Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 5/2017

01-10-2017 | Research Article

Redefining the pharmacology and pharmacy subject category in the journal citation reports using medical subject headings (MeSH)

Authors: Fernando Minguet, Teresa M. Salgado, Claudio Santopadre, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background The Journal Citation Reports (JCR) Pharmacology and Pharmacy subject category is heterogeneous. The inclusion of journals with basic and clinical scopes, which have different citation patterns, compromises comparability of impact factors among journals within the category. Objective To subdivide the Pharmacology and Pharmacy category into basic pharmacology, clinical pharmacology, and pharmacy based on the analyses of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as a proxy of journals’ scopes. Setting JCR. Method All articles, and respective MeSH, published in 2013, 2014, and 2015 in all journals included in the 2014 JCR Pharmacology and Pharmacy category were retrieved from PubMed. Several models using a combination of the 14 MeSH categories and specific MeSH tree branches were tested using hierarchical cluster analysis. Main outcome measure Distribution of journals across the subcategories of the JCR Pharmacology and Pharmacy subject category. Results A total of 107,847 articles from 214 journals were included. Nine different models combining the MeSH categories M (Persons) and N (Health Care) with specific MeSH tree branches (selected ad-hoc) and Pharmacy-specific MeSH (identified in previous research) consistently grouped 142 journals (66.4%) in homogeneous groups reflecting their basic and clinical pharmacology, and pharmacy scopes. Ultimately, journals were clustered into: 150 in basic pharmacology, 43 in clinical pharmacology, 16 in basic pharmacology and clinical pharmacology, and 5 in pharmacy. Conclusion The reformulation of the Pharmacology and Pharmacy category into three categories was demonstrated by the consistent results obtained from testing nine different clustering models using the MeSH terms assigned to their articles.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Lippi G. The impact factor for evaluating scientists: the good, the bad and the ugly. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:1585–6.PubMed Lippi G. The impact factor for evaluating scientists: the good, the bad and the ugly. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:1585–6.PubMed
4.
go back to reference The Monatstersky R, Science Number That’s Devouring. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2005;52:A12. The Monatstersky R, Science Number That’s Devouring. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2005;52:A12.
5.
go back to reference Not-so-deep impact. Nature. 2005;435:1003-4. Not-so-deep impact. Nature. 2005;435:1003-4.
7.
go back to reference Fernandez-Llimos F. Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016;14:842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fernandez-Llimos F. Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016;14:842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Dorta-Gonzalez P, Dorta-Gonzalez MI. Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalized impact factor. Scientometrics. 2013;95:645–72.CrossRef Dorta-Gonzalez P, Dorta-Gonzalez MI. Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalized impact factor. Scientometrics. 2013;95:645–72.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Waltman L, van Eck NJ, van Leeuwen TN, Visser MS, van Raan AFJ. Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis. Scientometrics. 2011;87:467–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Waltman L, van Eck NJ, van Leeuwen TN, Visser MS, van Raan AFJ. Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis. Scientometrics. 2011;87:467–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Morillo F, Bordons M, Gomez I. Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2003;54:1237–49.CrossRef Morillo F, Bordons M, Gomez I. Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2003;54:1237–49.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pudovkin AI, Garfield E. Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2002;53:1113–9.CrossRef Pudovkin AI, Garfield E. Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2002;53:1113–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Silcox B, Makar S, Ouimette M. Technology Services Reports: analysis of the Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology: National Institute of Standards and Technology 2005. Silcox B, Makar S, Ouimette M. Technology Services Reports: analysis of the Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology: National Institute of Standards and Technology 2005.
15.
go back to reference van Eck NJ, Waltman L, van Raan AF, Klautz RJ, Peul WC. Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e62395.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Eck NJ, Waltman L, van Raan AF, Klautz RJ, Peul WC. Citation analysis may severely underestimate the impact of clinical research as compared to basic research. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e62395.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Narin F, Hamilton KS. Bibliometric performance measures. Scientometrics. 1996;6:293–310.CrossRef Narin F, Hamilton KS. Bibliometric performance measures. Scientometrics. 1996;6:293–310.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Seglen PO. Bruk av siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder i evaluering av forskningsaktivitet. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989;31:3229–34. Seglen PO. Bruk av siteringsanalyse og andre bibliometriske metoder i evaluering av forskningsaktivitet. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989;31:3229–34.
18.
go back to reference Narin F, Pinski G, Gee HH. Structure of the biomedical literature. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1976;27:25–45.CrossRef Narin F, Pinski G, Gee HH. Structure of the biomedical literature. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1976;27:25–45.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Folly G, Hajtman B, Nagy JI, Ruff I. Some methodological problems in ranking scientists by citation analysis. Scientometrics. 1981;3:135–47.CrossRef Folly G, Hajtman B, Nagy JI, Ruff I. Some methodological problems in ranking scientists by citation analysis. Scientometrics. 1981;3:135–47.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Minguet F, Salgado TM, van den Boogerd L, Fernandez-Llimos F. Quality of pharmacy-specific Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) assignment in pharmacy journals indexed in MEDLINE. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015;11:686–95.CrossRefPubMed Minguet F, Salgado TM, van den Boogerd L, Fernandez-Llimos F. Quality of pharmacy-specific Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) assignment in pharmacy journals indexed in MEDLINE. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015;11:686–95.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Carpenter MP, Narin F. Clustering of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1973;24:425–36.CrossRef Carpenter MP, Narin F. Clustering of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1973;24:425–36.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Narin F, Carpenter MP. Clustering of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1973;24:425–35.CrossRef Narin F, Carpenter MP. Clustering of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1973;24:425–35.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Narin F, Carpenter MP, Berlt N. Interrelationships of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1972;23:323–31.CrossRef Narin F, Carpenter MP, Berlt N. Interrelationships of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inform Sci. 1972;23:323–31.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Small H, Sweeney E, Greenlee E. Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. II. Mapping science. Scientometrics. 1985;8:321–40. Small H, Sweeney E, Greenlee E. Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. II. Mapping science. Scientometrics. 1985;8:321–40.
