Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Short Research Report

Optimal timing for pegfilgrastim administration in Japanese breast cancer patients receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapies

Authors: Tatsuya Hayama, Kenichi Sakurai, Katsuhiro Miura, Shinsaku Washinosu, Shinya Tsuboi, Akihiro Uchiike, Yoshikazu Yoshida, Masami Takei

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background Pegfilgrastim is widely used for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN) in cancer patients receiving chemotherapies. However, the optimal timing of pegfilgrastim administration has not been established. Objective We investigated the effect of the timing of pegfilgrastim administration on the prevention of FN in patients with breast cancer undergoing intermediate-risk chemotherapies. Method We retrospectively analysed the incidence of FN in patients with breast cancer treated at our institution with intermediate-risk chemotherapies and primary or secondary prophylactic pegfilgrastim between 2015 and 2017. The impact of the timing of pegfilgrastim administration on the incidence of FN was evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results Overall, 87 patients received a total of 318 chemotherapy cycles with pegfilgrastim, and 14 patients (16%) experienced FN. In univariate analyses, day 2 pegfilgrastim administration, age of > 65 years, baseline haemoglobin < 12 g/dL, prior history of FN, and presence of recurrent/metastatic disease trended toward an association with FN. Adjustment for these confounding risk factors revealed that day 2 pegfilgrastim administration was associated with a significantly increased risk of FN (odds ratio 11.0, p = 0.009). Conclusion Administrating pegfilgrastim on day 3 or later may prevent FN more effectively among Japanese breast cancer patients receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH, Carson KR, Crawford J, Cross SJ, et al. Recommendations for the use of WBC growth factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3199–212.CrossRef Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH, Carson KR, Crawford J, Cross SJ, et al. Recommendations for the use of WBC growth factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3199–212.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN); The NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloid growth factors v2. 2017. October 13, 2017. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN); The NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloid growth factors v2. 2017. October 13, 2017.
3.
go back to reference Weycker D, Bensink M, Lonshteyn A, Doroff R, Chandler D. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by day of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice from 2010 to 2015. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33:2107–13.CrossRef Weycker D, Bensink M, Lonshteyn A, Doroff R, Chandler D. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by day of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice from 2010 to 2015. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33:2107–13.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shimizu T, Hirano A, Kamimura M, Ogura K, Kim N, Watanabe O, et al. A phase II study of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:4665–71.PubMed Shimizu T, Hirano A, Kamimura M, Ogura K, Kim N, Watanabe O, et al. A phase II study of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab as primary systemic therapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:4665–71.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim S-B, Im S-A, Hegg R, Im Y-H, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:109–19.CrossRef Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim S-B, Im S-A, Hegg R, Im Y-H, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:109–19.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Masaoka T. Evidence-based recommendations for antimicrobial use in febrile neutropenia in Japan: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(Suppl 1):S49–52.CrossRef Masaoka T. Evidence-based recommendations for antimicrobial use in febrile neutropenia in Japan: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(Suppl 1):S49–52.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Green MD. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:29–35.CrossRef Green MD. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:29–35.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zwick C, Hartmann F, Zeynalova S, Poschel V, Nickenig C, Reiser M, et al. Randomized comparison of pegfilgrastim day 4 versus day 2 for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced leukocytopenia. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1872–7.CrossRef Zwick C, Hartmann F, Zeynalova S, Poschel V, Nickenig C, Reiser M, et al. Randomized comparison of pegfilgrastim day 4 versus day 2 for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced leukocytopenia. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1872–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Loibl S, Mueller V, von Minckwitz G, Conrad B, Koehne CH, Kremers S, et al. Comparison of pegfilgrastim on day 2 vs. day 4 as primary prophylaxis of intense dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with node-positive primary breast cancer within the prospective, multi-center GAIN study: (GBG 33). Support Care Cancer. 2011;19:1789–95.CrossRef Loibl S, Mueller V, von Minckwitz G, Conrad B, Koehne CH, Kremers S, et al. Comparison of pegfilgrastim on day 2 vs. day 4 as primary prophylaxis of intense dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with node-positive primary breast cancer within the prospective, multi-center GAIN study: (GBG 33). Support Care Cancer. 2011;19:1789–95.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Masuda N, Tokuda Y, Nakamura S, Shimazaki R, Ito Y, Tamura K. Dose response of pegfilgrastim in Japanese breast cancer patients receiving six cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:2891–8.CrossRef Masuda N, Tokuda Y, Nakamura S, Shimazaki R, Ito Y, Tamura K. Dose response of pegfilgrastim in Japanese breast cancer patients receiving six cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:2891–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Optimal timing for pegfilgrastim administration in Japanese breast cancer patients receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapies
Authors
Tatsuya Hayama
Kenichi Sakurai
Katsuhiro Miura
Shinsaku Washinosu
Shinya Tsuboi
Akihiro Uchiike
Yoshikazu Yoshida
Masami Takei
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0667-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 5/2018 Go to the issue