Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 4/2019

01-08-2019 | Rituximab | Research Article

Use of non-formulary high-cost medicines in an Australian public hospital

Authors: Joshua M. Inglis, Gillian E. Caughey, Sepehr Shakib

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background Clinicians prescribe high-cost medicines for rare diseases and nonapproved indications when conventional therapies have failed. Objective To examine the use of non-formulary high-cost medicines at an Australian public hospital. Methods Retrospective audit of individual patient use applications for nonformulary medicines costing more than $5000 AUD per year at a large tertiary referral hospital in Adelaide, South Australia over a 12-month study period from January 2015 to December 2015. Main outcome measures Total cost of non-formulary high-cost medicines, medication class, indications for use, level of supporting evidence and proposed monitoring outcomes. Results Eighty-seven individual patient use applications were examined. All except one were approved, at a total cost of $1,339,203 AUD. The most common drug classes were anti-CD20 (n = 33, 38%), combined antiretrovirals (n = 10, 11%) and TNF-alpha antagonists (n = 10, 11%). There were 56 indications for these medicines with the majority being inflammatory conditions (n = 52, 60%), followed by infections (n = 14, 16%) and malignancies (n = 14, 16%). Of the first-time individual patient use applications (n = 63), there were 25 applications (40%) that provided a case series as supporting evidence. Approximately half of new individual patient use applications (n = 32) proposed an objective monitoring outcome, but few (n = 13, 21%) contained sufficient information to allow a third party to determine efficacy of the medication. Conclusions Non-formulary high-cost medicines are being used for a broad range of indications based largely on low levels of evidence. Prospective definition of an adequate response to treatment and reporting of these outcomes is required to improve the evidence-base and to aid decision-making for subsequent treatment courses.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Victorian Therapeutic Advisory Group VicTAG. Hospital price and resource allocation review: good practice model for controlling medicines costs in hospitals. Melbourne: Victorian Therapeutics Advisory Group; 2004. Victorian Therapeutic Advisory Group VicTAG. Hospital price and resource allocation review: good practice model for controlling medicines costs in hospitals. Melbourne: Victorian Therapeutics Advisory Group; 2004.
3.
go back to reference Tan EL, Day RO, Brien JE. Drug and therapeutics committees — are they fulfilling their potential to improve the quality use of medicines? Int J Pharm Pract. 2003;11(3):175–81.CrossRef Tan EL, Day RO, Brien JE. Drug and therapeutics committees — are they fulfilling their potential to improve the quality use of medicines? Int J Pharm Pract. 2003;11(3):175–81.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gallego G, Melocco T, Taylor S, Brien J. Impact of high-cost drugs for individual patient use. J Pharm Pract Res. 2004;34:100–3.CrossRef Gallego G, Melocco T, Taylor S, Brien J. Impact of high-cost drugs for individual patient use. J Pharm Pract Res. 2004;34:100–3.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis–oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica. 1978;157(4):238–44.CrossRef Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis–oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica. 1978;157(4):238–44.CrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Australian Government Department of Health. Guidelines for preparing a submission to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Canberra 2016. Australian Government Department of Health. Guidelines for preparing a submission to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Canberra 2016.
20.
go back to reference Green JA, Chawla AK, Fong PA. Evaluating a restrictive formulary system by assessing nonformulary-drug requests. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985;42(7):1537–41.PubMed Green JA, Chawla AK, Fong PA. Evaluating a restrictive formulary system by assessing nonformulary-drug requests. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985;42(7):1537–41.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Use of non-formulary high-cost medicines in an Australian public hospital
Authors
Joshua M. Inglis
Gillian E. Caughey
Sepehr Shakib
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00853-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 4/2019 Go to the issue