Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 4/2020

Open Access 01-08-2020 | Research Article

A survey of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy members’ research involvement, and associated enablers and barriers

Authors: Derek Stewart, Vibhu Paudyal, Cathal Cadogan, Ankie Hazen, Betul Okuyan, Monika Lutters, Martin Henman, Daniella Fialová

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background Building research capacity of European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) members aligns to the organisation’s aim of advancing research. Objective To determine members’ aspirations and needs in research training and practice, and to explore ways in which ESCP could provide support. Setting ESCP’s international membership. Method Cross-sectional survey of members in 2018, followed by focus groups with samples of respondents attending an ESCP symposium. Survey items were: research activities; interests, experience and confidence; and Likert statements on research conduct. Principal component analysis (PCA) clustering of Likert statements from a previous study was used, with scores for each component calculated. Focus groups discussed barriers to research and how ESCP could provide support. Data analysis involved collating and comparing all themes. Main outcome measures Research interest, experience and confidence; attitudinal items; barriers to research; ESCP support. Results The response rate was 16.7% (83/499), with 89.2% (n = 74) involved in research and 79.5% (n = 66) publishing research in the preceding 2 years. While overwhelmingly positive, responses were more positive for research interest than experience or confidence. PCA component scores (support/opportunities, motivation/outcomes, and roles/characteristics) were positive. Thirteen members participated in focus groups, identifying barriers of: insufficient collaboration; lack of knowledge, skills, training; unsupportive environment; insufficient time; and limited resources. ESCP could support through mentorship, collaboration, education and funding. Conclusion Study participants were highly active, interested, experienced, confident and positive regarding research. There is an opportunity for ESCP to harness these activities and provide support in the form of mentoring, education and training, and facilitating collaboration.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tan EC, Stewart K, Elliott RA, George J. Pharmacist services provided in general practice clinics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014;10:608–22.CrossRef Tan EC, Stewart K, Elliott RA, George J. Pharmacist services provided in general practice clinics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014;10:608–22.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hazen ACM, de Bont AA, Boelman L, Zwart DL, De Gier JJ, De Wit NJ, et al. The degree of integration of non-dispensing pharmacists in primary care practice and the impact on health outcomes: a systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018;14:228–40.CrossRef Hazen ACM, de Bont AA, Boelman L, Zwart DL, De Gier JJ, De Wit NJ, et al. The degree of integration of non-dispensing pharmacists in primary care practice and the impact on health outcomes: a systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018;14:228–40.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stewart D, Jebara T, Cunningham S, Awaisu A, Pallivalapila A, MacLure K, et al. Future perspectives on nonmedical prescribing. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2017;8:183–97.CrossRef Stewart D, Jebara T, Cunningham S, Awaisu A, Pallivalapila A, MacLure K, et al. Future perspectives on nonmedical prescribing. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2017;8:183–97.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Weeks G, George J, Maclure K, Stewart D. Non-medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.PubMed Weeks G, George J, Maclure K, Stewart D. Non-medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011227.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine. BMJ. 1996;313:170–1.CrossRef Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine. BMJ. 1996;313:170–1.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Awaisu A, Alsalimy N. Pharmacists’ involvement in and attitudes toward pharmacy practice research: a systematic review of the literature. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2015;11:725–48.CrossRef Awaisu A, Alsalimy N. Pharmacists’ involvement in and attitudes toward pharmacy practice research: a systematic review of the literature. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2015;11:725–48.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stewart D, Cunningham S, Strath A, MacLure A, Gibson-Smith K, Rushworth GF, et al. A theoretically informed survey of the views and experiences of practicing pharmacists on research conduct, dissemination and translation. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2019;15:1298–308.CrossRef Stewart D, Cunningham S, Strath A, MacLure A, Gibson-Smith K, Rushworth GF, et al. A theoretically informed survey of the views and experiences of practicing pharmacists on research conduct, dissemination and translation. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2019;15:1298–308.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.CrossRef Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;2:38.CrossRef Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;2:38.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 2003 (ISBN 9780743222099). Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 2003 (ISBN 9780743222099).
14.
go back to reference Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jorstad S, Gates S, Lamb SE. Maximising response to questionnaires—a systematic review of randomised trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:5.CrossRef Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jorstad S, Gates S, Lamb SE. Maximising response to questionnaires—a systematic review of randomised trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. New York: Sage; 1991 (ISBN 9781412980449). DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. New York: Sage; 1991 (ISBN 9781412980449).
16.
go back to reference Pallant J. SPSS survival manual. London: McGraw-Hill Education; 2013. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual. London: McGraw-Hill Education; 2013.
17.
go back to reference Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. Sage Open. 2014;4:1–10.CrossRef Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. Sage Open. 2014;4:1–10.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Harvey D, Plummer D, Pighills A, Pain T. Practitioner research capacity: a survey of social workers in Northern Queensland. Aust Soc Work. 2013;66:540–54.CrossRef Harvey D, Plummer D, Pighills A, Pain T. Practitioner research capacity: a survey of social workers in Northern Queensland. Aust Soc Work. 2013;66:540–54.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pager S, Holden L, Golenko X. Motivators, enablers, and barriers to building allied health research capacity. J Multidiscip Health. 2012;5:53–9.CrossRef Pager S, Holden L, Golenko X. Motivators, enablers, and barriers to building allied health research capacity. J Multidiscip Health. 2012;5:53–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Finch E, Cornwell P, Ward EC, McPhail SM. Factors influencing research engagement: research interest, confidence and experience in an Australian speechlanguage pathology workforce. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:144.CrossRef Finch E, Cornwell P, Ward EC, McPhail SM. Factors influencing research engagement: research interest, confidence and experience in an Australian speechlanguage pathology workforce. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:144.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Salmon P, Peters S, Rogers A, Gask L, Clifford R, Iredale W, et al. Peering through the barriers in GPs’ explanations for declining to participate in research: the role of professional autonomy and the economy of time. Fam Pract. 2007;24:269.CrossRef Salmon P, Peters S, Rogers A, Gask L, Clifford R, Iredale W, et al. Peering through the barriers in GPs’ explanations for declining to participate in research: the role of professional autonomy and the economy of time. Fam Pract. 2007;24:269.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference McMaster R, Jammali-Blasi A, Andersson-Noorgard K, Cooper K, McInnes E. Research involvement, support needs, and factors affecting research participation: a survey of Mental Health Consultation Liaison Nurses. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2013;22:154–61.CrossRef McMaster R, Jammali-Blasi A, Andersson-Noorgard K, Cooper K, McInnes E. Research involvement, support needs, and factors affecting research participation: a survey of Mental Health Consultation Liaison Nurses. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2013;22:154–61.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95.CrossRef Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Michie S, Wood CE, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data). Health Technol Assess. 2015;2015:19. Michie S, Wood CE, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data). Health Technol Assess. 2015;2015:19.
Metadata
Title
A survey of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy members’ research involvement, and associated enablers and barriers
Authors
Derek Stewart
Vibhu Paudyal
Cathal Cadogan
Ankie Hazen
Betul Okuyan
Monika Lutters
Martin Henman
Daniella Fialová
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01054-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 4/2020 Go to the issue