: Recent Theoretical Developments and Applications (pp. 437–460).
go back to reference Holland, P. W. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equations models. In Sociological Methodology (volume 18, pp. 449–484). American Sociological Association. Holland, P. W. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equations models. In Sociological Methodology (volume 18, pp. 449–484). American Sociological Association.
go back to reference Imbens, G.W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge University Press. Imbens, G.W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Kelcey, B., Spybrook, J., & Dong, N. (2018). Sample size planning for cluster-randomized interventions probing multilevel mediation. Prevention Science. Kelcey, B., Spybrook, J., & Dong, N. (2018). Sample size planning for cluster-randomized interventions probing multilevel mediation. Prevention Science.
go back to reference Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877–883.CrossRefPubMed Kraemer, H. C., Wilson, G. T., Fairburn, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (2002). Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 877–883.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rosenbaum, P. R. (2005). Sensitivity analysis in observational studies. In Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science (pp. 1809–1814). Rosenbaum, P. R. (2005). Sensitivity analysis in observational studies. In Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science (pp. 1809–1814).
go back to reference Rosenbaum, P. R. (2017). Observation and experiment: An introduction to causal inference. Harvard University Press. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2017). Observation and experiment: An introduction to causal inference. Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRef Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.CrossRef Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.CrossRef
go back to reference Rubin, D. B. (2008). For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2, 808–840.CrossRef Rubin, D. B. (2008). For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2, 808–840.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ensuring Causal, Not Casual, Inference
Authors
Rashelle J. Musci
Elizabeth Stuart
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Prevention Science / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0971-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Prevention Science 3/2019 Go to the issue