Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 4/2018

Open Access 01-08-2018 | Commentary

Pharmacovigilance workflow in Europe and Italy and pharmacovigilance terminology

Authors: Paolo Baldo, Sara Francescon, Giulia Fornasier

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The terminology used in pharmacovigilance can cause confusion, because there are similar terms that describe different phenomena (e.g. adverse reactions, adverse drug reactions, and side effects). Incorrect use of terminology can have negative effects on the reporting of adverse drug reactions and on the interpretation of these reports. To explain the most common terms used in pharmacovigilance, this article first describes the pharmacovigilance workflow process in the European Union and, as an example, in Italy. Then, the article reviews common pharmacovigilance terms.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Palaian S, Ibrahim MI, Mishra P. Health professionals’ knowledge, attitude and practices towards pharmacovigilance in Nepal. Pharm Pract. 2011;9(4):228–35. Palaian S, Ibrahim MI, Mishra P. Health professionals’ knowledge, attitude and practices towards pharmacovigilance in Nepal. Pharm Pract. 2011;9(4):228–35.
2.
go back to reference Steurbaut S, Hanssens Y. Pharmacovigilance: empowering healthcare professionals and patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(5):859–62.CrossRef Steurbaut S, Hanssens Y. Pharmacovigilance: empowering healthcare professionals and patients. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(5):859–62.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lindquist M. The need for definitions in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2007;30(10):825–30.CrossRef Lindquist M. The need for definitions in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2007;30(10):825–30.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Baldo P, Fornasier G, Francescon S, Ferrarin E, Truccolo I, De Paoli P. Toxicities and adverse drug reactions experienced during anticancer treatment: it is desirable to consider the problem within the international system of pharmacovigilance. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2015;33(25):2824–5.CrossRef Baldo P, Fornasier G, Francescon S, Ferrarin E, Truccolo I, De Paoli P. Toxicities and adverse drug reactions experienced during anticancer treatment: it is desirable to consider the problem within the international system of pharmacovigilance. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2015;33(25):2824–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Baldo P, De Paoli P. Pharmacovigilance in oncology: evaluation of current practice and future perspectives. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(5):559–69.CrossRef Baldo P, De Paoli P. Pharmacovigilance in oncology: evaluation of current practice and future perspectives. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(5):559–69.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference CIOMS. Practical Aspects of Signal Detection in Pharmacovigilance: Report of CIOMS Working Group VIII. CIOMS, Geneva, 2010; p 14. CIOMS. Practical Aspects of Signal Detection in Pharmacovigilance: Report of CIOMS Working Group VIII. CIOMS, Geneva, 2010; p 14.
23.
go back to reference Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356(9237):1255–9.CrossRef Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2000;356(9237):1255–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pharmacovigilance workflow in Europe and Italy and pharmacovigilance terminology
Authors
Paolo Baldo
Sara Francescon
Giulia Fornasier
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0711-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 4/2018 Go to the issue