27.
go back to reference Rafols I, Leydesdorff L. Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2009;60:1823–35.CrossRef Rafols I, Leydesdorff L. Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2009;60:1823–35.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Schvaneveldt RW, Dearholt DW, Durso FT. Graph theoretic foundations of Pathfinder networks. Comput Math Appl. 1988;15:337–45.CrossRef Schvaneveldt RW, Dearholt DW, Durso FT. Graph theoretic foundations of Pathfinder networks. Comput Math Appl. 1988;15:337–45.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Guerrero-Bote VP, Zapico-Alonso F, Espinosa-Calvo ME, Gomez-Crisostomo R, Moya-Anegón F. Binary Pathfinder: an improvement to the Pathfinder algorithm. Inform Process Manag. 2006;42:1484–90.CrossRef Guerrero-Bote VP, Zapico-Alonso F, Espinosa-Calvo ME, Gomez-Crisostomo R, Moya-Anegón F. Binary Pathfinder: an improvement to the Pathfinder algorithm. Inform Process Manag. 2006;42:1484–90.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Leydesdorf L. The generation of aggregated journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 1994;31:59–84.CrossRef Leydesdorf L. The generation of aggregated journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 1994;31:59–84.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Small H, Sweeney E. Clustering the Science Citation Index® using co-citations. I. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics. 1985;7:391–409. Small H, Sweeney E. Clustering the Science Citation Index® using co-citations. I. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics. 1985;7:391–409.
32.
go back to reference Moya-Anegón F, Vargas-Quesada B, Herrero-Solana V, Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Corera-Álvarez E, Munoz-Fernández FJ. A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics. 2004;61:129–45.CrossRef Moya-Anegón F, Vargas-Quesada B, Herrero-Solana V, Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Corera-Álvarez E, Munoz-Fernández FJ. A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics. 2004;61:129–45.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Leydesdorf L. Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Res Policy. 1989;18:209–23.CrossRef Leydesdorf L. Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Res Policy. 1989;18:209–23.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Callon M, Courtial JP, Turner WA, Bauin S. From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to coword analysis. Social Science Information. 1983;22:191–235.CrossRef Callon M, Courtial JP, Turner WA, Bauin S. From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to coword analysis. Social Science Information. 1983;22:191–235.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Clatworthy J, Buick D, Hankins M, Weinman J, Horne R. The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:329–58.CrossRefPubMed Clatworthy J, Buick D, Hankins M, Weinman J, Horne R. The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:329–58.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Yim O, Ramdeen KT. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: Comparison of Three Linkage Measures and Application to Psychological Data. Quant Methods Psychol. 2015;11:8–21.CrossRef Yim O, Ramdeen KT. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: Comparison of Three Linkage Measures and Application to Psychological Data. Quant Methods Psychol. 2015;11:8–21.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Minguet F, Van Den Boogerd L, Salgado TM, Correr CJ, Fernandez-Llimos F. Characterization of the Medical Subject Headings thesaurus for pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71:1965–72.CrossRefPubMed Minguet F, Van Den Boogerd L, Salgado TM, Correr CJ, Fernandez-Llimos F. Characterization of the Medical Subject Headings thesaurus for pharmacy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71:1965–72.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Gorraiz J, Schloegl C. A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science. J Inf Sci. 2008;34:715–25.CrossRef Gorraiz J, Schloegl C. A bibliometric analysis of pharmacology and pharmacy journals: Scopus versus Web of Science. J Inf Sci. 2008;34:715–25.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Rodriguez RW. Comparison of indexing times among articles from medical, nursing, and pharmacy journals. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016;73:569–75.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez RW. Comparison of indexing times among articles from medical, nursing, and pharmacy journals. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016;73:569–75.CrossRefPubMed
45.
46.
go back to reference Anonymous. The International Catalogue of Scientific Literature. Science. 1895;2:154-7. Anonymous. The International Catalogue of Scientific Literature. Science. 1895;2:154-7.
47.
go back to reference Seglen PO. Evaluation of scientific quality using citation analysis and other bibliometric methods. Nord Med. 1989;104(331–5):41. Seglen PO. Evaluation of scientific quality using citation analysis and other bibliometric methods. Nord Med. 1989;104(331–5):41.
48.
go back to reference Drettner B, Seglen PO, Sivertsen G. Inverkanstal som fördelningsinstrument: ej accepterat av tidskrifter i Norden. Läkartidningen. 1994;91:744–5.PubMed Drettner B, Seglen PO, Sivertsen G. Inverkanstal som fördelningsinstrument: ej accepterat av tidskrifter i Norden. Läkartidningen. 1994;91:744–5.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Gøtzsche PC, Krog JW, Moustgaard R. Bibliometrisk analyse af dansk sundhedsvidenskabelig forskning 19881992. Ugeskr Laeger. 1995;157:5075–81.PubMed Gøtzsche PC, Krog JW, Moustgaard R. Bibliometrisk analyse af dansk sundhedsvidenskabelig forskning 19881992. Ugeskr Laeger. 1995;157:5075–81.PubMed
51.
go back to reference Vinkler P. Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics. 1986;10:157–77.CrossRef Vinkler P. Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications. Scientometrics. 1986;10:157–77.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Redefining the pharmacology and pharmacy subject category in the journal citation reports using medical subject headings (MeSH)
Authors
Fernando Minguet
Teresa M. Salgado
Claudio Santopadre
Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-017-0527-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 5/2017 Go to the issue