Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 6/2019

01-12-2019 | Care | Research Article

Assessing risk of adverse drug reactions in the elderly: a feasibility study

Authors: Andrew Ridge, Kate Macintyre, Alex Kitsos, Linda Murray, Luke Bereznicki

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background Adverse drug reactions are common in Australian general practice and can be a cause of, or contribute to, preventable hospital admissions. Developing practical tools to assist in identifying patients who are at high risk of serious adverse drug reactions is an important step in preventing these hospitalisations. Objective The aims of the study were to apply the Prediction of Hospitalisation due to Adverse Drug Reactions in Elderly Community-Dwelling Patients (PADR-EC) Score to assess the risk of medication-related hospitalisation among patients aged ≥ 65 years attending a rural general practice, and to investigate general practitioners’ acceptance of the PADR-EC Score. Setting The project was based in a multicentre rural general practice in southern Tasmania, Australia. Method We conducted a cross-sectional study wherein the PADR-EC score was administered to patients aged ≥ 65 years attending a general practice. A focus group of general practice doctors was conducted and thematic analysis of the transcript used to explore their views regarding the utility of the PADR-EC score. Main Outcome Measures Successful application of the PADR-EC Score and an evaluation of general practitioners' acceptance of the PADR-EC Score are the two outcome measures of the project. Results The PADR-EC score was applied by the practice pharmacist and reported to GPs for 428 patients aged ≥ 65 years, with 24.8% classified as high-risk. The focus group found the PADR-EC score helped raise awareness of the risk of adverse drug reactions in the general practice setting. Doctors demonstrated good understanding of the PADR-EC Score and there were no negative reactions to the delivery model used. No changes to prescribing were implemented directly as a result of the PADR-EC Score, but more caution was used when doctors provided their usual clinical care. Conclusion Doctors used the PADR-EC score to complement their decision making. The PADR-EC Score was used as a reminder to review existing medication lists, follow-up on pathology results that may impact drug treatment and assess patients for prevalent ADRs. Further research is needed to validate the PADR-EC score in this setting.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Health 2016. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2016. Contract No.: ISBN 978-1-74249-924-6 (PDF). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Health 2016. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2016. Contract No.: ISBN 978-1-74249-924-6 (PDF).
3.
go back to reference Elliott R. Problems with medication use in the elderly: an Australian perspective. J Pharm Pract Res. 2006;36(1):58–66.CrossRef Elliott R. Problems with medication use in the elderly: an Australian perspective. J Pharm Pract Res. 2006;36(1):58–66.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Parekh N, Ali K, Stevenson JM, Graham Davies J, Schiff R, Van der Cammen T, et al. Incidence and cost of medication harm in older adults following hospital discharge: a multicentre prospective study in the UK. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(8):1789–97.CrossRef Parekh N, Ali K, Stevenson JM, Graham Davies J, Schiff R, Van der Cammen T, et al. Incidence and cost of medication harm in older adults following hospital discharge: a multicentre prospective study in the UK. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(8):1789–97.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mazzaglia G, Roti L, Corsini G, Colombini A, Maciocco G, Marchionni N, et al. Screening of older community-dwelling people at risk for death and hospitalization: the Assistenza Socio-Sanitaria in Italia project. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(12):1955–60.CrossRef Mazzaglia G, Roti L, Corsini G, Colombini A, Maciocco G, Marchionni N, et al. Screening of older community-dwelling people at risk for death and hospitalization: the Assistenza Socio-Sanitaria in Italia project. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(12):1955–60.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Roughhead L, Semple S, Rosenfeld E. Literature review: medication safety in Australia. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2013. Roughhead L, Semple S, Rosenfeld E. Literature review: medication safety in Australia. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2013.
7.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Admitted patient care 2016–2017: Australian hospital statistics. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2018. Contract No.: ISBN 978-1-76054-347-1 (PDF). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Admitted patient care 2016–2017: Australian hospital statistics. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2018. Contract No.: ISBN 978-1-76054-347-1 (PDF).
8.
go back to reference Nair NP, Chalmers L, Peterson GM, Bereznicki BJ, Castelino RL, Bereznicki LR. Hospitalization in older patients due to adverse drug reactions: the need for a prediction tool. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:497–505.CrossRef Nair NP, Chalmers L, Peterson GM, Bereznicki BJ, Castelino RL, Bereznicki LR. Hospitalization in older patients due to adverse drug reactions: the need for a prediction tool. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:497–505.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nair NP, Chalmers L, Connolly M, Bereznicki BJ, Peterson GM, Curtain C, et al. Prediction of hospitalization due to adverse drug reactions in elderly community-dwelling patients (The PADR-EC score). PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0165757.CrossRef Nair NP, Chalmers L, Connolly M, Bereznicki BJ, Peterson GM, Curtain C, et al. Prediction of hospitalization due to adverse drug reactions in elderly community-dwelling patients (The PADR-EC score). PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0165757.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.CrossRef Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hesse-Biber SN. Mixed methods research: merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2010. p. c2010. Hesse-Biber SN. Mixed methods research: merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2010. p. c2010.
15.
go back to reference QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo 10. 10 ed. 2014. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo 10. 10 ed. 2014.
16.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference O’Connor MN, Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. Inappropriate prescribing. Drugs Aging. 2012;29(6):437–52.CrossRef O’Connor MN, Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. Inappropriate prescribing. Drugs Aging. 2012;29(6):437–52.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions): application to acutely ill elderly patients and comparison with Beers’ criteria. Age Ageing. 2008;37(6):673–9.CrossRef Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions): application to acutely ill elderly patients and comparison with Beers’ criteria. Age Ageing. 2008;37(6):673–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Price M, Davies I, Rusk R, Lesperance M, Weber J. Applying STOPP guidelines in primary care through electronic medical record decision support: randomized control trial highlighting the importance of data quality. JMIR Med Inf. 2017;5(2):38–48. Price M, Davies I, Rusk R, Lesperance M, Weber J. Applying STOPP guidelines in primary care through electronic medical record decision support: randomized control trial highlighting the importance of data quality. JMIR Med Inf. 2017;5(2):38–48.
20.
go back to reference Dimitrow MS, Airaksinen MS, Kivelä SL, Lyles A, Leikola SN. Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(8):1521–30.CrossRef Dimitrow MS, Airaksinen MS, Kivelä SL, Lyles A, Leikola SN. Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(8):1521–30.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessing risk of adverse drug reactions in the elderly: a feasibility study
Authors
Andrew Ridge
Kate Macintyre
Alex Kitsos
Linda Murray
Luke Bereznicki
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Care
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00908-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 6/2019 Go to the issue