Comparing remifentanil and sufentanil in stress reduction during neurosurgery: a randomised controlled trial

Background In most scenarios, anaesthesiologists titrate opioids to control nociceptive surgical stress based on intraoperative haemodynamic changes. Remifentanil was reported to cause more profound cardiovascular depression than sufentanil. A concern is that this direct cardiovascular depression might counteract the hypertension and tachycardia caused by surgical manipulation and mask inadequate analgesia. Objective To compare remifentanil and sufentanil, titrated to maintain a comparable haemodynamic range (within 20% of baseline) and combined with the same propofol regimen, in stress reduction measured as plasma levels of putative mediators of surgical stress. Setting Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Method Forty-five patients undergoing supratentorial glioma resection were randomised to the remifentanil group or the sufentanil group. Main outcome measures Plasma concentrations of cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine, interleukin-6, interleukin-10 and lymphocyte counts were analysed before anaesthesia, 1 h after incision, at the end of surgery and 24 h after incision using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and an automatic haematology analyser. Recovery profiles during emergence from anaesthesia were also compared. Results Except for a lower epinephrine concentration in the remifentanil group 24 h after incision (median [interquartile range], 4.2 [3.4–6.1] vs. 8.4 [4.8–12.5] ng/ml; P = 0.003), stress biomarkers were not significantly different between the two groups. Patients in the sufentanil group had lower grades in coughing, restlessness (P = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively) and a lower incidence of postoperative shivering (P = 0.007). Conclusion Compared to that of sufentanil, the direct cardiovascular depression of remifentanil does not mask the clinical manifestation of inadequate analgesia when both drugs are titrated according to haemodynamic variables in neurosurgery.