Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pituitary 3/2016

Open Access 01-06-2016

Incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in a large US health plan database

Authors: Tanya Burton, Elisabeth Le Nestour, Maureen Neary, William H. Ludlam

Published in: Pituitary | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Incidence and prevalence estimates of acromegaly in the United States (US) are limited. Most existing reports are based on European data sources. The objective of this study was to estimate the annual incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in a large US managed care population, overall and stratified by age, sex, and geographic region, using data from 2008 to 2012.

Methods

Using administrative claims data, commercial health plan enrollees were identified with acromegaly if they had two or more medical claims with an acromegaly diagnosis code (ICD-9-CM: 253.0×) or one medical claim with an acromegaly diagnosis code in combination with one other claim for a pituitary tumor or pituitary procedure. The first date for an acromegaly-related claim set the index year. Incidence rates for each year were calculated by dividing the number of new acromegaly cases by the calculated person-time at risk. Annual prevalence estimates were calculated by dividing the number with any evidence of acromegaly by the total number of health plan enrollees enrolled for at least 1 day during each calendar year. Incidence and prevalence estimates were stratified by age (0–17, 18–44, 45–64, 65+ years), sex (male, female), and US geographic region of the health plan (Midwest, Northeast, South, West).

Results

Overall annual incidence rates of acromegaly were relatively constant across 2008–2012 with ~11 cases per million person-years (PMPY). Rates increased with age, ranging from 3–8 cases PMPY among children aged 0–17 years old to 9–18 cases PMPY among adults aged 65 and older. Females had 12 cases PMPY on average compared to 10 cases PMPY among men. On average, the Midwest had the lowest incidence rates (7 cases PMPY) compared to the Northeast, South and West (14, 12, and 10 cases PMPY, respectively). The overall annual prevalence of acromegaly was relatively constant across the 5 years from 2008 to 2012 with approximately 78 cases per million each year. Annual prevalence estimates increased with age, ranging from 29–37 cases per million among children aged 0–17 years old to 148–182 cases per million among adults aged 65 years and older. Males and females were similarly affected; each with approximately 77 cases per million each year. The Northeast and South had the highest prevalence estimates (92 and 89 cases per million, respectively); while the estimates for the West and Midwest were lower (65 and 57 cases per million, respectively) each year.

Conclusion

This study examined 5 years of recent data to estimate the incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in a large geographically-diverse managed care population. The incidence rates were higher on average than published rates outside the US (11 vs. 3.3 PMPY), but prevalence estimates were consistent with previous reports. Incidence and prevalence both increased by age, did not differ for males and females, and varied slightly by US geographic region. The age and sex distribution of the selected population matched the known epidemiology of the disease. Using a claims-based approach, this analysis only captured acromegaly cases with an acromegaly-related medical claim. As a result, these estimates may underestimate the incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in US commercial health plans as they did not include individuals who were undiagnosed, in remission, undertreated, or not monitored during the study period. At the same time, these estimates may be viewed as an upper bound on the incidence of acromegaly in the US as the estimates did not include individuals who were in other health plans or uninsured during the study period. Additional evaluations are needed to identify the full extent of acromegaly in the US.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Alexander L, Appleton D, Hall R, Ross WM, Wilkinson R (1980) Epidemiology of acromegaly in the Newcastle region. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 12(1):71–79CrossRef Alexander L, Appleton D, Hall R, Ross WM, Wilkinson R (1980) Epidemiology of acromegaly in the Newcastle region. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 12(1):71–79CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bengtsson BA, Edén S, Ernest I, Odén A, Sjögren B (1988) Epidemiology and long-term survival in acromegaly. a study of 166 cases diagnosed between 1955 and 1984. Acta Med Scand 223(4):327–335CrossRefPubMed Bengtsson BA, Edén S, Ernest I, Odén A, Sjögren B (1988) Epidemiology and long-term survival in acromegaly. a study of 166 cases diagnosed between 1955 and 1984. Acta Med Scand 223(4):327–335CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Etxabe J, Gaztambide S, Latorre P, Vazquez JA (1993) Acromegaly: an epidemiological study. J Endocrinol Invest 16(3):181–187CrossRefPubMed Etxabe J, Gaztambide S, Latorre P, Vazquez JA (1993) Acromegaly: an epidemiological study. J Endocrinol Invest 16(3):181–187CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mestron A, Webb SM, Astorga R, Benito P, Catala M, Gaztambide S et al (2004) Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcome, morbidity and mortality in acromegaly based on the Spanish acromegaly registry (registro espanol de acromegalia, REA). Eur J Endocrinol 151(4):439–446CrossRefPubMed Mestron A, Webb SM, Astorga R, Benito P, Catala M, Gaztambide S et al (2004) Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcome, morbidity and mortality in acromegaly based on the Spanish acromegaly registry (registro espanol de acromegalia, REA). Eur J Endocrinol 151(4):439–446CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bex M, Abs R, T’Sjoen G, Mockel J, Velkeniers B, Muermans K et al (2007) AcroBel—the Belgian registry on acromegaly: a survey of the ‘real-life’ outcome in 418 acromegalic subjects. Eur J Endocrinol 157(4):399–409CrossRefPubMed Bex M, Abs R, T’Sjoen G, Mockel J, Velkeniers B, Muermans K et al (2007) AcroBel—the Belgian registry on acromegaly: a survey of the ‘real-life’ outcome in 418 acromegalic subjects. Eur J Endocrinol 157(4):399–409CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ko GT, Yeung VT, Chow CC, Cockram CS (1999) Clinical characteristics of acromegaly in Hong Kong. Endocr Res 25(2):195–206CrossRefPubMed Ko GT, Yeung VT, Chow CC, Cockram CS (1999) Clinical characteristics of acromegaly in Hong Kong. Endocr Res 25(2):195–206CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kauppinen-Mäkelin R, Sane T, Reunanen A, Välimäki MJ, Niskanen L, Markkanen H et al (2005) A nationwide survey of mortality in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90(7):4081–4086CrossRefPubMed Kauppinen-Mäkelin R, Sane T, Reunanen A, Välimäki MJ, Niskanen L, Markkanen H et al (2005) A nationwide survey of mortality in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90(7):4081–4086CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in a large US health plan database
Authors
Tanya Burton
Elisabeth Le Nestour
Maureen Neary
William H. Ludlam
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pituitary / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1386-341X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7403
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0701-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Pituitary 3/2016 Go to the issue